Ur being disingenuous. The origins of this nonsense wasn't somebody attempting to use him. People try to use others everyday. The true origins of this evil were his inability to control himself, his poor choices in a woman, and his dumb decision to nut raw or even nut period with a chick he didn't want to start a family with.
He bears sole responsibility for his fukked up life and the consequences b/c he could have prevented it all by saying no to rachet p*ssy. But some dudes think they are invincible and natural cause and effect doesn't apply to them.
After he fukked up and things spiraled out of his control he became a coward and a murderer. He deserved every dyck he had to take up the azz in prison and life ain't done with him yet.
Compartmentalism is important.
If calling him a coward or a murderer makes or any other name makes you feel better, continue in that direction. But believing those names you call him somehow absolves him of clear motive is simply incorrect.
You are so hung up on what choices he could/should of made in your hypotheticals, that you still have not acknowledged reality.
In reality, he didn't make those choices. He made decesions that led him to a juncture where he impregnated a woman, presumably (might not of been his). At that point the choice string for him pauses. The next series of choices were not his to make. She began making decesions disadvantages to him. Refusing to terminate the pregnancy, attempting to indicate he is the father despite his protests to both, etc. The choice for him to pay child support is again out of his hands. Its the governments in collaboration with her compliance to the process. His next choice string resumes after all of these decesions which are not his own. His decesion to hire an assassin to kill her and free himself from her extortion.
Thats how this played out, step by step.
It is a common practice for people undergoing outrage to label murderers evil or crazy so that they do not have to address the motivation or build up to the action itself.
But that is the most important part in preventing future occurances.
If you cannot confront it, thats fine. I understand the phenomenon. But ignoring something does not mean that it isn't there because you won't acknoledge it.
This murder stemmed from what he believed was an attempt to extort money from him by a woman he did not want a chid with. That doesn't justify the murder. But its silly to pretend he murdered her for no reason or for reasons that had nothing to do with her.