It don't matter who's the president of russia. Every russian leader since like 17th century, or whenever that nation was formed, was interested in invading territories. The west keeps making the same mistake hoping they could talk nice to the russia and things would be great.
The Russia - Ukraine Conflict
- Thread starter newarkhiphop
- Start date
Are you fukking dumb? Do you think country borders are 1 inch wide or something? Accidental misfire into another country
Unless Russia ACTUALLY invades a NATO country you're just talking to talk. Lmao @ them invading Finland.
The only sensible and educated poster on the thread from what I’ve read thus far.
The muppet “AyBrehAM Linkin” is just as daft as his corny name. He’s a cornball with no brain living in his mum’s basement.
The idiot doesn’t even know how far Poland is from the regions Russia is attacking. Skip geography classes in school, brehs.
Also, a lot of them just wake up, listen to the idiots in the media selling propaganda to dumb people down and brazenly start spouting nonsense on the internet. I bet he doesn’t know where Finland is on the map and what the terrain is like. Unless there’s a major global war - Russia can’t invade Baltic countries with the intentions of taking them except Putin is suicidal and he wants a lot of Russian servicemen in body bags. The terrain in the Baltic is as impossible to control by an invading force - as the mountainous areas in Afghanistan. They’ll get destroyed in asymmetric warfare - coupled with the fact that any country can land amphibious forces there pretty easily. Russia has Kaliningrad there and that’s all it needs geopolitically.
I broke down how Russia will most likely invade Ukraine on a next thread last week. Apart from Donbas (including Mariupol) - they’ll take all of Ukraine’s coast including Odessa due to the Russian breakaway region in Moldova (to protect them from Ukrainians in the west). And most likely Kiev for regime change.
I’m just interested in seeing how Russian forces would pass through Chernobyl in order to take Kiev. That would be one of the most daring and sophisticated military manoeuvres in the 21st century.
Jean Jacket
NOPE
High quality poster
Veteran
If you are in control of a country, you can have somebody merked. The government can spit up 5 mill for a hit on somebody like Trump. I'm a different breed, I don't lie, so it wouldn't be a secret with somebody like me in office.
Unfortunately, I never met anyone who met my level of honesty, loyalty, and humanity. Especially when you add the willingness for violence. Anything I'd do that is violent would be to help others, period. It's no need to lie to the country about something like that
You are fukking delusional that’s it. Seek help.
FukkaPaidEmail
Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Natural Gas stocks
so can some explain this?
basically the world woo stop trading goods woth russia?
ALonelyDad
Veteran
Tulsi has always been stupid, she tricked people into thinking she was some anti-war candidate while also supporting one of the biggest nationalists in India lmao
Sometimes i wish i had. Abunker in idaho or some shyt
DetroitEWarren
Superstar
Putin is in Russia doing this exact shyt, but if an opposition recognized the danger of this right wing takeover AROUND THE WORLD decided to respond in a similar, y'all would say it was wrong
.nikka do you know how many people are actually oppressed in this world. Not this right wing garbage they say ok Fox news, I'm talking real lives being pushed down so rich lives can prosper.
How else do you beat that, fukk nikka? Give me an example of a better strategy?
You think I'd let Mitch McConnell block a bill I'm trying to pass or do you think it would be a great idea to just off him, be honest about it, and make sure the next elected pink bytch plays his role correctly? 80% of this world would agree that a single person, that's a threat to equality, democracy, climate change, and lots of other important shyt, deserves to be put down.
One thing this world hasn't seen I'd an actual honest politician. Putin kills, and goes and lies about it, because he is killing to forward a right wing dominance. This right wing dominance only includes about 20% of this whole world, as far as people who share those beliefs. Problem is, THEY HAVE ALL THE MONEY.
You actually think it's a bad idea to just kill these people and size their funds? If a politician had the swagger to deliver a message to the people properly, you can explain the definite reason for each hit.
Y'all nikkas are soft. My hood would break you nikkas
Don't know what he's saying but the translation says they're under martial law:
Skrt Angle
Pro
NATO has more enemies than Russia does. They were at ‘peace’ with Russia on some assured destruction, let’s dominate and brutalise peacefully tip.
So after Africa, Asia and M.E, NATO decides Ukraine can’t be a proxy because Europe is too close to home. NATO is white supremacy and now that someone else has nukes and can play the game better.
So after Africa, Asia and M.E, NATO decides Ukraine can’t be a proxy because Europe is too close to home. NATO is white supremacy and now that someone else has nukes and can play the game better.
Sanctions don’t work and most of it is just symbolism.
No leader would risk unrest by its citizens caused by economic hardship - to protect a country thousands of miles away.
Even within the EU - countries like Germany, Italy, Hungary and a host of others were against any sanctions that would have effects on their own economy as at yesterday and they weren’t speaking with one voice.
The UK has also been reluctant with sanctions despite all the posturing in the media because the economy is already on shaky legs.
As for the Russians, I’m sure they weighed their options and they don’t care. First 2wks would be tough on them but it will be back to business as usual - with China replacing whatever they miss.
The world is too interconnected for people to stop trading. And a lot of countries in Europe depend largely on Russian energy supply. Winter isn’t over - so they won’t be cutting that off any time soon.