England was better (and this was expected to be honest, I've been rated them highly for the longest) but we were more clinical which is what matters untimately. A tournament needs to be won, not played well.
I don't think England had that many clear cut chances to say that they should have beaten us today. The best chances really were the two pens and otherwise they were ordinary
Considering how shaky our backline is, it either means that we're not too bad at defending in open play or England attack was not that good.
Refs did miss some fouls and maybe he did lean towards France overall I can agree with that but let's also be honest that some English players fell quite easily. Footy is still a contact sport.
I think ref had a good game except the close free kick on Saka in the first half that the VAR didnt confirm but should have IMO.