Rodgers is gonna be 41 with very minimal mobility. There’s a good chance he’s one and done and then we’re searching again for another QB this off season. Geno Smith is a much better option for where the Raiders are currently. He’s a viable QB in the immediate that allows the team to be competitive and not have to reach for a QB in this draft or next years draft. Rodgers makes more sense for a team that is Super Bowl built on a high risk/high reward deal. It doesn’t make much sense for a team looking for stability and we don’t need the extra baggage and drama he brings. We need to get away from them types.Yeah, imagine trading draft picks for geno smith. Raiders trash. Yall coulda just offered Rodgers a contract. I keep hearing gow he's done, he had a better yr than Gino imo
Only problem I see is Geno is turning 35 next season. So you’ll still likely be looking for a QB in a year or two anyway. Giving up a 3rd and signing him to a big-ish contract is going to limit the team’s upside for a few years. Plus it’s not like the Raiders are loaded with talent across the board and just need a QB to compete. It’d be different if the Raiders were in a weak division. The team probably should just bottom out for another year or two while stockpiling assets, not give up a 3rd for what’ll end up being a stopgap QB.Rodgers is gonna be 41 with very minimal mobility. There’s a good chance he’s one and done and then we’re searching again for another QB this off season. Geno Smith is a much better option for where the Raiders are currently. He’s a viable QB in the immediate that allows the team to be competitive and not have to reach for a QB in this draft or next years draft. Rodgers makes more sense for a team that is Super Bowl built on a high risk/high reward deal. It doesn’t make much sense for a team looking for stability and we don’t need the extra baggage and drama he brings. We need to get away from them types.
A third rounder for a good starting QB is a steal, especially when we have a stockpile of picks. The Raiders have two third round picks because we have the Jets pick from the Adams trade.
I think Geno definitely has a ceiling but I think we're about 2 off seasons and 2 drafts away from being SB viable (baring everything goes right) and then we should have drafted our next future QB to play under Geno until he's ready. That's why I'm not tripping about that part.Only problem I see is Geno is turning 35 next season. So you’ll still likely be looking for a QB in a year or two anyway. Giving up a 3rd and signing him to a big-ish contract is going to limit the team’s upside for a few years. Plus it’s not like the Raiders are loaded with talent across the board and just need a QB to compete. It’d be different if the Raiders were in a weak division. The team probably should just bottom out for another year or two while stockpiling assets, not give up a 3rd for what’ll end up being a stopgap QB.
Geno is basically black Derek Carr with more mobility. He’ll be above average at the position, while we can find our QB of the future. Geno at the very least can get the offense to be respectable and is a vast improvement over last year.
More importantly, the Raiders need to put a competitive team on the field so actual Raiders fans will be compelled to fill the stands in Vegas. The last three seasons have been embarrassing as far as visiting fans filling the stands.
So far so good from Spyteck and Pete.
apparently seahawks traded Geno within a day of sitting down with him/his agent discussing terms of the new deal because they wanted to extend himI like this move, as long as they don't give Geno some blockbuster contract. Allows us to draft smarter instead of reaching for a QB. With the soft schedule next year, improved health on the defense, we can win 10-11 games. Maybe draft a QB 3rd rd and develop them for a couple of years.