FACTS
He may have a point, but he’s just as bias and messy as any blogger. He hates straight black men and never reports any news on them in an objective way.
FACTS
No he didn’t. He was the defense witness. Prosecutors mentioned they didn’t have time since it was last minute. Judge asked Tory’s defense team if they would like a continuance. Tory’s team declined.
Hence dude didn’t talk
Dude was on trial for “reckless discharge of a firearm”I literally been ignoring all this shyt until the verdict came out.... so you telling me that his star witness said that he did it and he DIDN'T do the common sense thing and hire a lawyer from California with political connections? Bro cooked himself
On god! These nikkas bet not never commit no crimes or just take that plea. Their knowledge of the workings of the law and court is in the negatives. Reading this thread you would think his attorneys were hitting it out the park only to get smacked with guilty on all charges after less than a full day of deliberations.
You're referring to Tory's driver
She's referring to Meg's bodyguard
They also did a disservice by not allowing the drive and bodyguard not testifying. They got too cocky for their own goods.His lawyers really dropped the ball, getting that taped reintroduced into evidence was a huge mistake that they should have seen coming with their line of questioning.
is it intentionally shooting her or intentionally discharging the firearm?The more I think about.....how do you get convicted of both intentional shooting someone and negligently shoot someone. Is that a discrepancy lol. Like....literally how do you fukk up that bad. It must been the suits, dude thought it was a game