Clayton Endicott
Superstar
shyt is 60 years in the making, and it's been plainly obvious for that long. Now if you want to take it back further, cacs been salty since 1865.
The owner of AdultFriendFinder found to be funding an international race science group that want to create a new SS of elite whites.
- Thread starter Dr. Acula
- Start date
It's always the flabbiest, pastiest, anemic looking white dudes that are obsessed with master races and IQ.
Kornball The Conqueror
Superstar
of course he created the biggest cuck website
GoPinheiro
Pro
Im perfectly okay with "scientific racism" as long as its based in fact. We welcome the debate
I am also completely okay with it. However, there is a major issue, and that is, black people don't get the same financial backing that cacs get when it comes to race science. And this backing matters a lot in modern times. Just a few weeks ago, a dude in Chicago published an essay saying that black people are more violent, his university(University Of Chicago) accepted his essay, and later the university was gifted 100 million dollars from an anonymous donor.
$100 million gift will advance UChicago’s commitment to free expression
Gift will build upon the University’s longstanding leadership in free expression while expanding the Chicago Forum’s impactful work
Like, when discussing race science, cacs selectively pick traits out of insecurity. Traits that they believe are going to be more advantageous to them. And with financial backing they publish "scientific studies" in their favor. If later on, they see that the traits they attributed to others(let's say, black people) are actually valuable or less valuable but more common with them, then they will re-brand their theories, adapt it, and with financial backing publish new "scientific studies" in their favor.
We see this with neanderthals or testosterone. Cacs used to say that black people are the ones with more neanderthal DNA. Now cacs say that Neanderthals had bigger brains, were smarter than modern humans (even though they were replaced and extinct, and made some of the worst tools when compared to hominids from their era).
Cacs used to say that high testosterone is bad for you and makes you extremely violent and it is the reason for the violent gene in Amerindians, African descendants or even in Maoris from New Zealand. However, now that they have noticed how they suffer from low testosterone and how it has made them extremely feminine(most feminine racial group on earth), they have been trying to re-brand themselves about it. You now hear things like blacks are more feminine and have more oestrogen.
I've seen this in many discussions. A cac will say "Blacks have the violent gene". A black dude will reply "Well, good, I will take the violent gene. Whites have the cuck gene."
And the same cac in the discussion will be like "Oh well, there is no cuck gene. You are just making everything up. Blacks are the ones more feminine."
Or even hairiness. Body hair and baldness. For instance, a commonality within all primates is their body hairiness. Monkeys, gorillas, macaques, proboscis etc are hairy. And Cacs are among the hairiest demographics. On average, way more hairy than blacks.
So, what happens when a lot of people start to notice this? You are inundated with a bunch of "studies" promoting hairiness and intelligence. You start hearing that hairiness is to adapt to cold weather but you hear zero explanations on how Siberians, for instance the Eskimos, are hairless despite having adapted themselves in extreme cold weathers. Basically, hairiness goes from a trait related to lack of evolution to something valuable that needs to be appreciated due to its relationship with intelligence.
"And a study of 117 Mensa members (who have an IQ of at least 140) were also found to have a tendency to thick body hair."
The hirsute of higher intelligence
www.independent.co.uk
A Penn State University study, arguing that hairy men are more intelligent:
Same for balding. Cacs are more likely to bald than blacks. And primates tend to bald, even more in captivity(or, living like us humans now).
So, what do you see next? Well, the usual...
"Study shows bald men are smarter, more successful and masculine"
"In other words, baldness might be the human equivalent of a male peacock’s ornate, brightly coloured tail. It might have evolved because it is attractive to women."
The benefits of going bald
Want to appear more intelligent, influential, educated and honest? Lose your hair.
www.bbc.com
Not enough? Okay, then what about cuckolding? By now, it is evident that whites are more into cuckolding than other groups. So what's next? You start seeing "studies" arguing that cuckolding is healthy and for intelligent people.
"Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony."
Cuckolding: The Sex Fetish for Intellectuals
It’s S&M for Ph.D.s: Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony.
"Cuckolding can be GOOD for couples: Watching your partner have sex with another person can strengthen your relationship, claim controversial scientists"
'Cuckolding' couples that act out cheating fantasies can be happier
Cuckolding can lead to couples who enjoy the 'most effective communication skills', according to a research led by Albuquerque-based psychologist Dr David Ley (stock image).
These might sound like minimal things but they are not. It is how they operate. If black people had 7 fingers, they would have published "studies" saying that 7 fingers are linked to lack of intelligence. If later on, a sizable number of whites worldwide were found to have 8 fingers, cacs would flip flop and say that 8 is greater than 7. So people with 8 fingers are more intelligent. It's how they function.
However, you and I won't be able to find a black billionaire willing to donate to us in case we try to do the same in favor of black people. Because Black billionaires or even multi-millionaires, are shielded and believe that it is a class issue, not race issue. Aliko Dangote or Robert Smith won't donate to shyt like this. Many black people end up abandoning these fields because they have zero financial support and some are even shunned by a sizable number of black people.
A cac shunned by the left, will get funding from a centrist or right-winger Cac billionaire or multi-millionaire, and vice-versa. But it's not the same for black people. You are shunned and that's it. Everyone starts acting like you are insane or bitter. How many black people have noticed so many physical and pathologically weird things about cacs but are forced to express their thoughts in a playful and sensitive way? A lot...
Last edited:
VertigoKnight
Veteran
For some reason has a website of paintings he does or gets done. The first painting is him as woman
But as you scroll done see how many asian women paintings he has
Andrew Conru
But as you scroll done see how many asian women paintings he has
Andrew Conru
They've been salty since the French Revolution and the downfall of aristocracy.
DetroitEWarren
Superstar
We can discuss how we need a political leader EXACTLY like Big Meech or Suge Knight
We can talk about how dope it would be if Big Meech studied up on politics while locked up and grabbed the attention of street influenced black men and turned them away from bytch ass traitor nikkas like Tariq.
Those would be some relevant conversations "Zeke"
I am also completely okay with it. However, there is a major issue, and that is, black people don't get the same financial backing that cacs get when it comes to race science. And this backing matters a lot in modern times. Just a few weeks ago, a dude in Chicago published an essay saying that black people are more violent, his university(University Of Chicago) accepted his essay, and later the university was gifted 100 million dollars from an anonymous donor.
$100 million gift will advance UChicago’s commitment to free expression
Gift will build upon the University’s longstanding leadership in free expression while expanding the Chicago Forum’s impactful worknews.uchicago.edu
Like, when discussing race science, Cacs selectively pick traits out of insecurity. Traits that they believe are going to be more advantageous to them. And with financial backing they publish "scientific studies" in their favor. If later on, they see that the traits they attributed to others(let's say, black people) are actually valuable or less valuable but more common with them, then they will re-brand their theories, adapt it, and with financial backing publish new "scientific studies" in their favor.
We see this with neanderthals or testosterone. Cacs used to say that black people are the ones with more neanderthal DNA. Now Cacs say that Neanderthals had bigger brains, were smarter than modern humans (even though they were replaced and extinct, and made some of the worst tools when compared to hominids from their era).
Cacs used to say that high testosterone is bad for you and makes you extremely violent and it is the reason for the violent gene in Amerindians, African descendants or even in Maoris from New Zealand. However, now that they have noticed how they suffer from low testosterone and how it has made them extremely feminine, they have been trying to re-brand themselves about it. You now hear things like blacks are more feminine and have more Oestrogen.
I've seen this in many discussions. A Cac will say "Blacks have the violent gene". A black dude will reply "Well, good, whites have the cuck gene."
And the same cac in the discussion will be like "Ohhh well, there is no cuck gene. You are just making everything up. Blacks are the ones more feminine."
Or even hairiness. Body hair and baldness. For instance, a commonality within all primates is their body hairiness. Monkeys, gorillas, macaques, proboscis etc are hairy. And Cacs are among the hairiest demographics. On average, way more hairy than blacks.
So, what happens when a lot of people start to notice this? You are inundated with a bunch of "studies" promoting hairiness and intelligence. You start hearing that hairiness is to adapt to cold weather but you hear zero explanations on how Siberians, for instance the Eskimos, are hairless despite having adapted themselves in extreme cold weathers. Basically, hairiness goes from a trait related to lack of evolution to something valuable that needs to be appreciated due to its relationship with intelligence.
"And a study of 117 Mensa members (who have an IQ of at least 140) were also found to have a tendency to thick body hair."
The hirsute of higher intelligence
A Penn State University study, arguing that hairy men are more intelligent.
Same for balding. Cacs are more likely to bald than blacks. And primates tend to bald, even more in captivity(or, like us humans).
So, what do you see next? Well, the usual...
"Study shows bald men are smarter, more successful and masculine"
"In other words, baldness might be the human equivalent of a male peacock’s ornate, brightly coloured tail. It might have evolved because it is attractive to women."
The benefits of going bald
Want to appear more intelligent, influential, educated and honest? Lose your hair.
Not enough? Okay, then what about cuckolding? By now, it is evident that whites are more into cuckolding than other groups. So what's next? You start seeing "studies" arguing that cuckolding is healthy and for intelligent people.
"Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony."
Cuckolding: The Sex Fetish for Intellectuals
It’s S&M for Ph.D.s: Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony.www.thedailybeast.com
"Cuckolding can be GOOD for couples: Watching your partner have sex with another person can strengthen your relationship, claim controversial scientists"
'Cuckolding' couples that act out cheating fantasies can be happier
Cuckolding can lead to couples who enjoy the 'most effective communication skills', according to a research led by Albuquerque-based psychologist Dr David Ley (stock image).www.dailymail.co.uk
These might sound minimal things but they are not. It is how they operate. If black people had 7 fingers, they would have published "studies" saying that 7 fingers are linked to lack of intelligence. If later on, a sizable number of whites worldwide were found to have 8 fingers, cacs would flip flop and say that 8 is greater than 7. So people with 8 fingers are more intelligent. It's how they function.
However, you and I won't be able to find a black billionaire willing to donate to us in case we try to do the same in favor of black people. Because Black billionaires or even multi-millionaires, are shielded and believe that it is a class issue, not race issue. Aliko Dangote or Robert Smith won't donate to shyt like this. Many black people end up abandoning these fields because they have zero financial support and some are even shunned by a sizable number of black people.
A cac shunned by the left, will get funding from a centrist or right-winger Cac billionaire or multi-millionaire, and vice-versa. But it's not the same for black people. You are shunned and that's it. Everyone start acting like you are insane or bitter. How many black people have noticed so many weird things about cacs but are forced to express their thoughts in a playful and sensitive way? A lot...
Great post. The people who control the politics control the science#PoliticalScience. And a science thats political cant truly be trusted as reap science. As you said,it becomes more about whos funding what?Do the scientist want that funding to continue or not? Do the people funding you want the Egyptians to be a little on the pale side? So what if peers come out and say differently,who has the most funding to push the narrative they want out?
I believe this what you were getting at. No we dont have the funding to push our narrative. But I only push back with how influential black people have been in this country and globally.
If black people got as heavily into science as we did hiphop,I believe we would be just as influential.
Weve already seen this with how weve shifted the consciences of this country multiple times before. Despite have the machine and system itself working against us.
The problem is at present time we would prefer to push ignorance,jokes,sex rather than knowledge
Science don't work like that which is why this bad racial science can be disputed and exposed with facts.Great post. The people who control the politics control the science#PoliticalScience. And a science thats political cant truly be trusted as reap science. As you said,it becomes more about whos funding what?Do the scientist want that funding to continue or not? Do the people funding you want the Egyptians to be a little on the pale side? So what if peers come out and say differently,who has the most funding to push the narrative they want out?
I believe this what you were getting at. No we dont have the funding to push our narrative. But I only push back with how influential black people have been in this country and globally.
If black people got as heavily into science as we did hiphop,I believe we would be just as influential.
Weve already seen this with how weve shifted the consciences of this country multiple times before. Despite have the machine and system itself working against us.
The problem is at present time we would prefer to push ignorance,jokes,sex rather than knowledge
They control the media and avenues of influence. Nobody "controls" science.
GoPinheiro
Pro
I am also completely okay with it. However, there is a major issue, and that is, black people don't get the same financial backing that cacs get when it comes to race science. And this backing matters a lot in modern times. Just a few weeks ago, a dude in Chicago published an essay saying that black people are more violent, his university(University Of Chicago) accepted his essay, and later the university was gifted 100 million dollars from an anonymous donor.
$100 million gift will advance UChicago’s commitment to free expression
Gift will build upon the University’s longstanding leadership in free expression while expanding the Chicago Forum’s impactful work
Like, when discussing race science, cacs selectively pick traits out of insecurity. Traits that they believe are going to be more advantageous to them. And with financial backing they publish "scientific studies" in their favor. If later on, they see that the traits they attributed to others(let's say, black people) are actually valuable or less valuable but more common with them, then they will re-brand their theories, adapt it, and with financial backing publish new "scientific studies" in their favor.
We see this with neanderthals or testosterone. Cacs used to say that black people are the ones with more neanderthal DNA. Now cacs say that Neanderthals had bigger brains, were smarter than modern humans (even though they were replaced and extinct, and made some of the worst tools when compared to hominids from their era).
Cacs used to say that high testosterone is bad for you and makes you extremely violent and it is the reason for the violent gene in Amerindians, African descendants or even in Maoris from New Zealand. However, now that they have noticed how they suffer from low testosterone and how it has made them extremely feminine(most feminine racial group on earth), they have been trying to re-brand themselves about it. You now hear things like blacks are more feminine and have more oestrogen.
I've seen this in many discussions. A cac will say "Blacks have the violent gene". A black dude will reply "Well, good, I will take the violent gene. Whites have the cuck gene."
And the same cac in the discussion will be like "Oh well, there is no cuck gene. You are just making everything up. Blacks are the ones more feminine."
Or even hairiness. Body hair and baldness. For instance, a commonality within all primates is their body hairiness. Monkeys, gorillas, macaques, proboscis etc are hairy. And Cacs are among the hairiest demographics. On average, way more hairy than blacks.
So, what happens when a lot of people start to notice this? You are inundated with a bunch of "studies" promoting hairiness and intelligence. You start hearing that hairiness is to adapt to cold weather but you hear zero explanations on how Siberians, for instance the Eskimos, are hairless despite having adapted themselves in extreme cold weathers. Basically, hairiness goes from a trait related to lack of evolution to something valuable that needs to be appreciated due to its relationship with intelligence.
"And a study of 117 Mensa members (who have an IQ of at least 140) were also found to have a tendency to thick body hair."
The hirsute of higher intelligence
A Penn State University study, arguing that hairy men are more intelligent:
Same for balding. Cacs are more likely to bald than blacks. And primates tend to bald, even more in captivity(or, living like us humans now).
So, what do you see next? Well, the usual...
"Study shows bald men are smarter, more successful and masculine"
"In other words, baldness might be the human equivalent of a male peacock’s ornate, brightly coloured tail. It might have evolved because it is attractive to women."
The benefits of going bald
Want to appear more intelligent, influential, educated and honest? Lose your hair.
Not enough? Okay, then what about cuckolding? By now, it is evident that whites are more into cuckolding than other groups. So what's next? You start seeing "studies" arguing that cuckolding is healthy and for intelligent people.
"Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony."
Cuckolding: The Sex Fetish for Intellectuals
It’s S&M for Ph.D.s: Cuckolding, in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQs who revel in the psychological agony.
"Cuckolding can be GOOD for couples: Watching your partner have sex with another person can strengthen your relationship, claim controversial scientists"
'Cuckolding' couples that act out cheating fantasies can be happier
Cuckolding can lead to couples who enjoy the 'most effective communication skills', according to a research led by Albuquerque-based psychologist Dr David Ley (stock image).
These might sound like minimal things but they are not. It is how they operate. If black people had 7 fingers, they would have published "studies" saying that 7 fingers are linked to lack of intelligence. If later on, a sizable number of whites worldwide were found to have 8 fingers, cacs would flip flop and say that 8 is greater than 7. So people with 8 fingers are more intelligent. It's how they function.
However, you and I won't be able to find a black billionaire willing to donate to us in case we try to do the same in favor of black people. Because Black billionaires or even multi-millionaires, are shielded and believe that it is a class issue, not race issue. Aliko Dangote or Robert Smith won't donate to shyt like this. Many black people end up abandoning these fields because they have zero financial support and some are even shunned by a sizable number of black people.
A cac shunned by the left, will get funding from a centrist or right-winger Cac billionaire or multi-millionaire, and vice-versa. But it's not the same for black people. You are shunned and that's it. Everyone starts acting like you are insane or bitter. How many black people have noticed so many physical and pathologically weird things about cacs but are forced to express their thoughts in a playful and sensitive way? A lot...
Funny, just saw this video today on Neil deGrasse Tyson also describing the Cac flip flopping process about Neanderthals
Unintentionally and moronically, Cacs are devaluing their opinions as more people find out about their modern and historical flip floppings. There are just too many and they can't project forever. Can't hide their insecurities and fragility anymore. Within the next years, as they lose demographics and economic power, we will also see non-whites starting to believe less and less in their propaganda. And that, to a group obsessed with faux morality and pointing fingers to others in order to deflect or project, will be a huge source of psychological damage.
Last edited:
All these tech bro nerds are on the same wave. They know they can’t compete without the help of science. Insecurity on 100.