The Official Chinese 🇨🇳 Espionage & Cold War Thread

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
32,779
Reputation
1,406
Daps
60,959
Reppin
got a call for three nines
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State
:whoo:


China, India Kick Out Nearly All of Each Other’s Journalists as Rivalry Escalates
Rift that opened with deadly border clash deepens as neighbors deny reporter visas

Keith ZhaiMay 30, 2023 at 11:24 am ET

SINGAPORE—India and China have ejected each other’s journalists in recent weeks, virtually wiping out mutual media access and deepening a rift between the world’s two most populous nations.

New Delhi denied visa renewals this month to the last two remaining Chinese state media journalists in the country, from state-run Xinhua News Agency and China Central Television, according to people familiar with the matter.

Indian media outlets had four remaining journalists based in China at the beginning of the year. At least two of them haven’t been granted visas to return to the country, a Chinese official said. A third was told this month that his accreditation had been revoked but he remains in the country, people familiar with the matter said.

The reciprocal moves are likely to add to acrimony between the two neighbors, whose relationship has deteriorated since a deadly brawl on the contested Sino-Indian border in June 2020. Since then, a once-warming relationship between the two members of the so-called Brics grouping of emerging powers has grown testy, spilling over into a wide-ranging bilateral dispute.


5:29
0:00 / 5:33
China has been the most populous nation in the world since at least 1750. But in April, India’s population is set to surpass China’s. WSJ examines what this shift in population could mean for the future of each country, as well as the global economy. Photo illustration: Jacob Anderson Nelson/WSJ
India has shifted toward more active participation in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, the U.S.-led grouping known as the Quad that also includes Australia and Japan, and which China regards as an attempt to encircle and contain it.

Ties between New Delhi and Beijing have soured in other ways. India has banned dozens of Chinese mobile apps, including TikTok, WeChat and other global hits with roots in China, effectively locking them out of the fast-growing Indian market.

In recent months, China has renamed certain features in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, which Beijing claims almost in its entirety and calls South Tibet.

China boycotted a Group of 20 working group meeting on tourism after India, as host, decided to hold the meeting this month in the territory of Kashmir. The region has been at the center of a dispute between India and Pakistan since partition in 1947, with both countries claiming it in full but only controlling parts of it. China’s territorial disputes with India include the abutting strategic area of Ladakh.

The journalist ejections add another dimension to the fraying ties between China and India, reducing exchanges and visibility between two nuclear-armed neighbors whose combined population accounts for more than one-third of the world’s total.

“The presence of more journalists from China in India would help to bridge the gap between the two countries and foster a deeper understanding of each other’s cultures and perspectives,” said Wang Zichen, a former Chinese state media reporter who now works as a research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, a Beijing think tank. “This, in turn, could lead to a reduction in hostility and a more peaceful resolution to the border dispute.”

Journalist accreditation has risen in prominence as a geopolitical issue in recent years, as governments increasingly regard members of the press as extensions of their home countries’ foreign policies. In early 2020, China expelled more than a dozen American reporters, including for The Wall Street Journal, while the U.S. capped the number of accreditations for Chinese journalists. All of Australia’s foreign correspondents left China later that year amid escalating tensions between the two countries.

A record number of journalists were imprisoned in 2022, the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said last month. In March, Russia detained Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich on an allegation of espionage that the Journal and the U.S. government vehemently deny.

The moves by China and India to virtually freeze out the other side show how quickly ties can deteriorate.

Advertisement - Scroll to Continue

The last two remaining Chinese state media journalists have departed the country following the expiration of their visas, according to people familiar with the matter. There are now no remaining Chinese state media reporters in India, some of them said, likely for the first time since at least the 1980s.

China has likewise denied credentials for Indian journalists. Last month, reporters for the Hindu, one of India’s largest newspapers, and Prasar Bharati, New Delhi’s state-owned public broadcaster, who were traveling outside China, were barred from returning, while a reporter for the Hindustan Times was told this month that his press credentials were being invalidated, according to people familiar with the matter.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning last month described the barring of the Hindu and Prasar Bharati reporters as “appropriate countermeasures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese media organizations” after India began tightening its rules on Chinese journalists beginning in 2017, including reducing some visa periods to just one month. The spokeswoman mentioned at the time that two other Indian outlets still had journalists in China. A spokesman for India’s Embassy in Beijing didn’t respond to requests for comment.

A spokesman for India’s Ministry of External Affairs declined to discuss the details of visas for individual journalists. He pointed to April comments in which he had said Chinese journalists continue to work in India and the government hoped China would allow Indian journalists to work there.

Over the years, India has increasingly limited the duration of stay for Chinese journalists. In 2016, India refused to extend visas for three Xinhua journalists, including its then-bureau chief in New Delhi, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

In December, a Chinese state television reporter was unexpectedly ordered to leave India within 10 days, despite holding a valid visa, and given no explanation, China’s Foreign Ministry said in its statement this month. The spokesman for the Indian government didn’t respond to a question about this claim.

The dispute over journalists reflects the depth of the chill that has been cast over bilateral relations since the border clash in June 2020. India’s Foreign Minister, S. Jaishankar, has said relations can’t return to normal until there is peace along the shared border.

“The ball is in China’s court,” said Srikanth Kondapalli, a professor of international relations at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. “If they want relations to be improved, they have to vacate the land that they occupied.”

Krishna Pokharel in New Delhi contributed to this article.

Write to Keith Zhai at keith.zhai@wsj.com
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State

CIA chief made secret visit to China in bid to thaw relations
Bill Burns’ trip last month was most senior to Beijing by Biden administration official

8 hours ago
CIA director Bill Burns
CIA director Bill Burns met counterparts in Beijing © Al Drago/Bloomberg
CIA director Bill Burns travelled to China last month, a clandestine visit by one of President Joe Biden’s most trusted officials that signals how concerned the White House had become about deteriorating relations between Beijing and Washington.

Five people familiar with the situation said Burns, a former top diplomat who is frequently entrusted with delicate overseas missions, travelled to China for talks with officials. Another person stressed that Burns did not have any diplomatic engagements, and only met intelligence officials.

The visit, the most senior to China by a Biden administration official, comes as Washington pushes for high-level engagements with Beijing to try to stabilise the relationship.

“Last month, director Burns travelled to Beijing where he met with Chinese counterparts and emphasised the importance of maintaining open lines of communications in intelligence channels,” said one US official.

The White House and CIA declined to comment.

Burns’ mission took place in the same month US national security adviser Jake Sullivan met Wang Yi, China’s top foreign policy official, in Vienna. The White House did not announce that meeting until it had concluded.

Burns’ trip was also the highest-level visit to China by a US official since deputy secretary of state Wendy Sherman went to Tianjin in July 2021.

Biden has on several occasions asked the CIA director to conduct delicate missions, at home and overseas. Burns travelled to Moscow in November 2021 to warn Russian officials not to invade Ukraine.

Several people familiar with the situation said Biden last year sent Burns to Capitol Hill in an effort to persuade then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi not to travel to Taiwan.

The White House has been trying to kick-start exchanges with China after a particularly turbulent period that started in February when a suspected Chinese spy balloon flew over North America. The incident derailed an effort to set “a floor” under the relationship that Biden and Chinese president Xi Jinping had agreed was necessary when they met at the G20 in Bali in November.

Biden last month said he expected an imminent “thaw” in relations without providing any detail. Burns travelled to China before Biden made the comment at a G7 summit in Hiroshima.

“As both an experienced diplomat and senior intelligence official, Burns is uniquely placed to engage in a dialogue that can potentially contribute to the Biden administration’s objective of stabilising ties and putting a floor under the relationship,” said Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the German Marshall Fund.

Paul Haenle, a former top White House China official, said one advantage of sending Burns was that he was respected by Democrats and Republicans and also well known to Chinese officials.

“They know him as a trusted interlocutor. They would welcome the opportunity to engage him quietly behind the scenes,” said Haenle, now director of the Carnegie China think-tank. “They will see a quiet discreet engagement with Burns as a perfect opportunity.”

While Burns is widely viewed as one of the most trusted figures in the US government, his trip continues a tradition of CIA directors being used for sensitive missions.

“CIA directors have a long history of secret diplomacy. They are able to travel in complete secrecy and often have strong relationships with the host intelligence services built over time,” said Dennis Wilder, a former CIA China expert who also served as the top White House Asia official during the George W Bush administration.

The US has been trying to resurrect a trip to China that secretary of state Antony Blinken abruptly cancelled over the balloon incident, but Beijing has so far refused to give it a green light.

Chinese defence minister Li Shangfu has also refused to meet US defence secretary Lloyd Austin in Singapore this weekend because Washington has refused to lift sanctions on him. The two men are attending the Shangri-La Dialogue security conference where they are slated to give speeches.

While the two ministers were not expected to have a formal meeting, the Pentagon said they “spoke briefly” at the opening dinner of the forum, which is held by the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

“The two leaders shook hands, but did not have a substantive exchange,” the Pentagon said.
 
Top