UpAndComing
Veteran
Another dude who called it PERFECTLY on how the fight would happen. Those defensive flaws he got away with for years, made it easy for Crawford
Dude is probably a Coli member already

gutierrez KO was such an upset...but rocky has been beasting on those matchroom mexican cards...either foster wins by decision or rocky knocks him out...thats the only way i see this fight endingThis should be good, I remember Eduardo Hernandez was lauded as one of the best Mexican prospects before he was knocked out in 1 by Roger Gutierrez. Still young, just 25, will be interesting if he's ready now, but he hasn't fought anyone since who would prepare him for this level, it will be quite the jump.
Foster has been impressive in recent years, I expect him to bring his usual form
This is fukkin dumb on so many levels but mainly...
1. You have no fukkin ideas what plot armor is. If you did, you wouldn't keep using it out of context.
2. BoMac was like the first person to acknowledge that it's not just him that deserves the credit.
So yeah... There you go again tryna discredit the win.
"They studied him for a good minute"
Hell maybe James and company should have been studying Crawford for a good minute. Maybe the result would be different.
Man... Listening to this Shane interview kinda tripped me out. I didn't realize Mayweather was that much younger than Oscar and him.
It makes for a great argument. If those dudes were all the same age, would Mayweather be what he is?
Bruh... He fought all then nikkas and was competitive in every fight.
He beat Ugas, Garcia, Biscuits, and Berto.
But he lost to Spence, Crawford, Thurman, and Brook.
But he's the only one that's fought them all.
I think Spence is number 2 but nikkas gotta stay putting more respect on Porter's name.
I'm using it just fine buddy, Craw is invincible to some of you cats on some million lives/always full power bar shyt.
The rest of that stuff you typed is all blinded bullshyt/couldn't even see I was giving Bomac props on how they moved.
You and @NormanConnors can have it out, but I swear I've seen this opinion stated one too many times and it bothers me. I know he got roughed up more than usual, but how many and what rds did Maidana actually win for this to be parroted so much? I haven't re-watched that fight in a while but I watched it like 3 or 4 times closer to when it happened, and I don't see how non Floyd haters could come away with this thought. It was a boxing match, not WWE aftertall.Contextually you are not. I think Crawford is great but never did I once mention that he was unbeatable. If you can find anywhere that in mentioned that he couldn't be beat, I'll be out gracefully.
How were you giving the man props? You conveniently used the word "tent". At its core, this is a hip hop site and everybody who's been around the last 8 years knows what's implied when that word is used. Don't be full of shyt like R=Weirdo. You the homie.
Lastly... The same "plot armor" we supposedly have for Crawford has been used for Mayweather since forever. How can you laugh at me saying that Porter could be the second best in his era and try to clown me for my comment about the Shane interview, when Mayweather quite possibly got gifts against Castillo and Maidana?
Ugas should have got the nod against Porter, legit robbery