The Official "Joe Rogan Experience" Podcast Thread

[storyteller]

Candace Owens was a good listening experience for me. That girl is trained and cued up with stories and answers to really mislead an entire generation if they fall for it, and that Kanye co-sign scares me because of it. She's pretty see through to anyone that really sits back and listens but she's got the new Conservative tactic of rapid fire tangents that mix in a couple of truths with a bunch of leaps in logic to push really foul views. This girl really said she was with a family out of Iraq that wept watching Obama speak because he had the mannerisms of a dictator ...foh. I'm glad Joe didn't let her sneak through the Climate Change ish and you could tell in that convo that her contract with Turning Point would be voided with the quickness if she went with her conscious like that one time Tomi Lahren slipped up and went pro-choice. I'm glad he called her out as someone who sounds like a politician, that's exactly the type of media training she seems like she got and ain't a single thought out her mouth original or new. It's a trip that I watched that interview and the next day saw a clip where Sam Seder mentioned how Owens was mocking tea party conservatives and Trump for a website less than two years ago too...I wonder what the going rate is to give yourself up to the sunken place.

Edit: Found the term for the technique...this ish is happening with a gang of pseudo intellectuals from Peterson and Harris to the more blatantly political like Shapiro and Owens throughout Joe's podcast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

"Gish gallop" is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.

The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently against science-based opponents on the topic of evolution.

 

[storyteller]

After all of the ego deaths and 5 meo dmt trips you'd think he'd be less of an ideologue.I do like the ppl he interviews though. Graham Hancock is always nice to see.

He had a Graham Hancock style guest this week that was one of my favorite interviews in a while. When he sticks to academics and fighters, the show is still golden.

 

[Take It In Blood]

 

[Skeptic]

Joe has all sorts on his show, and he rarely verbally disagrees with anyone. If you can get past that, the show is consumable depending on the guest.

 

[ogc163]

Asian's are the victim's of excellent genetics

 

[ogc163]

"Once people start talking crazy about George Soro's I'm out"



Joe is the typical "bro" who because they have better than average social skills folks can falsely believe they are much cooler/progressive than they really are.

 

[88m3]

dude always stuck me as a weirdo "libertarian"

 

[Skeptic]

I'm watching Joe Rogan live right now and he's complaining about how just because his views don't go lock-step with SJW's, he's labeled a conservative when in reality most of his views are progressive. At the same time I'm reading this thread and it totally corroborates what he's saying.

 

[Robbie3000]

I'm watching Joe Rogan live right now and he's complaining about how just because his views don't go lock-step with SJW's, he's labeled a conservative when in reality most of his views are progressive. At the same time I'm reading this thread and it totally corroborates what he's saying.

The problem with Joe is that he is a chameleon. He morphs into whoever is in front of him.

When he has a liberal guest, he sounds like a liberal. When he has a conservative guests, he sounds like a conservative.

He is also not very well versed in politics. He should stick to MMA and comedy.

 

[ogc163]

I'm watching Joe Rogan live right now and he's complaining about how just because his views don't go lock-step with SJW's, he's labeled a conservative when in reality most of his views are progressive. At the same time I'm reading this thread and it totally corroborates what he's saying.

Nah, I don't even have major beef with Joe but that's bullshyt. A good portion of his statements when it comes to poverty, lack of social mobility, and wealth have a shallow "pull yourself up" slant that doesn't take into ample consideration institutions and places more emphasis on individual decisions/actions.

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

say what you will about his choice of guests.
he should have more people of color on the show.
he should have more women on the show.
he should have more of whatever you want on the show.

what he does right is that the long form interview gives the guest more than enough rope to hang themselves with.
after listening to a three hour conversation with someone, you get a much better look into their mindset.

at the end of the day he is a 50 plus year old white guy with a talent for talking to people and making it interesting for others to listen too.

 

[ogc163]

 

[PoorAndDangerous]

He had a Graham Hancock style guest this week that was one of my favorite interviews in a while. When he sticks to academics and fighters, the show is still golden.

Rogans show has always been dependent on the guest, if he wants to have a right wing cuck on his show just don't listen to that episode. That also doesn't mean that rogan is a right winger.

 

[Skeptic]

The problem with Joe is that he is a chameleon. He morphs into whoever is in front of him.

When he has a liberal guest, he sounds like a liberal. When he has a conservative guests, he sounds like a conservative.

He is also not very well versed in politics. He should stick to MMA and comedy.

I've mentioned that before in this thread that he rarely attacks the ideas of his guests. My guess is that he doesn't want anyone to be afraid to be on his show.
I think he'd agree with you that he's not very well versed in politics.

Nah, I don't even have major beef with Joe but that's bullshyt. A good portion of his statements when it comes to poverty, lack of social mobility, and wealth have a shallow "pull yourself up" slant that doesn't take into ample consideration institutions and places more emphasis on individual decisions/actions.

Well, look who he is. He's made himself a millionaire (even though he'd probably admit that he's had his fare share of lucky breaks). When you're living that life it's hard to imagine how anyone else couldn't live that life even though you know it doesn't really work that way.

 

[dza]

Dave rubin is a fukkin idiot