The People Vs. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story

[GzUp]

Not sure

Is it this one?

 

[Silkk]

Is it this one?

Not playing
Check the channel guide

 

[Reggie]

This is the question no one has any answer to. I know exactly where Nicole's place in Brentwood is. That's a very open area.

Did OJ kill Nicole first and then Goldman showed up and OJ killed Goldman? Or did OJ pop out of the bushes when Goldman showed up and then killed them both? Because they way her condo is, it would've been near impossible for him to have killed Nicole first, and then Goldman shows up and OJ kills him. Because Goldman had to be buzzed into the Condo. Which means Nicole had to have buzzed Goldman in. Also if Nicole was already dead when Goldman showed up, he would've clearly seen her dead body before he even enter the condo gate.

Does anyone have any insight to how the murders went down? Like do you think OJ ambushed both of them? Or killed Nicole first?

Maybe OJ buzzed him in.?

 

[Tony D'Amato]

When that Furman cross exam airs...

 

[Formerly known as...]

This is the question no one has any answer to. I know exactly where Nicole's place in Brentwood is. That's a very open area.

Did OJ kill Nicole first and then Goldman showed up and OJ killed Goldman? Or did OJ pop out of the bushes when Goldman showed up and then killed them both? Because they way her condo is, it would've been near impossible for him to have killed Nicole first, and then Goldman shows up and OJ kills him. Because Goldman had to be buzzed into the Condo. Which means Nicole had to have buzzed Goldman in. Also if Nicole was already dead when Goldman showed up, he would've clearly seen her dead body before he even enter the condo gate.

Does anyone have any insight to how the murders went down? Like do you think OJ ambushed both of them? Or killed Nicole first?

Hmm, good question.

I always assumed Goldman was already in the house? So Nicole answered the door, OJ killed her then Goldman came downstairs or to where Nicole was and saw OJ and then OJ proceeded to kill him as well.

 

[BobbyBooshay]

You really believe that? There's part of me that believes he didn't do it alone. But I believe he did it.

He was involved IMO

 

[BobbyBooshay]

Slightly off topic, but related to OJ, watched this recently and few points:



1, do Judges really speak for this long when issuing a sentence or she just wanna be famous

2, the judge mentions that the sentencing has nothing to do with the murder trial, why bring it up then multiple times ?

 

[GzUp]

 

[Ciggavelli]

I just watched Investigative Discovery's 2 hour doc on the trial. What sealed it for me was when Mark Furmahn used his 5th amendment right when asked if he ever planted evidence. If that doesn't convince you of OJ's innocence, then I dunno what to say. That shyt was unbelievable

Plus the gloves and tampered with DNA. You can't tell me you can find OJ guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Too much shyt was fishy.

 

[TooLazyToMakeUp1]

Slightly off topic, but related to OJ, watched this recently and few points:



1, do Judges really speak for this long when issuing a sentence or she just wanna be famous

2, the judge mentions that the sentencing has nothing to do with the murder trial, why bring it up then multiple times ?

She was grandstanding like a muthafukka. I would've thrown a chair at the bytch

 

[Eastside Get The Money]

Watch this entire interview....the interviewer is a comedian from the UK. Part 2 (2:30) is interesting in that she interviews OJ's agent...Mike Gilbert. Mr. Gilbert is not that known but he's still a very compelling person in this whole saga. Gilbert was one of the only few people who worked for OJ before the murders and continued to work with him for a number of years after the murderers. He was an agent who set up memorabilia signings for OJ, particularly after the murders, they would set up secret meetings with clients and OJ would sign a bunch of sh1t for them and he and Gilbert would basically get paid under the table (away from the Goldmans).

Anyway, Mr. Gilbert just recently wrote a book called "How I helped OJ get away with Murder" and in the book he describes how it was his idea to convince OJ to STOP taking his arthritis medications. According to Gilbert, OJ's hands would swell up when he forgot to take his medications (happened often prior to the murderers, when he and Gilbert would travel together on business). So Gilbert suggested to OJ to stop taking his medications a few days before the infamous Glover try on.

When you guys get the chance, watch all Parts of the interview..especially the last couple of minutes of the interview. The comedian is clearly trolling the entire interview. After you guys watch, I can post some excerpts from Mr. Gilbert's book....its f*cking compelling. In the book he admits (in exhausting detail) how he and OJ pretty much hid a lot of money and valuables in order to NOT pay the Goldman's. Gilbert makes himself look like such a piece of sh1t in the book that it's hard NOT to believe him. The confession chapter, where Gilbert claims OJ confessed to him has to be one of the most interesting things I've ever read on this case.

Gilbert is real flakey so i don't know if I believe him or not, but the things he says isn't farfetched.

He mentioned that the Bronco chase was staged (why the 30 police cars were going 20mph and AC was never charged)

Arthritis medicine - I think the show will make note of this. If you check the first 2 episodes OJ keeps taking the pills at random times and the camera always zooms in. Coli $$$ on that being the bone meds.

Dude can't be trusted, but honestly everything he says makes perfect sense. Either he's telling the truth or is so broke that he has 10+ years to develop these theories.

 

[BobbyBooshay]

She was grandstanding like a muthafukka. I would've thrown a chair at the bytch

Prob thinking this will turn into a film, so wanted some huge speech

 

[BobbyBooshay]

When that Furman cross exam airs...

Cant wait

Hope they show all the circus nonsense too in the courtroom lol

The REAL case was like a TV show

 

[seemorecizzy]

I just watched Investigative Discovery's 2 hour doc on the trial. What sealed it for me was when Mark Furmahn used his 5th amendment right when asked if he ever planted evidence. If that doesn't convince you of OJ's innocence, then I dunno what to say. That shyt was unbelievable

Plus the gloves and tampered with DNA. You can't tell me you can find OJ guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Too much shyt was fishy.

There's wayyy too much reasonable doubt to convict him. Way too much. The guy who found everything got caught in a very blantant lie and WOULDNT deny that he planted any of the evidence

It had to be not guilty, it's a No brainer

 

[BobbyBooshay]

There's wayyy too much reasonable doubt to convict him. Way too much. The guy who found everything got caught in a very blantant lie and WOULDNT deny that he planted any of the evidence

It had to be not guilty, it's a No brainer

You got link for this please