DougFunnY
Make it a win
No they didn't stop lying. They posted that video about a month earlier around the Portland card
No they didnt. Believe what u want tho idc
No they didn't stop lying. They posted that video about a month earlier around the Portland card
beautiful form of violenceWhat a dumb question, that's like citing all the terrorists acts in the last 15 years and asking a Muslim you still down with that? Errrr why should he/she give up their religion because of a group of psychopaths? You are probably one of those that rolls your eyes when you hear of the racial injustices in The US and say "if you hate America so much why don't you leave". Is it for the person to leave or is it for America to change? Think about it.
The fuk , why would I deprive myself of a beautiful form of violence just because of the reprobates attached to it?
They could have easily showed his palhares and maia finishes which errrr actually happened in the UFCMarquadt was headlining some prelims a month before and that's he's best win in his entire career
What a dumb question, that's like citing all the terrorists acts in the last 15 years and asking a Muslim you still down with that? Errrr why should he/she give up their religion because of a group of psychopaths? You are probably one of those that rolls your eyes when you hear of the racial injustices in The US and say "if you hate America so much why don't you leave". Is it for the person to leave or is it for America to change? Think about it.
The fuk , why would I deprive myself of a beautiful form of violence just because of the reprobates attached to it?
They could have easily showed his palhares and maia finishes which errrr actually happened in the UFC
stop it
No they didnt. Believe what u want tho idc
The clip they showed was the sequence proceeding the KO to the actual ko. The caption read as 'remember when nate marquart did this to the current ww champ' At no time in that clip or any promo footage do they allude to nate winning the strap in that fight..and even if they did? Let's be frank he's a prelims dweller from here and beyond, selling his fight pass headlined fight at the expense of the welterweight champion is just counterintuitive. To deny or defend it is just ridiculous,what they did, at best? Was clumsy and at worst? Was just disrespectfulOr they could have shown the fight that won him the fukking SF title
Stop it
The clip they showed was the sequence proceeding the KO to the actual ko. The caption read as 'remember when nate marquart did this to the current ww champ' At no time in that clip or any promo footage do they allude to nate winning the strap in that fight..and even if they did? Let's be frank he's a prelims dweller from here and beyond, selling his fight pass headlined fight at the expense of the welterweight champion is just counterintuitive. To deny or defend it is just ridiculous,what they did, at best? Was clumsy and at worst? Was just disrespectful
We saw with the 207 promos how they handle things with kid gloves
Woodley doesn't have the personality to play characters for that you have to be a show man or in many ways cunning..What exactly is the endgame, to cite racism to the bank? You know in the UFC if the fans hate you that means they won't pay to watch you fight right?"I know when someone is playing a persona" you don't know anything, if you listen to his morning wood show as he was explaining this very same topic he had to cut it early because it pissed him off even talking about it. And are you honestly going to pretend the reaction to what Woodley did when he won and what bisbing did were the same? Because they requested the same damn thing yet Woodley got the worse reaction why is that? Was there not a longer queue at MW?I don't roll my eyes at true racism. And I don't deny there are racist fans. But I know when someone is playing a persona to sell a character. So sorry if I'm not a simple minded ambulance chaser like you try hard
Just because there's racism everywhere doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out. If anything I'd take the opposite position.
And you admit that there's racism in MMA? Why is it "race-baiting" or trolling to mention it if even you can acknowledge that it's legit?
yeah because seeing maia and palhares finished wouldn't have hyped that meaningless fight at all.
Once again, Portland fight was about a month before NYC. They try to hype their subscription service
I know you get easily confused but I used 207 as an example as to how UFC are purposeful in how they do things. 207 they gave Ronda a video reel, no footage of the fight or nunes even. UFC 168 'leave no doubt'couldn't stop showing Anderson's KO.207 you are talking about the main event and a huge draw. Don't even understand that comparison
Woodley doesn't have the personality to play characters for that you have to be a show man or in many ways cunning..What exactly is the endgame, to cite racism to the bank? You know in the UFC if the fans hate you that means they won't pay to watch you fight right?"I know when someone is playing a persona" you don't know anything, if you listen to his morning wood show as he was explaining this very same topic he had to cut it early because it pissed him off even talking about it. And are you honestly going to pretend the reaction to what Woodley did when he won and what bisbing did were the same? Because they requested the same damn thing yet Woodley got the worse reaction why is that? Was there not a longer queue at MW?
Tell me again what Woodley has done to receive the amount of hate he received at NY press conference and social media?