Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,603
Daps
67,685
BC2 was better than BF3 because the maps were bigger. You felt like it was an actual war, vehicles made more of an impact as well.

BF3 introduced a more run and gun style, mainly because it was a console port


64 players on PC BF3 is a joke :russ: on them small as maps :pacspit:
definitely needed a couple huge maps for those 64 player servers. For most maps 64 players is entirely too much on PC. Nothin is fun about getting shot from every single possible angle. 35-40 players though is :blessed: status

You run and gun on PC and you're gonna get destroyed every game. PC feels like a real war, especially when you have surround sound speakers like :ahh:
 

Rain

đź‘€
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,659
Reputation
5,143
Daps
98,173
Cotdamn I forgot how much harder DICE made shooting in 3. I just played a little bit of BC2 using AN-92 (GOAT gun) with 4x scope.

...My shyt is all over the place trying that setup on BF3 :heh:
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,911
Reputation
4,022
Daps
69,916
:snoop: they released a dozen battlefield games between battlefield 2 and 3

when will people realize that the title of the battlefield games is irrelevant, the playstyle is the same in every single one of them regardless of title name

This isnt true. Bad company games are irrelevant as far as PC goes. They were made for console play, and i really enjoyed BC2. They were just ported over to PCs. Battlefield is a PC title. Between BF2 and BF3 you probaly just had BF 2142 and thats it. BF2 is one of the most successful multiplayer combat games on PC because of the community and mods. BF3 could have been too but they need to take the shackles off the game. Bad Company, BF2, and BF 3 dont play alike at all. They arent like COD.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,733
Reputation
6,607
Daps
108,308
Reppin
Bay Area
This isnt true. Bad company games are irrelevant as far as PC goes. They were made for console play, and i really enjoyed BC2. They were just ported over to PCs. Battlefield is a PC title. Between BF2 and BF3 you probaly just had BF 2142 and thats it. BF2 is one of the most successful multiplayer combat games on PC because of the community and mods. BF3 could have been too but they need to take the shackles off the game. Bad Company, BF2, and BF 3 dont play alike at all. They arent like COD.

:upsetfavre::sitdown:

Your whole post is fukking backwards

Between BF2 and BF3 you had

Battlefield 2142 (the worst battlefield to ever come out, the hit scans in this game was the worst out of any fps in history probably)
Battlefield 1943
Bad Company 1
Bad Company 2


I didnt count battlefield heroes, which was still an official release by EA

im not even going to get into the whole bad company for consoles bs. Battlefield is no longer a "PC franchise" since Battlefield 3 it was MADE ON consoles FOR consoles and PORTED to PC. This is not debatable. This is fact.



Before we even continue this conversation ima need a link to your battlelog

because if it looks anything like http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/CRAKFACE/stats/218714980/ps3/ @Crakface then I dont want to even have this conversation with you
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,911
Reputation
4,022
Daps
69,916
:upsetfavre::sitdown:

Your whole post is fukking backwards

Between BF2 and BF3 you had

Battlefield 2142 (the worst battlefield to ever come out, the hit scans in this game was the worst out of any fps in history probably)
Battlefield 1943
Bad Company 1
Bad Company 2


I didnt count battlefield heroes, which was still an official release by EA

Bruh you just said the same thing I did :why:

Battlefield 1943, and the Bad Company series are console games. Bad Company was ported over to PCs and still wasnt reaching the level of users BF 2 had before BF 3 came out.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,733
Reputation
6,607
Daps
108,308
Reppin
Bay Area
Bruh you just said the same thing I did :why:

Battlefield 1943, and the Bad Company series are console games. Bad Company was ported over to PCs and still wasnt reaching the level of users BF 2 had before BF 3 came out.

:snoop: we didnot say the same thing, you just said Battlefield is a PC franchise, and im telling you it no longer is
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,911
Reputation
4,022
Daps
69,916
:snoop: we didnot say the same thing, you just said Battlefield is a PC franchise, and im telling you it no longer is

I'm agreeing with you then based on this post. EA is leading the b*stardization of the franchise from PC to console based.
 

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
86,094
Reputation
4,806
Daps
189,608
I'm not sure what it was about BC2. But it's just more fun than BF3. Either way you're right, they're both my most played FPS this gen. :yeshrug:

fukk it I almost feel like playing Arica Harbor & White Pass right now :sadcam:

It was suited more for consoles while BF3 is a PC title. The maps were perfect size and the Vietnam DLC was :lawd: BF3 is great but some of the maps and mechanics are :flabbyhov:

what order ? Battlefield 2 -> Bad Company 1 -> Bad Company 2 -> Battlefield 3

in what way would releasing bad company 3 then battlefield 4 be in order ?

My problem is that theres not enough differences between bad company series and regular battlefield series to warrant 2 separate games..

they should stick to battlefield 4 and then release a vietnam or WW2 or some older war type shyt expansion like they did with bad company 2. Bad Company 2 vietnam was :whew: status except some of those maps :scusthov:

I truly think the bad company series should be a console series while the normal BF should stay on PC.
 

KevCo

Bond's gun spoke once....
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,199
Reputation
-9
Daps
15,003
Reppin
The Weird Side
We need bad company 3 more. Why is ea trying to cod this shyt up and ruin the franchise. Cod has been shyt for damn near 3 years already

EA is so damn stupid sometimes. Keep it in order. Drop bad company 3 then battlefield 4, bc4....

:snoop:

its a money business, your feelings on cod being trash are irrelevant. its about sales, and cod is a god damn money maker....
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,911
Reputation
4,022
Daps
69,916
Before we even continue this conversation ima need a link to your battlelog

because if it looks anything like Progression - CRAKFACE - Battlelog / Battlefield 3 @Crakface then I dont want to even have this conversation with you

SMH at this edit. Im verified in these battlefield streets. Since BF 2 nikka. I havent even played recently because EA fukked up the last patch and i get kicked every 5 minutes for connection issues. Bullshyt. Post your shyt nikka. :birdman: Progression - YoAyDri - Battlelog / Battlefield 3
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lord Beasley

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
42,218
Reputation
2,394
Daps
79,425
Reppin
469 x 972 x 702
they need to abandon ship on BF and come original. i played bf2 more than any other bf game. hell i even played 2142 more than BF3. the series is getting played out for real......
 

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,122
Reputation
2,625
Daps
59,900
its a money business, your feelings on cod being trash are irrelevant. its about sales, and cod is a god damn money maker....
money is irrelevant to us as the consumers, its about quality at the end of the day.

COD is ass, its a war game that doesn't even feel like a damn war game. Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3 feels like most would feel in a real firefight.

You know ducking for cover, TEAMWORK, classes like medics that are vital and need to be REPLENISHED and protected by the team so they can keep that steady flow of med packs coming. EVERY class has a purpose instead of everyone popping out of the bushes playing fukking Rambo.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcZ3wXF3r14"]Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob - YouTube[/ame]
 
Top