The State of Black Hollywood: Spike Lee Resorts To Kickstarter To Find Funding For His Movie.

Ayo

SOHH 2001
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,040
Reputation
689
Daps
19,026
Reppin
Back in MIA
A few months back I posted about Spike Lee being unable to find funding for any of his movies because Hollywood didn't care about any black movie that wasn't Tyler Perry.

The Newest Hottest Spike Lee Joint by Spike Lee — Kickstarter
:russ:
I bet Tyler Perry would find funding for his brand of c00nery in 10 seconds flat. And people are saying that his movies don't affect other black directors?:bryan:

Fruitvale station might save black movie making after all. If the Weinstens don't fukk over that young writer/director.
 

Ayo

SOHH 2001
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,040
Reputation
689
Daps
19,026
Reppin
Back in MIA
As I stated in the Video, I promise on my Mother's Grave and Right Hand to the Almighty - every Red Cent, every Wooden Nickel, every Dollar will go up on the Screen and not into my pocket. I'm not taking a Fee, your generous contributions will get this Film made.

I can smell the desperation seeping off this nikka.

At least he still has his pride. I bet Tyler or Oprah would have thrown this nikka a bone.
 

Brofato

Fade Doe
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
5,058
Reputation
390
Daps
9,042
It's moreso the state of the industry. They just want their creative control. Finding private investors who want nothing to do with the film or to meddle seems like it'd be hard if someone is pouring their money into it.

Tyler wouldn't have trouble getting funded because his movies are bankable and I'm sure he wouldn't mind execs messing around with his movie. Spike's are not and Spike would not enjoy that.

Just in the same way that Zach Braff would have trouble funding a movie where he would have complete control vs. Michael Bay who would have no trouble banking a movie.
 

Ayo

SOHH 2001
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,040
Reputation
689
Daps
19,026
Reppin
Back in MIA
Just in the same way that Zach Braff would have trouble funding a movie where he would have complete control vs. Michael Bay who would have no trouble banking a movie.

Zach Braff is not going to find funding for any movie off of the strength of a sitcom. He is not a movie star. He is not an established director or producer. That's why he went to Kickstarter.

Spike Lee is a proven director who used to have films greenlit all day. But now he's in the same boat as Zach Braff. Can't find funding.

Crazy.
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,277
Reputation
2,250
Daps
53,043
Reppin
Continental U.S.
I can smell the desperation seeping off this nikka.

At least he still has his pride. I bet Tyler or Oprah would have thrown this nikka a bone.

Breh Tyler Perry funds his own fukking movies. How many times do nikkas need to be told that. If you want your shyt out there fund your own shyt and or find a way.
 

Ayo

SOHH 2001
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,040
Reputation
689
Daps
19,026
Reppin
Back in MIA
Breh Tyler Perry funds his own fukking movies. How many times do nikkas need to be told that. If you want your shyt out there fund your own shyt and or find a way.

But Tyler Perry DOES NOT DISTRIBUTE HIS OWN MOVIES. How many times do nikkas have to be told that THAT'S where the problem is for black Hollywood. Tyler Perry is guaranteed distribution because every studio loves his c00nery. So he can gamble his own money. Spike Lee is NO LONGER GUARANTEED distribution. Redhook Summer (a film Spike funded himself) was in how many movie theaters?

Making the movie (given that it's not big budget action film) is the easy part. Distribution is the tough part. Without a big distribution push you will never see your money back.
Get it now?
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,615
Daps
70,586
Reppin
Rotterdam
I watched the video, read everything on the page twice and then rewatched the video to see if I missed something, but no...

At no point is it mentioned what the fukk the movie will be about outside of "Human beings who are addicted to blood. Funny, sexy, and bloody (and it's not "Blacula")...", a description so vague it doesn't tell us shyt.

Like, there's really nothing there. Both the video as the whole wall of text boils down to "I'm Spike Lee and I want you to give me money because I'm Spike Lee". Normally I'd be the first to support a new Spike Lee joint but this shyt represents everything wrong with Kickstarter because the only reason Spike Lee gives why I should care about this project is because he's Spike Lee.

The fact he mentions the Veronica Mars and Zach Braff Kickstarters only confirm that. He really thinks being a big name will get him financing automatically and shyt just doesn't work that way.
 

chemicalsword

winter is coming
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
7,746
Reputation
910
Daps
15,666
Reppin
Starkset...
I'm not trying to be all in Spike's pockets like that but how come he is not able to fund his own movies at this stage in his career? Why is he relying solely on hollywood investors?? his movies don't generally have crazy special effects and computer animation. If its true that Tyler Perry funds his own movies... why can't Spike? Is he just not willing to risk the potential loss?? if that is the case I'm not investing in something Spike has no confidence in although I enjoy a majority of the movies he makes. its a shame......
 

HoLLaBaCK

SOHH ICEY
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
3,165
Reputation
660
Daps
5,251
Reppin
New York
I refuse to believe that a dude who has front frow seats at the Knicks games (both home and what seems to be away games too) and almost dresses exclusively in orange and blue :scusthov: needs funds for anything.

Can't talk shyt about the White man then ask them for money Spike :ufdup:
 

Mic-Nificent

I didn't eat nobody
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
10,380
Reputation
650
Daps
18,986
Reppin
NULL
But Tyler Perry DOES NOT DISTRIBUTE HIS OWN MOVIES. How many times do nikkas have to be told that THAT'S where the problem is for black Hollywood. Tyler Perry is guaranteed distribution because every studio loves his c00nery. So he can gamble his own money. Spike Lee is NO LONGER GUARANTEED distribution. Redhook Summer (a film Spike funded himself) was in how many movie theaters?

Making the movie (given that it's not big budget action film) is the easy part. Distribution is the tough part. Without a big distribution push you will never see your money back.
Get it now?

No Tyler Perry is guaranteed distribution because his films always make a huge profit at the box office in addition to huge home sales. Perry has a small but fiercely loyal fanbase and he makes all of his films on a shoestring budget.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
bottom line this shyt is a business
part of being talented is able to create something commercially viable without comprising your integrity
but to be real, last spike lee joint that was beyond average was 25th hour
he needs another Malcolm X level joint, but I don't know if Spike writes as well or just directs
 

CapitalOne

Do You Believe...
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
15,013
Reputation
2,491
Daps
32,530
Reppin
Brooklyn
bottom line this shyt is a business
part of being talented is able to create something commercially viable without comprising your integrity
but to be real, last spike lee joint that was beyond average was 25th hour
he needs another Malcolm X level joint, but I don't know if Spike writes as well or just directs
he writes as well, a majority of his films were written by him
 
Top