The Tariq Nasheed Thread

[Jim Cornette]

I actually listen to his podcast faithfully and have watched all of the Hidden Colors. Haven't got a chance to check out 1804 yet. However, I do notice he loves to shoehorn in something about someone being "gay" or "moist" and it just seems pointless. Then he tries to clean it up w/ "moist doesn't mean gay" which is clearly bullshyt because he makes up these random stories about getting "hit on" by a moist Uber driver or a nikka on a plane with a belly button piercing in high heels (which sounds hard to believe). But then again these issues are not my main focus as I'm trying to eradicate white supremacy first and foremost. These discussions about the infighting among our community about which nikka is gay etc. can be had after white supremacy is brought to its knees.

real one

 

[Kerkum]

What if you're not "afraid" and it's just that you don't agree with it or think that it's a lifestyle worthy of respect or above being clowned? It's fine that you don't feel that there's anything wrong with being gay after your brother has chosen to be gay but that doesn't make you morally superior to people who don't share your take. I'd even argue that your take isn't even based on principle, it's based on selfish shyt. Having a gay little brother wouldn't really change your perspective if it was based on principle. It wouldn't matter who. Came out on my family, it wouldn't change my position of homosexuality because it's based on principle.

My issue with dude and the "moist" shyt is that he's much too graphic with his clowning. Some of the references literally put disgusting images in your mind and a lot of times I think it's gratuitous. Waaay over the top. That's him tho, I'm not on that fake self righteous shyt where I'm pretending to be morally superior.

"Chosen to be gay..."
It still baffles me to this day that people say this. Can you provide any research or proof to back up your claims that being gay is a choice? Did you choose to be straight? When a woman makes you sexually aroused is that a choice? Can you mentally tell yourself to become sexually attracted to a woman as if it's a light switch? No, and it doesn't work that way for me either in regards to being attracted to dudes. I cannot choose what I'm attracted to. This shyt is so basic and common sense that most people refuse to look at logic...because they're clouded by their own hate, lack of understanding, or phobia. Just pure ignorance

 

[Momentum]

That nikka Rock Newman is a straight up CAC.

I saw this video in the recommend section after watching his Haiti interview with Tariq.

It's a show about revealing ancestry DNA and this nikka found out that he is 80% CAC.

Yeah I hate how Tariq refers to Newman as a brotha all the time.

 

[big bun]

@ezrathegreat Stop it, man

 

[Jim Cornette]

just listened to the andrew schulz vs tariq talk they had on Brilliant Idiots

fukk Andrew had nothing... he was wrong on everything; police brutality, oprah, religion, gotdamn what a fukking clown. he effectively dismissed white supremacy is/was even a thing.

how does charlamagne work with this dude or even consider him a friend. holy shyt.

 

[Kyle Barker]

That nikka Rock Newman is a straight up CAC.

I saw this video in the recommend section after watching his Haiti interview with Tariq.

It's a show about revealing ancestry DNA and this nikka found out that he is 80% CAC.

Yeah I hate how Tariq refers to Newman as a brotha all the time.

Rock Newman @ 10:29

 

[Gravity]

"Chosen to be gay..."
It still baffles me to this day that people say this. Can you provide any research or proof to back up your claims that being gay is a choice? Did you choose to be straight? When a woman makes you sexually aroused is that a choice? Can you mentally tell yourself to become sexually attracted to a woman as if it's a light switch? No, and it doesn't work that way for me either in regards to being attracted to dudes. I cannot choose what I'm attracted to. This shyt is so basic and common sense that most people refuse to look at logic...because they're clouded by their own hate, lack of understanding, or phobia. Just pure ignorance

There are plenty of people who will tell you that their sexuality is a choice. Plenty of women and men who choose to sleep with both sexes because that's jus what they want to do.


Sexuality is not just about attraction. "Attraction" is a fickle feeling that can come and go. I wasn't initially attracted to bigger chics until I actually slept with one. After that, my attraction to them changed or developed. Sometimes you don't know that you like something until you try it. That's just a fact of life. When I was little, I didn't want to try broccoli because if how it looked. After I tried it tho, I liked it.

So your "attraction" argument doesn't hold weight. It's like I said earlier. What about the guys out here doing gay shyt while denying that they're attracted to men? Is the male prostitute not gay because he says it's only for pay and he's not attracted to other men? Is the down low guy in jail not gay because he claims not to be attracted to men? Of course they're gay regardless of what they claim to be attracted to. Actions are conscious decisions.

You choose to be gay you just don't understand why. You either were abused or just born defective. Being only attracted to the same sex isn't normal. If it were we couldn't survive as a species.

 

[Majestic]

 

[marcuz]

im at some conference that tariq and boyce are speaking at. alotta beautiful black women roaming the halls

 

[Jim Cornette]

'you were either abused or just born defective'


this gravity dude man

sounding like a white Catholic priest

 

[Gravity]

'you were either abused or just born defective'


this gravity dude man

sounding like a white Catholic priest

So sassy
and anti-intellectual
If gay was normal then how would humans have ever made it this far surviving as a species?

I never once claimed that the genuine motives behind the parties applying the logic of separate but equal were in fact doing so in good faith, actually, I say the opposite in every single post I made regarding the subject. You're just flat out lying about my views here, which i'm not sure why since my earlier post haven't gone anywhere and I can quote them at any moment. I guess this some sort of smear tactic, but it's just totally unnecessary.

I haven't lied about anything that you've said. You're right, your posts are still there for all to read so I don't know why you're lying about what you've said.

But I only bring all this up to highlight that it wasn't out right apparent how exactly is the concept of Jim Crow violating the 14th amendment like it was with the black codes which is why it was so elusive to pin down initially using the 14th amendment. It was only once it became abundantly clear that while the races were separate, they were in fact not equal, thus, a violation of the 14th amendment was occurring which is was what eventually lead to the demise of Jim Crow.

^^^This is complete misinformation. It's basically racist propaganda.

It most certainly was apparent from the start that the Jim Crow laws were an extension or new form of the black codes laws and thatthey were created to ensure white supremacy. I'll repeat in simpler terms, it was clear from the start that the Jim Crow laws violated the 14th amendment. You're flat out lying when you say that the 14th amendment led to the demise of Jim Crow. The 14th amendment was adopted in 1868 or 69 and reconstruction ended in 1877. Jim Crow started right around the same time reconstruction ended in 1877 and lasted all the way to the civil rights act of 1964. That's at least 87 years of Jim Crow after the 14th amendment passed. It the 14th amendment was enough to kill Jim Crow then it wouldn't have lasted for 80+ years and they wouldn't have had to pass the civil rights act in 1964. The civil rights act of 1964 SUPPOSEDLY killed Jim Crow but as we see in 2017, blacks are still subjected to systematic discrimination based on race. There's never been a time in this cou try's history where the 14th amendment has been honored and protected in reference to blacks.

Well, first I never made that argument.

You did make that argument.

Yes, in practice within the real world it was, no one is disputing that. In fact, I literally made that point in my last post. However, the real world implementation is separate from the imagined idea of the implementation which is the factor that explains the ruling behind Plessy V. Ferguson and later why Jim crow eventually died. You're not actually engaging what i'm engaging.

The "imagined idea of implementation" regarding Jim Crow segregation was always white supremacy, separate and unequal. Separate but equal was just the PR spin that racists used. The plessy vs Ferguson was wrong and the only explanation for it is white racism.

For example, the claim that segregation doesn't necessarily guarantee discrimination for blacks is different from me personally saying that Jim crow, as practiced in the south, didn't result in the discrimination of blacks. This whole time you have been dealing with the ladder by attempting to strawman me as making that case. But in reality, no such thing actually happened. I've been painstakingly trying to make that clear to you, but you just can't separate the two things in your head.

You're a coward who lies when called out on your bullshyt. This whole time you've been basically arguing that the Jim Crow laws weren't inherently racist and it was only the implementation of the laws that were racist. Then when I call that bullshyt out you lie and pretend I'm just making shyt up on you.

But I only bring all this up to highlight that it wasn't out right apparent how exactly is the concept of Jim Crow violating the 14th amendment like it was with the black codes which is why it was so elusive to pin down initially using the 14th amendment. It was only once it became abundantly clear that while the races were separate, they were in fact not equal, thus, a violation of the 14th amendment was occurring which is was what eventually lead to the demise of Jim Crow.

I re-quoted this for emphasis because it proves that you've been making the argument that it wasn't initially clear that Jim Crow segregation violated the 14th amendment when it was initially clear. You even stoop as low as to lie about the Jim Crow laws denying that they were an extension of the black codes just so you can dodge the well known motive behind their creation. The Jim Crow laws were created to ensure white supremacy and this was known by all. Nobody took that "separate but equal" bullshyt seriously because everyone knew what it was. Whites have been allowed to legally work around the 13-15th amendments because this is a country founded on the principles of white supremacy and the people in power are white supremacists. It's that simple.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@ 1:06:00











@Y2Dre @Shook @Raymond Burrr @Red Shield @bdizzle @satam55 @Houston911 @Michael's Black Son @Sagat @Trajan @Sukairain @YouMadd? @Diasporan Royalty @MalikX @The Black Panther @Demetrius
@Matt504 @SupremexKing @#1 pick @Clutch Robinson @Cat piss martini @AndroidHero

 

[BLΔCK⁂W⊙LF]

These people never have anything of substance to say, just non-witty, unfunny opinionated garbage.

 

[ORDER_66]

 

[Malik1time]

Just read some comments cacs I swear
I'm glad my ancestors rebel and killed those cacs