Essential The Official ADOS Discussion Thread

[Roland Coltrane]

The article is saying EXACTLY what I've been repeating on this forum FOR MONTHS.

Radical social programs that distribute wealth in this country like Universal Health Care and the like would disproportionally benefit black people and cannot be put on the back burner because they aren't for blacks and blacks only. This is why we need to be supporting candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. But you have people on this forum contemplating not voting for them because they don't have specific programs for black people and black people only. This is a dumb strategy when the social programs they advocate for, which are basically a turn to socialism from capitalism, is exactly what we need and would disproportionally help us the most. And as the article states, these sorts of programs would open the door and make the case for reparations easier.

But cats would rather listen to Tariq Nasheed and them and disown the Democratic Party for emotional reasons and heed to misinformation, thus giving up our political capital and let the Republicans further fukk the country and shyt on our voting rights so that, once they came along, we couldn't put the perfect candidate in office even if we wanted to.

BE STRATEGIC

I thought you were #TeamKamala

you've spent months stumping for her like nobody's business and now you've switched your tune. Why?

Did you get exposed too frequently to the point where that course of action was no longer tenable and you've diverted your focus to Sanders and Warren?

irregardless of anything #tangibles still matter.
Every other group gets their needs addressed and when it's done they are mentioned explicitly by name. The author of that article intimated herself that having the same complexion isn't enough for Black people anymore and she's right. Booker and Harris employ the same vague, lukewarm rhetoric for a reason, but they get a fire in their belly when speaking about other minority populations

we're still at the bottom despite having been here centuries and other groups come here and lap us, largely due to the fact they are benefitting from the battles we fought. Who is going to fight for us and not be scared to say so?

nikkas are done with that "rising tide lifts all boats" shyt because if our boat was shytty to begin with and in danger of capsizing then a rising tide will do what it will always do-still leave us in a shytty precarious situation

 

[Roland Coltrane]

It doesn't matter that John Lewis isn't a co-sponsor. Co-Sponsors doesn't matter. For example Maxine Waters wasn't a co-sponsor for the Affordable Care Act either, but she voted for it when it counts.

There were only 40 or so democratic co-sponsors for ACA. When it came down to vote for it 219 of democratic representatives voted yes. There are currently 38 co-sponsors for HR-40. That is more than enough.

bytching about who co-sponsors a bill is just showing ignorance to how bills are written and passed in congress.

EDIT: John Lewis is listed as a co-sponsor on the bill for the 2018 version: All Info - H.R.40 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act

Like I said, co-sponsorship doesn't matter. He will be a Yes vote when it counts.

good god you're an insufferable dikkhead


Edit-and now you're on Twitter arguing in that thread

I'm convinced you're being paid or have a severe form of mental illness

 

[dj-method-x]

I thought you were #TeamKamala

you've spent months stumping for her like nobody's business and now you've switched your tune. Why?

Did you get exposed too frequently to the point where that course of action was no longer tenable and you've diverted your focus to Sanders and Warren?

irregardless of anything #tangibles still matter.
Every other group gets their needs addressed and when it's done they are mentioned explicitly by name. The author of that article intimated herself that having the same complexion isn't enough for Black people anymore and she's right. Booker and Harris employ the same vague, lukewarm rhetoric for a reason, but they get a fire in their belly when speaking about other minority populations

we're still at the bottom despite having been here centuries and other groups come here and lap us, largely due to the fact they are benefitting from the battles we fought. Who is going to fight for us and not be scared to say so?

nikkas are done with that "rising tide lifts all boats" shyt because if our boat was shytty to begin with and in danger of capsizing then a rising tide will do what it will always do-still leave us in a shytty precarious situation

I never stumped for Kamala. I defended her against baseless and silly claims. You will never find a post of mine that says Kamala is my first choice for president.

You don't understand how these policies they are talking about DISPROPORTIONATELY HELP US THE MOST. To not support these programs for silly shyt like "not mentioning us by name" is completely short-sighted. The alternative to supporting candidates that advocate for programs that disproportionately affect us the most, is having people in power that advocate for programs that don't benefit us at all, who then also advocate for policies that suppress our vote, thus rendering us completely powerless politically. Your strategy is literally akin to throwing the baby out with the bath water.

 

[dj-method-x]

good god you're an insufferable dikkhead


Edit-and now you're on Twitter arguing in that thread

I'm convinced you're being paid or have a severe form of mental illness

He co-sponsored it in 2018, he likely will be added to the list of co-sponsors this year. The bill was literally reintroduced a couple of weeks ago. Like I said before. Co-sponsorships DO NOT MATTER. They are simply symbolic in nature. The only thing that matters are the Yes votes when it comes time to vote for it. Again, there were only 40 co-sponsors for the ACA. 219 people ended up voting for it when it counted. There are 38 co-sponsors for HR-40 now. He will undoubtedly be a yes vote.

bytching about this just shows you've never followed the process before and don't know wtf you're talking about.

 

[Roland Coltrane]

He co-sponsored it in 2018, he likely will be added to the list of co-sponsors this year. The bill was literally reintroduced a couple of weeks ago. Like I said before. Co-sponsorships DO NOT MATTER. They are simply symbolic in nature. The only thing that matters are the Yes votes when it comes time to vote for it. Again, there were only 40 co-sponsors for the ACA. 219 people ended up voting for it when it counted. There are 38 co-sponsors for HR-40 now. He will undoubtedly be a yes vote.

bytching about this just shows you've never followed the process before and don't know wtf you're talking about.

MOTHERfukk YOU AND YOUR JUELZING, CLOWN

Jesus Christ you can't even make this shyt up. Just fukking kill yourself already you'd be doing the world a favor

@Indiglow Meta (R$G) @Nicole0416 @xoxodede you see this shyt

Unfukking believable

HOW CAN SOMEBODY BE SO CONFIDENTLY LOUD AND WRONG ALL OF THE fukkING TIME

you're out here getting exposed as a bald faced liar on a near daily basis at this point

Again breh, when does it end

Don't you get tired of this


are you purposely this inept while having a preternatural ability to make others detest you?

I think you're a troll alright, a troll for the Right

because there's nobody who advocates for candidates, causes, and agendas as much as you do can lack self awareness to that degree.

this level of incompetence is so off the charts it can't be anything but intentional


You really should be banned at this point

 

[dj-method-x]

MOTHERfukk YOU AND YOUR JUELZING, CLOWN

Jesus Christ you can't even make this shyt up. Just fukking kill yourself already you'd be doing the world a favor

@Indiglow Meta (R$G) @Nicole0416 @xoxodede you see this shyt

Unfukking believable

HOW CAN SOMEBODY BE SO CONFIDENTLY LOUD AND

WRONG ALL OF THE fukkING TIME

you're out here getting exposed as a bald faced liar on a near daily basis at this point

Again breh, when does it end

Don't you get tired of this


are you purposely this inept while having a preternatural ability to make others detest you?

I think you're a troll alright, a troll for the Right

because there's nobody who advocates for candidates, causes, and agendas as much as you do can lack self awareness to that degree.

this level of incompetence is so off the charts it can't be anything but intentional


You really should be banned at this point

Where's the lie in what I said? I gave you facts and history and you just typed a whole bunch of nothing and emotional womanly bullshyt.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

You really should be banned at this point

They're too busy banning posters who post dead cacs or defend their girlfriends/wives . They want trolls, agents and cac sympathizers here. Anybody that is not anti-white gets condoned.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Where's the lie in what I said? I gave you facts and history and you just typed a whole bunch of nothing and emotional womanly bullshyt.

You typed a lot of words and still didn't say shyt.

 

[Roland Coltrane]

Where's the lie in what I said? I gave you facts and history and you just typed a whole bunch of nothing and emotional womanly bullshyt.

nikka...

you said he signed it did you not?

HE DIDN'T SIGN IT


THAT'S A fukkING LIE MORON

and you went and told the same lie on Twitter


How the fukk you got the gall to ask "where did I lie" when you JUST lied




Calling people emotional when you got the nerve to cartwheel into this post cursing at people

 

[dj-method-x]

I hear whispers from the lonely graveyard of the ignored begging for my attention.

*spits and continues sipping red wine*

 

[DEAD7]

 

[dj-method-x]

nikka...

you said he signed it did you not?

HE DIDN'T SIGN IT


THAT'S A fukkING LIE MORON

and you went and told the same lie on Twitter


How the fukk you got the gall to ask "where did I lie" when you JUST lied




Calling people emotional when you got the nerve to cartwheel into this post cursing at people

You dumb fukk. I said he signed the 2018 bill, and gave your dumbass a link to it

READ

It doesn't matter that John Lewis isn't a co-sponsor. Co-Sponsors doesn't matter. For example Maxine Waters wasn't a co-sponsor for the Affordable Care Act either, but she voted for it when it counts.

There were only 40 or so democratic co-sponsors for ACA. When it came down to vote for it 219 of democratic representatives voted yes. There are currently 38 co-sponsors for HR-40. That is more than enough.

bytching about who co-sponsors a bill is just showing ignorance to how bills are written and passed in congress.

EDIT: John Lewis is listed as a co-sponsor on the bill for the 2018 version: All Info - H.R.40 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act

Like I said, co-sponsorship doesn't matter. He will be a Yes vote when it counts.

 

[Roland Coltrane]

You dumb fukk. I said he signed the 2018 bill, and gave your dumbass a link to it

READ

my apologies for mixing up which platform you lied on

You wrote on Yvette's timeline "he signed it"

But for whatever reason that tweet is gone


WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT TWEET BREH

I see the first one but not the second

either way you're a lying piece of shyt

 

[loyola llothta]

 

[dj-method-x]

my apologies for mixing up which platform you lied on

You wrote on Yvette's timeline "he signed it"

But for whatever reason that tweet is gone


WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT TWEET BREH

I see the first one but not the second

either way you're a lying piece of shyt

I only tweeted Yvette once fukk boy.