Facts, only on the coli is it not
I think with Tank, folks around here are a bit more honest about his lackluster resume. But who knows? The Coli is really inconsistent with their hate and appreciation.
I hear you and I guess you have a point. But let's keep it a stack. nikkas only bring up Crawford's resume because of what he did to Spence and in defense of Spence. I'm not saying that's you. I believe you're being sincere in your assessment. But not the rest of these nikkas.Basically
Both Tank and Crawford's resumes are underwhelming for their talent and skill set, but only one gets constantly shytted on for it.
16 years of pro boxing and Spence, Madrimov, Porter, Postol, and Gamboa are your biggest names.
You the face of boxing and LSC, Barrios, Martin, Garcias 2x, are your biggest names.
Like yeah ya'll nikkas are HOF no doubt, but all the twitter posts and discussions about these 2 being all time greats and beating up guys like Floyd and Duran in their primes is going overboard.
its almost comical how wrong @R=G has been...when you dont have a boxing eye, you say anything hopes that it will stick lol..the shyt he said with bivol and canelo is like an outlier now for him hahaI hear you and I guess you have a point. But let's keep it a stack. nikkas only bring up Crawford's resume because of what he did to Spence and in defense of Spence. I'm not saying that's you. I believe you're being sincere in your assessment. But not the rest of these nikkas.
@R=G brought up an amateur opponent as to why Crawford wasn't that good. nikkas are posting anything to take the sting off that asswhuppin'.
I hear you and I guess you have a point. But let's keep it a stack. nikkas only bring up Crawford's resume because of what he did to Spence and in defense of Spence. I'm not saying that's you. I believe you're being sincere in your assessment. But not the rest of these nikkas.
@R=G brought up an amateur opponent as to why Crawford wasn't that good. nikkas are posting anything to take the sting off that asswhuppin'.