Essential The Official ADOS Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Stone Cold
- Start date
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
https://nypost.com/2020/03/14/bernie-bros-warn-of-massive-exodus-if-democrats-nominate-joe-biden/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site buttons&utm_campaign=site buttons
It's the Post, so take it with a grain of salt.
The audacity of the hypocrisy is palpable.
Captain Crunch
Veteran
This Call to Action is ripped from online
Captain Crunch
Veteran
voltronblack
Superstar
saturn7
Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
Damn that sucks. Unanimous too? Even the "Liberal" Justice's turned out to be worthless in our time of need.
voltronblack
Superstar
It shyt like that make go
when I see black coli posters say that voting does not matter in the grand scheme of things god damn total fukking unless son of bytches the alot of them are what the point of caring if a dem or rep get to pick who sit on the supreme if there all going to agree on 
are rights.
saturn7
Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
"but but the Supreme Court"
Liberal Justice Sides with Conservatives and States’ Rights in Criminal Justice Case
Barack Obama‘s handpicked replacement for legendary liberal Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has once again sided with the conservative majority on a hot-button criminal justice issue.
In a 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Elena Kagan, an extremely limited insanity defense in the State of Kansas was deemed to be constitutionally sufficient under the Due Process Clause–which will now result in the petitioner being executed by the state. The ruling is being viewed as a decided setback for criminal justice reform advocates and the rights of criminal defendants.
“Elena Kagan – whose appointment, you may recall, was opposed by many on the left because she was far more conservative than John Paul Stevens [and] had no judicial record – joins (again) with the Court’s right-wing, upholding Kansas’s narrow insanity defense,” commented attorney and The Intercept editor Glenn Greenwald.
Stylized as Kahler v. Kansas, the case concerns a man, James Kahler, who shot and killed four of his family members. Kahler raised the state’s limited insanity defense at trial and during the sentencing phase–while also filing separate pre-trial litigation arguing that Kansas had effectively abolished the insanity defense entirely. His arguments before the Supreme Court were an agglomeration of his various pre-trial, trial and post-trial defenses and theories.
Kagan and the conservatives rejected Kahler’s claim that Kansas had abolished the insanity defense–by eliding it entirely. Instead, the high court ignored that claim and found Kansas’s limited defense was constitutionally firm–essentially because of states’ rights.
continued......
Liberal Justice Sides with Conservatives and States’ Rights in Criminal Justice Case
thanks again Obama
Liberal Justice Sides with Conservatives and States’ Rights in Criminal Justice Case
Barack Obama‘s handpicked replacement for legendary liberal Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has once again sided with the conservative majority on a hot-button criminal justice issue.
In a 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Elena Kagan, an extremely limited insanity defense in the State of Kansas was deemed to be constitutionally sufficient under the Due Process Clause–which will now result in the petitioner being executed by the state. The ruling is being viewed as a decided setback for criminal justice reform advocates and the rights of criminal defendants.
“Elena Kagan – whose appointment, you may recall, was opposed by many on the left because she was far more conservative than John Paul Stevens [and] had no judicial record – joins (again) with the Court’s right-wing, upholding Kansas’s narrow insanity defense,” commented attorney and The Intercept editor Glenn Greenwald.
Stylized as Kahler v. Kansas, the case concerns a man, James Kahler, who shot and killed four of his family members. Kahler raised the state’s limited insanity defense at trial and during the sentencing phase–while also filing separate pre-trial litigation arguing that Kansas had effectively abolished the insanity defense entirely. His arguments before the Supreme Court were an agglomeration of his various pre-trial, trial and post-trial defenses and theories.
Kagan and the conservatives rejected Kahler’s claim that Kansas had abolished the insanity defense–by eliding it entirely. Instead, the high court ignored that claim and found Kansas’s limited defense was constitutionally firm–essentially because of states’ rights.
continued......
Liberal Justice Sides with Conservatives and States’ Rights in Criminal Justice Case
thanks again Obama
Captain Crunch
Veteran
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Basically Ginsburg gave him an opening to find racial discrimination in discovery. But he has to find the evidence to prove it. Also, what she says is that the Congress needs to amend 1866 to allow what he's trying to sue for. Which is a "motivating factor" as opposed to "the defining concrete reason". A heavy burden indeed.
Captain Crunch
Veteran
We got anybody out in the Cleveland area? This man is running for Congress out there
voltronblack
Superstar
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Captain Crunch
Veteran
Dems proposed reparations for gay couples; Hispanics in ICE center, and Native Americans.
Captain Crunch
Veteran
https://ioneblackamericaweb.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/cbc-coronavirus-response-priorities.pdf
The link above is for the CBC's full proposal for Corona relief. We should all read it, it's 11 pages.
The link above is for the CBC's full proposal for Corona relief. We should all read it, it's 11 pages.