The problem with the game awards

gurf

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
3,450
Reputation
433
Daps
6,936
That was not a tweet from Jason Schrier in that thread. It was from a known racist cac.

As for Jason Schrier himself, i don’t think he’s personally said anything problematic.

But again. Twitter is a racist safe haven ran by a nasty racist white man.

If you chose to use that platform, that is the baseline of the crowd you are interacting with.

Which is why most people with any decency and integrity are abandoning the platform.

As a not racist person, why do you need that platform in your life?

Now straight up news with evidence is fine. (even though you don’t NEEED twitter for that)

Parroting someone else’s opinion or rumors just cause they posted it on the racist website is very problematic.
I don't give a damn if it was posted on Mastadon or Bluesky. If someone posts something and they have a history of posting bullshyt, I'm calling it out.

The platform is just the platform and as much as you (and I) hate the way twitter has turned, it's still the platform with the biggest outreach.

You can't sit here and lump everyone together because they use twitter or not. Do some research on the person in question instead.
 

Jaguar93

Superstar
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
12,059
Reputation
2,621
Daps
62,211
source.gif
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,188
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,981
Reppin
Tha Land
I don't give a damn if it was posted on Mastadon or Bluesky. If someone posts something and they have a history of posting bullshyt, I'm calling it out.

The platform is just the platform and as much as you (and I) hate the way twitter has turned, it's still the platform with the biggest outreach.

You can't sit here and lump everyone together because they use twitter or not. Do some research on the person in question instead.
Would you co-sign bringing opinions here from st0rmfr0nt?

The entire reason people post tweets is because the platform somehow gives these random opinions more weight.

If the platform itself is run by a racist, for racists then the “weight” behind your opinions is racist, even if you are not.

Again. Most decent people have realized this and got the hell away from there.

Don’t know why some of you are so hooked on defending the shyt.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,188
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,981
Reppin
Tha Land
What I did was a simple trick. You click on the video, then go to their channel.

If you see titles talking about woke, DEI or any of that Bullshìt, then it's a racist channel.
Accept, nobody actually does this process when a tweet says something they like.

People are only looking into these guys when they want to discredit an opinion.

I’ve now posted at least two popular sony stans that get posted on this site all the time, but they also talk the DEI, woke bullshyt.

I ain’t never seen any of you call @Gizmo_Duck out for posting them.

You guys attack me for calling them “cac tweets” tho.
:smh:
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
17,046
Reputation
3,498
Daps
62,696
Reppin
Hackney, London
Gizmo knows who he is.

I’m sure you’ve been in a thread dapping him when he’s posted that cacs opinion.
Really? I don't think that's the case.

But back to this thread. Titan posted a blatant racist tweets as the basis of the thread. Then posted a right-wing grifter YouTuber.

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt because maybe he didn't do due diligence. But if I see anymore shyt like this posted by him or anybody else, I know they're a cosplaying cac.
 

gurf

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
3,450
Reputation
433
Daps
6,936
Would you co-sign bringing opinions here from st0rmfr0nt?

The entire reason people post tweets is because the platform somehow gives these random opinions more weight.

If the platform itself is run by a racist, for racists then the “weight” behind your opinions is racist, even if you are not.

Again. Most decent people have realized this and got the hell away from there.

Don’t know why some of you are so hooked on defending the shyt.
I'm not defending the platform.

But I'm also not going to lump in Jason Schreier in the same group as whatever racist, anti-dei poster due to the platform either.

You think any legitimate news sources are posting on SF? Any respected journalists?

You can leave the exaggerated comparisons at home, cause what you're attempting to argue is total BS and you know it.

This whole "they are the same" BS is goofy as fukk.
 

rdj

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
907
Reputation
75
Daps
2,071
I've noticed the past 3 years people are pretending that they care about the awards/developer part of the game awards :mjlol: . Geoff should just announce he going to have less awards and more game trailers and see how fraudulent people are. Mostly xbots crying every fukking year about an award show. DLC shouldn't be counted !!!:sadbron::sadbron::sadbron: Nikka if the DLC is more engaging, fun, better quality than your full price standalone eat a fukking dikk. Gamers are such bytches.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,188
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,981
Reppin
Tha Land
I'm not defending the platform.

But I'm also not going to lump in Jason Schreier in the same group as whatever racist, anti-dei poster due to the platform either.

You think any legitimate news sources are posting on SF? Any respected journalists?

You can leave the exaggerated comparisons at home, cause what you're attempting to argue is total BS and you know it.

This whole "they are the same" is goofy as fukk.
“i’m sure there’s decent people just reporting the news on st0rmfr0nt”

Do you now see how problematic that is?

I didn’t bring up Jason Schrier, you did.

Again, there’s a reason people who want to be decent and productive have abandoned the platform.

There’s a reason people like JS have stuck around. They NEED the racist engagement to make a living.

I’d rather not spend any time trying to decipher who’s an actual racist or not, when they are all in the same boat.
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
17,046
Reputation
3,498
Daps
62,696
Reppin
Hackney, London
Accept, nobody actually does this process when a tweet says something they like.

People are only looking into these guys when they want to discredit an opinion.

I’ve now posted at least two popular sony stans that get posted on this site all the time, but they also talk the DEI, woke bullshyt.

I ain’t never seen any of you call @Gizmo_Duck out for posting them.

You guys attack me for calling them “cac tweets” tho.
:smh:
No, I always check the source. First I click on the profile pic. This brings the profile of said tweeter. Back in the day you could pretty much look at a entire timeline without having an account.

These days you only see three or four tweets but usually these giveaway what the poster is about.

If a post has a link, I go to the source and read the article. I read the quotes of the article. This is important as you need to see if a person is being taken out of context.

The reason why I do this is because I was misquoted by a national newspaper. People accused me of being racist because the journalist took a few lines of a lengthy conversation and made it into a sound bite
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,188
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,981
Reppin
Tha Land
No, I always check the source. First I click on the profile pic. This brings the profile of said tweeter. Back in the day you could pretty much look at a entire timeline without having an account.

These days you only see three or four tweets but usually these giveaway what the poster is about.

If a post has a link, I go to the source and read the article. I read the quotes of the article. This is important as you need to see if a person is being taken out of context.

The reason why I do this is because I was misquoted by a national newspaper. People accused me of being racist because the journalist took a few lines of a lengthy conversation and made it into a sound bite
Most people do not do this.

I’ve been accused of hating, stanning, defending, whatever on this site for taking the extra step and following the story.

This is why i call them cac tweets. Most times the caption of the tweet is clickbait, exaggeration, opinion, that’s not really supported by the actual info or evidence within the body of the tweet.
 
Top