Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,732
Reputation
1,040
Daps
25,583
assuming Crawford ducks anyone :mjlol:

He called out Thurman and Pac but sure he's gonna duck now

after he beats Indongo they gonna make the Pac fight imo...
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
man it would be different coming from someone else but u always say/insinuate craw ducking someone. same with postol/felix.

sounds like trolling:yeshrug:


Show me receipts of where I ever said Crawford was ducking Postol or Diaz:comeon:


You may have took it that way, because you really like Crawford, but you will never be able to pull up me saying he was ducking, avoiding, or afraid of a Postol or Diaz:usure:


Also....there are coli posters I've told face to face the same thing, and I've also told them Crawford is a great fighter. HOWEVER, him facing Broner or Garcia is not in the plans. Arum just said that the goal is for Crawford to acquire all the belts at 140, so being that Broner/Garcia will not have a belt, we can safely assume that Crawford will not be fighting either of them next and instead it would be the lesser fighter at 140 with a belt.:manny:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
assuming Crawford ducks anyone :mjlol:

He called out Thurman and Pac but sure he's gonna duck now

after he beats Indongo they gonna make the Pac fight imo...
Show me receipts of where I ever said Crawford was ducking Postol or Diaz:comeon:


You may have took it that way, because you really like Crawford, but you will never be able to pull up me saying he was ducking, avoiding, or afraid of a Postol or Diaz:usure:


Stop trolling yall & be serious for a second:snoop:


If no receipts to back up your claims then :ufdup:


If you REALLY believe Crawford is going after Broner/Garcia next, and not Lipinets, then put your avi's up for 1 week:ufdup:


Other then that, we done here bc even you don't believe it but wanna type it to me:ld:
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,732
Reputation
1,040
Daps
25,583
Stop trolling yall & be serious for a second:snoop:


If no receipts then :ufdup:


If you REALLY believe Crawford is going after Broner/Garcia next, and not Lipinets, then put your avi's up for 1 week:ufdup:


Other then that, we done here bc even you don't believe it but wanna type it to me:ld:
nah I hope he will fight Indongo for all 4 belts and Lipinets can go kick rocks

Crawford always fought the best available opponents in any division he competed, you can't point him out as a ducker
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
nah I hope he will fight Indongo for all 4 belts and Lipinets can go kick rocks

Indongo wont have 2 belts vs Crawford....he's getting stripped.



Crawford always fought the best available opponents in any division he competed, you can't point him out as a ducker

Who called him a ducker?:jbhmm:



For the millionth time, I will type it again:


Crawford will NOT be facing the winner of Broner/Garcia next....he will instead face a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt.


If any of you disagree, put your avi's up or sit down:hubie:
 

krackdagawd

Inspire.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
45,776
Reputation
8,275
Daps
140,088
Reppin
Another Gold Medal
Im going full @krackdagawd on people now, Im not about to have these debates anymore:ld:


If you truly believe what you saying, then either put your avis up or sit down:manny:


#SOGGang taught us what being men of our convictions will get us :mjgrin:

When these nikkas were all "how can he be p4p when he only fight on leap year :camby:"


Look at us now :mjcry: UNIVERSALLY #1 p4p and nothing they can do about it. :wow:
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,732
Reputation
1,040
Daps
25,583
Indongo wont have 2 belts vs Crawford....he's getting stripped.





Who called him a ducker?:jbhmm:



For the millionth time, I will type it again:


Crawford will NOT be facing the winner of Broner/Garcia next....he will instead face a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt.


If any of you disagree, put your avi's up or sit down:hubie:

Yeah but that's my problem here. Aren't you accusing him with ducking with that?

And no avi bets from me not for anything I tell this to y'all not just you. Always thought it's a stupid shyt to let yourself be humiliated online just because you were simply wrong in something.
I won't give that opportunity to anyone breh :ld:
I don't even bet irl in money...
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
Yeah but that's my problem here. Aren't you accusing him with ducking with that?

You Crawford stans are becoming a sensitive bunch:heh:


Accusing him of ducking? I've never said he was ducking the winner of Broner/Garcia even once:dead:


So in 2017, it's ducking to say someone will fight someone else, because the promoter has already said that Crawford is looking to unfiy the division & neither of them (Broner/Garcia) has a 140 Championship?:dwillhuh:


I mean breh...come on now. You want @LinusCaldwell to ask a question, if the winner of Broner/Garcia are planning to face Crawford next, when it's already known that Crawford will be looking to grab the 4th belt next (once Indongo is stripped). That's where the statement comes from:


Crawford will NOT be facing the winner of Broner/Garcia next....he will instead face a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt.


That lesser fighter will be Sergey Lipinets if the IBF doesn't budge, unless you would like to put out there that Lipinets > Broner/Garcia winner.:ld:




And no avi bets from me not for anything I tell this to y'all not just you. Always thought it's a stupid shyt to let yourself be humiliated online just because you were simply wrong in something.
I won't give that opportunity to anyone breh :ld:
I don't even bet irl in money...

If you're wrong, you have to pay for pushing wrong information:hubie:


I would be accepting the avi bet as well, and it's only a week....surely if you believe Crawford will go after the Broner/Garcia winner next, instead of a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt, it should be no problem in having my avi for a week:obama:
 

ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA

Return of the Khryst
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
77,972
Reputation
9,520
Daps
120,309
Reppin
ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA
Iyanna Mayweather‏ @moneyyaya
Mikey Garcia is gon beat Adrien Broner
1f937-1f3fd-200d-2640-fe0f.png
1f4af.png


:mjpls:
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,732
Reputation
1,040
Daps
25,583
You Crawford stans are becoming a sensitive bunch:heh:


Accusing him of ducking? I've never said he was ducking the winner of Broner/Garcia even once:dead:


So in 2017, it's ducking to say someone will fight someone else, because the promoter has already said that Crawford is looking to unfiy the division & neither of them (Broner/Garcia) has a 140 Championship?:dwillhuh:


I mean breh...come on now. You want @LinusCaldwell to ask a question, if the winner of Broner/Garcia are planning to face Crawford next, when it's already known that Crawford will be looking to grab the 4th belt next (once Indongo is stripped). That's where the statement comes from:


Crawford will NOT be facing the winner of Broner/Garcia next....he will instead face a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt.


That lesser fighter will be Sergey Lipinets if the IBF doesn't budge, unless you would like to put out there that Lipinets > Broner/Garcia winner.:ld:






If you're wrong, you have to pay for pushing wrong information:hubie:


I would be accepting the avi bet as well, and it's only a week....surely if you believe Crawford will go after the Broner/Garcia winner next, instead of a lesser fighter at 140 with a belt, it should be no problem in having my avi for a week:obama:

The starting problem is that you take it granted that Indongo will be stripped while I think he won't, Hearn also said the fight is gonna be for all 4 belts. If Indingo is stripped idk what's next but I think he won't.

Joshua recently granted an exception by tge IBF because of a rematch clause I think there's a good chance that Indingo will get that too with an arguably even stronger case (belt orgs officially put unifications ahead of mandatories) and he has also good connections in Hearn and by the way of Crawford Arum too.

As for the avi bet part you say pushing wrong information but that's not true because there's difference between personal opinion and "information". We are here to share our opinions on boxing should we all make bets now if someone doesn't agree with us? fukk that... we don't need to be punished for opinions especially that they are nit even extremist in this case.

Also I could only lose on this since I have no interest to make you or any other users rocking avis they don't want to so even if I'd win there would be nothing for me threre.
 
Top