Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

yo moms

yo moms

drunk
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
21,895
Reputation
-164
Daps
24,062
Newzz said:



Nobody that fights in a stance like this would win a fight against a Top 10 Heavyweight of today....sorry yall:birdman:
Click to expand...


really. jack johnson wouldnt win a fight against a top 10 heavyweight of today? STOP IT SLIME :camby:

and that was a photo pose before the fight even started.
 
LauderdaleBoss

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,474
Reputation
5,213
Daps
57,407
Reppin
Lauderdale
Crawford would beat the shyt outta Marquez

Cotto would too, but at least you have the whole PR vs Mexico angle for the sales boost.
 
Newzz

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
ogkush99 said:
really. jack johnson wouldnt win a fight against a top 10 heavyweight of today? STOP IT SLIME :camby:

and that was a photo pose before the fight even started.
Click to expand...

Nope...he wouldn't. Not standing like that.:camby:


Jack Johnson only had a 74'' reach, and was 6'2 210. He wouldnt do anything today of significance at Heavyweight. He fought in a lean back stance, clinched excessively, PLUS he didn't even keep his right hand up:usure:



I didnt mean to put the Top 10 Heavyweights Of Today, which is why I edited to Luis Ortiz, I meant to put the The Top 10 Heavyweights of This Era (last 30 years) would destroy him.


Let the greats be great in THEIR era.
 
yo moms

yo moms

drunk
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
21,895
Reputation
-164
Daps
24,062
Newzz said:
Nope...he wouldn't. Not standing like that.:camby:


Jack Johnson only had a 74'' reach, and was 6'2 210. He wouldnt do anything today of significance at Heavyweight. He fought in a lean back stance and clinched excessively, PLUS he didn't even keep his right hand up:usure:
Click to expand...

im not even going to argue this bullshyt. you dont seem educated on jack johnson at all.
 
Newzz

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
ogkush99 said:
im not even going to argue this bullshyt. you dont seem educated on jack johnson at all.
Click to expand...


Again...Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Jess Willard, etc faced only THEIR competition in THEIR era. Competition was extremely watered down back in the early 1900s.



Jack Johnson's best opponent he faced was vs Sam Langford....a fight where Johnson entered the ring at 6'0 185lbs against Langford who was only 5'7 156lbs:comeon:



You telling me that any Cruiserweight of today wouldnt KO Canelo:usure:?????


The "Golden Agers" get ton of props for fighting in extreme mismatches, fights that wouldnt even be ALLOWED to be sanctioned today, so I suggest you educate yourself on Johnson's (and the rest of the fighters from that era) fights. There were serious mismatches all over the place, and only in the modern era are they held against the fighters:


"Bu-bu-but, Canelo is 155...Khan is 147. Canelo is too big:mjcry:" while Johnson (at 6'0 192lbs for the fight) won the Heavyweight Championship by beating Tommy Burns....who was only 5'7 168lbs at the time of the fight:snoop:



Give any fighter today a 5 inch height plus a damn near 30lbs weight advantage over their opponent:wow:
 
Last edited:
yo moms

yo moms

drunk
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
21,895
Reputation
-164
Daps
24,062
im not getting emotionally involved in your trolling today :hula:

ive done my research. i apply jack johnson techniques in boxing today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top