The Packers are the most "we beat ourselves" whiners I've ever seen in football

[NYC Rebel]

My initial quote was even intended to get thsi type of rise out of everyone.

So you intend to be the clown when everyone is talking about the game.

Who LOOKS for that online? What does it do for you?

smh....

 

[Absolut]

lol @ "no one was stopping that offense until someone stopped it"

 

[NYC Rebel]

lol @ "no one was stopping that offense until someone stopped it"

LOL

 

[Bboystyle]

lol @ "no one was stopping that offense until someone stopped it"

The Chiefs laid the blue print for stopping their offense...After that it was a wrap...Dom Capers time is up as well...He can not adjust for shyt...He sticks to his plan regardless of the "miscommunications" and poor coverage...MM also needs to change how the O plays sometimes...When we play against competitive teams, we usually take until the 4th quarter to show up if our O is slacking...


Bottom line is the rest of the season hinges on the coaching staff

 

[Trip]

lol @ "no one was stopping that offense until someone stopped it"

its impossible to take your opinion seriously with your involvement with gambling...your bias against the teams that cost you money is beyond obvious

 

[Trip]

So you intend to be the clown when everyone is talking about the game.

Who LOOKS for that online? What does it do for you?

smh....

good lord you are being super annoying.

just keep it moving thx

 

[Absolut]

lol @ an oddsmaker having a bias. its my job to not overreact and to stay as objective as possible

 

[Trip]

lol @ an oddsmaker having a bias. its my job to not overreact and to stay as objective as possible

gimme a break.

was vegas + or - on GB SF yesterday?

 

[Absolut]

we needed the packers pretty bad yesterday. when the niners are good, they get bet WAY more than any other team out here in nevada

 

[Trip]

we needed the packers pretty bad yesterday. when the niners are good, they get bet WAY more than any other team out here in nevada

No shyt?

lol

 

[Absolut]

so wheres my bias lie in the fact that im defending the team that beat us out of money yesterday, and saying it should have been a bigger blowout than it was?

 

[Trip]

I think its fairly clear you are annoyed with how the Packers played yesterday and it wasn't the vintage Rodger's we've been used to seeing.

Its week 1. Lets not overreact.

 

[Absolut]

how am i annoyed, when i mocked you for your insinuation this games outcome was only because the "packers looked choppy"? lol @ looking at something objectively equaling being annoyed

 

[Trip]

how am i annoyed, when i mocked you for your insinuation this games outcome was only because the "packers looked choppy"? lol @ looking at something objectively equaling being annoyed

youre annoyed cause the book lost money obviously.

I never insinuated the games outcome was only because the Packers offense looked choppy. It was a fukking observation....and it was surprising to see considering how dominant their offense was last year. Rodgers was beast mode unstoppable virtually up until he took 3 weeks off last year and its strangely carried over.

I dont know how that automatically means Im not giving the Niners credit. They are an awesome team.

 

[feelosofer]

like i said, it was one score

SF didn't score until Rodgers gifts wraps an INT

that sealed the game with Gore running

SF was more than built to overcome it.. GB wasn't winning yesterday even if we got more help

+rep for your honesty, some of the truest words spoken on this thread.

SAN FRANCISCO IS BUILT TO STOP HIGH SCORING OFFENSES.

THEY HAVE AN ELITE PASS RUSH, SOLID DB'S, A BALL CONTROL QB AND PASSING OFFENSE AND 2 VERY GOOD RUNNING BACKS + AN ATHLETIC FULLBACK.

OLD SCHOOL POWER FOOTBALL