The Optics Of This Rihanna Vogue Cover

VoxSphere74

Banned
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
2,147
Reputation
654
Daps
9,970
:skip:

What is the out of wedlock rate in the black community? How many black children are being raised in single parent households? How many black men are seriously interested in marriage, and being the head of household. Even The Coli is GMB.

To be honest, now that I think of it, this is an accurate vision. How many black adults grew up watching their mother do all the work? A man buying you sneakers, and hanging out time to time isn’t fathering.

Marriage rates in the Black community were actually just as high if not higher than they were in cac communities pre-integration. So Black people's desperation to be around cacs basically destroyed them. :francis:

And one could argue that their communities were artificially cohesive because of cac discrimination because that made them stay in their own neighborhoods with their own schools, businesses, and communities but most didn't want to be there they wanted to be around their racial tormentor due to self hate, brainwashing, and short term thinking.

And people are playing silly on the picture. It's clear on multiple levels that it makes Rihanna look bad like she doesn't want to be a mother and is unhappy with being in charge, ASAP is the maternal figure taking care of the kid and is the only one who cares even though he's the dad, and that they're not even close emotionally as evidenced by the distance in the photo.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
33,840
Reputation
7,968
Daps
183,374
What that poster is insinuating is that, given these pictures are of WM/BW couples and of homosexual black men, there’s a conspiracy against showing heterosexual black men in a positive light at Vogue magazine.
It’s British Vogue, and that man isn’t ADOS, if that makes a difference. But I’m not seeing the conspiracy.
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,463
Reputation
5,586
Daps
72,087
It’s British Vogue, and that man isn’t ADOS, if that makes a difference. But I’m not seeing the conspiracy.

I'm not sure what ADOS/FBA/diaspora wars has to do with this, but you're probably better off asking @WIA20XX himself about the full context of the post.

That was just my interpretation of the post.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Messages
12,037
Reputation
1,988
Daps
38,842
Reppin
Bucktown, U.S.A. (Harlem, NY) + 'Cuse, NY
Y'all nikkas read into shyt too much.

Clearly self-esteem issues on y'all end 🤷🏾‍♂️💯.

This constant need to dissect everything that you do and/or don't perceive to be masculine is a self-esteem issue, I looked at the cover and all I see is a husband and wife walking on the beach, holding hands and the father kissing his baby 🤷🏾‍♂️.

I don't see any shots and jabs at the man's masculinity, y'all just paranoid and have low self-esteem/self-conscious about yourself and project it on shyt like this.

This reminds me of another thread a few years ago similar to this where y'all nikkas was crying and shyt about the same thing 💀.
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,425
Daps
116,706
Until we control our own media, shyt like this will continue. Women can’t rule over men. I don’t support men ruling over women either.

We have to work together or the whole house crumbles.:yeshrug:
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
80,187
Reputation
11,010
Daps
216,136
these LGBTQ/Feminist gate keepers goal has been to emasculate & tear apart the "toxic strong black man" image for a minute...

this is one example out of many...

Its payback from the Superthug era of the 90s. Those "toxic" black men on magazine covers mean mugging and barking on violence scared them back then, and now they going on a revenge tour that is everlasting for the primary purpose of Black male EXTINCTION.
 
Top