That's fine it can be in the minority, but let me state facts for you. P4P is based on Accomplishments, resume, and eye test, correct? Tank is a multiple division champ, that is facts. Tank easily passes the eye test, that is facts. Tank may be lazy and undisciplined but it don't change the fact he is an incredibly talented boxer. You gotta stop letting the fact you don't like a fighter blind you from the fact that by the criteria of how you are supposed to rank P4P fighters Tank has an argument to be there, I feel Crawford is overrated as fukk and I still have him in my P4P list. Like I said I didn't vote for Tank and feel if he should of been on the list he should of been dead last at #10.
His resume is thin, but honestly so is Crawford's recent resume(Gamboa and Postol at the time were good wins but not P4P level wins), Inoue resume is also kinda thin especially since he completely skipped 115 and didn't run any of them tough ass fades he would of had to run and his 3 career best wins all came against guys who were 10+ years older than him, Teofimo Lopez beat Loma and Commey, good wins but still one weight class. Spence is the first 147 fighter to beat Brook, beat Porter and Danny, still only one weight class. Jermell is a 3 belt unified champ, but again one weight class. Do you see where I'm going here? If I spend enough time I can break down any fighters resume and make it look weak or detract from it. I keep the same criteria for everybody.
