Chrishaune
Veteran
Because they’re not good breh. They don’t suck but they ain’t good
better than Ole Miss.
Because they’re not good breh. They don’t suck but they ain’t good
Being in the top five verses top 12 is not a minuscule difference, the biggest thing, is some of our 3-4 stars have bloomed into studs, but we have whiffed on 4 stars, that hurts us more than a team whiffing on a 3-4 star but you have 2, 5 stars to replace them the following season. It’s one thing to have a hutch and jobo but we currently don’t have that to replace them now, and have to hope someone matures into that by next year, vs having higher caliber players that you’d sooner know they will bloomThat “ranking” difference is miniscule when you’re talking about 3 players probably concentrated between 2 or 3 position groups. Michigan and osu havent had a talent gap since like 2016
There’s no way you said that with a straight face, they are historically a middling team, due to money, caliber of athlete, and coachingMississippi State is pretty good. I don't know why they lay down against bama and LSU though. Maybe Leach can change that at least one time.
What’s there to be jealous of, and y’all have pack mentality, imagine me being happy for Purdue, fukk this conference, it’s Michigan and no one else, but there are inherent bias that you all get periodBig 10 fans are so jealous of the SEC
.Maybe Sean P high on some Percocet
Mississippi State immediately got ranked after beating their first team with a winning record all season. They're 1-4 this year against teams with winning records, including a loss to 7-5 Kentucky, and still get ranked in the top-25.
The team they beat (and replaced in the standings) was Ole Miss, who themselves was 2-4 against teams with winning records, the only victories being against Troy and Kentucky and one of their losses to 6-6 Arkansas.
LSU lost by 15 to fukking Texas A&M, who was 4-7 until that game with only two Power 5 wins and a loss to Appalachian State, and yet LSU only dropped to #11 in the standings. They've only beat 1 ranked team all season (and only 1 other win against a Power 5 squad with a winning record), yet they're the top-ranked three-loss team in the country. Utah, Oregon, and UCLA all have more ranked wins than LSU has, yet are still behind them.
UCLA has wins against #9 Washington and #12 Utah, and two of its losses are against #4 USC and #15 Oregon, yet it's ranked 6 spots behind LSU and barely in front of 8-4 Notre Dame.
It's like the voters have an SEC quota of teams they have to keep ranked and just automatically insert an SEC team into the standings no matter how pathetic their actual accolades are.
better than Ole Miss.
True they did beat them but beating Ole Miss shouldn’t be their super bowlbetter than Ole Miss.
Its so bad this year. Alabama beat nobody but those same mediocre teams but somehow they’re “pretty good” wins, and bama is trying to make a case for the playoffs.But they're both mediocre. Outside of the game they played each other, Ole Miss and Miss State combined beat zero ranked teams all year. Combined they only beat two winning teams all year: Troy and Kentucky. Ole Miss and Miss State combined didn't win a single road game against a winning team and combined only won four road games total.
And you know what Miss State's contribution to that is? Again, outside of the game where they played each other, Mississippi State beat ZERO ranked teams, ZERO teams with winning records, and had only won ONE road game all year.
How fukking incredible is it that a team who made it to the final weekend of the season without beating a single team with a winning record and only winning 1 road game is now ranked in the top-25?