Ricky Burns it's just as bad of a matchup as Broner vs Theophane with Burns not even being ranked by the IBF, WBC, or WBO at 140. WBA has him at the #14 spot....right in front of Theophane who's #15.
The backlash needs to be the same if that fight happens.
Just imagine if it was AB vs Burns for the 140 WBA announced
postol would beat broner.
Postol is ranked #1 by RING (while Broner is #5), #1 by TBRB (while Broner is #7), and #2 by ESPN (while Broner is #3).
If people give Postol a pass for fighting the WBA's #14 ranked (if it happens), while talking down on Broner for fighting the WBA's #15 ranked....
Is postol even TR?
This the thing though. Crawford don't seem to want that fight. Of we shytting on this we shytting on Crawford vs londy too...well it didn't help omar's case that the majority of ppl thought he lost that fight too lol..4 cats on here all scored that shyt 114-112 for burns
but i dont think postol vs burns is a good fight either...granados earned that shot at postol by beating imam...i want that instead
Ala Ponce? You are correct sir.postol would beat broner.
Question... Is Martin a Al haymon fighter?
This the thing though. Crawford don't seem to want that fight. Of we shytting on this we shytting on Crawford vs londy too...