hes always been a backup more of a special teams guy
Well of course he gonna take a paycut , unless he pulls a revis . regardless a paycut .
So those stats are useless bro.
I like the effort , put the effort twoards the link I put next to his stats. Those passing yards , td, qbr .
Schaub was always mediocre, it was just hidden by him throwing to Andre Johnson and handing off to Foster.
at best, he's a poor mans, poor mans Matt Stafford.
Schaub was always mediocre, it was just hidden by him throwing to Andre Johnson and handing off to Foster.
at best, he's a poor mans, poor mans Matt Stafford.
But there is nothing hidden with Stafford throwing to calvin johnson?
but lets just say there isn't, how come schuab has had a qbr over 90% six times, but stafford has only once ?
how come schuab completions percentage is higher every year with lower interceptions?
stafford just chugs the ball in the air to calvin , this man has had 19,17,16,20 interception seasons!
but why argue over schuab and stafford???
when we are choosing between schaub, vick , freeman, sanchez ?
Then why the hell you compare Shuab to Stafford in the first place? lmao ? Sounds like thier uncomparable to you?Nothing is hidden with Stafford throwing to him...cause that's his only option
they didn't have a running game, and they had to play catch-up in many games.
Nobody has had more attempts in a season than Stafford. you throw the ball 600-700 times a season, you're bound to throw a lot of picks.
not to mention, there were no Brian Cushings, Mario Williams or JJ Watt's playing in Detroit.
out of those options
1. Vick
2. Freeman
3. Schaub
4.Sanchez
Then why the hell you compare Shuab to Stafford in the first place? lmao ? Sounds like thier uncomparable to you?
Nd Mario williams been off the team for two years , cushing played 11 games in two years.
Dont act like Suh aint up thier with watt .
But this debate is a smoke screen .
So vick and freeman over schuab? hmm care to share why?
Vick brings an added dimension to the offense that Freeman can't....although Freeman is the better passer, Vick brings more to the table.
With Vick, it'll be a more attractive situation to potential free agents to want to play in....Freeman doesn't exactly have that type of name for himself around the league.
Vick will also put asses in the seats, just cause people still believe that he still has something left in the tank.
i like Freeman over Schaub, just because if it came down to just having a guy who's there just to be a game manager, without many weapons around him....he's been able to perform fairly well at it... plus he has a stronger arm than Schaub, and is more mobile.
Thanks.
We agree on Freeman being our second choice( ill add on... due to size and age. )
I don't think Bridge is going to be the answer for us brehs. I like Bridge, but I think I might be starting to lean towards Johnny fukkery brehs if we take a QB at 5. But, would prefer taking Mack or Watkins at 5, or trading back and I guess I wouldn't mind taking Carr than in the 2nd round than.
I don't think Bridge is going to be the answer for us brehs. I like Bridge, but I think I might be starting to lean towards Johnny fukkery brehs if we take a QB at 5. But, would prefer taking Mack or Watkins at 5, or trading back and I guess I wouldn't mind taking Carr than in the 2nd round than.