The newest @matt504 troll

[Gravity]

Except it is about voluntary sterilization, see page 2 or 19.

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/18136097/

Not with you it isn't.

if we can somehow breed the darker members of the Black race out of the equation by only procreating with non Black lighter skinned people, we might be able to overcome visually looking black in about 50-60 years if done correctly.

Israel already gave us the outline with the forced sterilization of ethiopeans, if darker african americans are forced to be sterilized in America, we could simultaneously cut down on abortions, while gradually assimilating into the dominant society.

This is a post that you yourself re-posted in this thread. Did you forget?

 

[iBrowse]

@Matt504 has been embarassing since 2013. It's a wonder some of you are just now catching on

"but I've been tryna tell yall " ass nikka

Since 2013 I've been calling you out for being a lying, fraud ass dude. The overwhelming majority of the board seems to agree with me as there's a thread like this popping up ever couple of weeks. Only so long fake ass nikkas can pretend

What have I lied about tho, you nikkas love making accusations and when it's time to back it up with facts you can't. You basically a bytch nikka with hate in your blood, you can verify this by looking in the mirror and being honest with yourself.

You're a peasant both on and offline, you can't compare to me on or offline, I could take your bytch online and give her back offline.

My bytch doesn't talk to 30 year old virgins.

I'm not 30 and even if I was 40 I could take your bytch.

Some real playa shyt right there

 

[Matt504]

Ok a few things

Criminal actually has a defined meaning. You keep saying "is criminal" which I asked about governing bodies. If it is a crime, what is the punishment? I need you to think on a deeper level about what legislature you would be championing in your MattTopia

So, let me get this straight:

• 1 child no opt in = still get benefits.
• 2 children no opt in = no more benefits unless you get sterilized.
• All non citizens = no government assistance whatsoever

Okay I can work with this, let me play DA for a bit
In your mind bringing a child into the world that you cannot afford to take care of is "criminal" but you would be willing the help them out via government assistance

However, in your MattTopia, said couple brings a second child into the world and not only do they not get extra assistance, they no longer receive what they were getting for the first child. . Now this is interesting, because what you feel so strongly (raising children in poverty), your legislation would basically guarantee that both (and all other children born thereafter) would be raised in poverty

Unless of course they agree to have a physically invasive life-altering surgery...


Now this is why i said to step out of your bubble. Because anyone who knows human nature knows exactly how this will end.

I believe that bringing children into the world you cannot afford is criminal, I believe it's a crime, in my hypothetical I'm not suggesting these people be punished, my focus is on how can we solve the problem, I may address punishments in a later iteration of my hypothesis.

1 child no opt in = still get benefits
2 children no opt in = still get benefits but no additional benefits for the second child.
all non citizens, people here illegally would not be eligible for benefits, if they become citizens, they'd be eligble for benefits.

It's my opinion that it's a crime to birth children you cannot afford to take care of, and yes, I would be willing to help the parents who are in poverty and only have one child with the hopes of helping them escape that poverty by supplementing whatever income they have with government benefits and programs that can assist with helping the person further their education.

If this person doesn't opt in and are already getting government benefits for one child they can't afford without those benefits, it's irresponsible of the governement to award them additional benefits if they then have another child they can't afford but they'd still have a chance to receive benefits for the second child if they were to voluntarily opt in to have a reversible procedure, guaranteeing there'd be no possibility of a third child until that procedure is reversed.

Abortions are also life altering procedures and on average, there are nearly 1,000,000 (one million) abortion procedures annually, and all the risks and complications that go along with them, preventing the pregnancy in the first place also prevents the abortion.

 

[Matt504]

Not with you it isn't.
This is a post that you yourself re-posted in this thread. Did you forget?

You should read the thread it came from for context.

 

[Gold]

I believe that bringing children into the world you cannot afford is criminal, I believe it's a crime, in my hypothetical I'm not suggesting these people be punished, my focus is on how can we solve the problem, I may address punishments in a later iteration of my hypothesis.

1 child no opt in = still get benefits
2 children no opt in = still get benefits but no additional benefits for the second child.
all non citizens, people here illegally would not be eligible for benefits, if they become citizens, they'd be eligble for benefits.

It's my opinion that it's a crime to birth children you cannot afford to take care of, and yes, I would be willing to help the parents who are in poverty and only have one child with the hopes of helping them escape that poverty by supplementing whatever income they have with government benefits and programs that can assist with helping the person further their education.

If this person doesn't opt in and are already getting government benefits for one child they can't afford without those benefits, it's irresponsible of the governement to award them additional benefits if they then have another child they can't afford but they'd still have a chance to receive benefits for the second child if they were to voluntarily opt in to have a reversible procedure, guaranteeing there'd be no possibility of a third child until that procedure is reversed.

Abortions are also life altering procedures and on average, there are nearly 1,000,000 (one million) abortion procedures annually, and all the risks and complications that go along with them, preventing the pregnancy in the first place also prevents the abortion.

Still in DA:

What about the people who see the light a bit later in life? How about after 4 children they decide to have the procedure, will the funding still be available for them?

 

[Matt504]

Still in DA:

What about the people who see the light a bit later in life? How about after 4 children they decide to have the procedure, will the funding still be available for them?

That's a fair questions and I don't how I'd handle that scenario. Based on the parameters of my hypothetical, how would you propose this case be handled?

 

[Tropical Fantasy]

He's the type of nikka to be ok with living in a matriarchal society

 

[Zero]

Remember when you nikkas used to worship that CAC when he was on his Coli-militant and #inherently troll job? Y'all nikkas loved him then.
I don't know no black man named Matt.

Spoiler

But if we gon keep it all the way 100 :iseeu:

I know we all come from all walks of life....but every "Matt" I ever knew in my lifetime has been white.

 

[resurrection]

I'm not reading the whole thread, so I don't have a lot of context except the original post.

But I do think the entire world (not just one race or whatever) needs to consider how we are controlling the overall human population. The human population as a whole is skyrocketing and the planet will not be able to sustain it forever. I'm talking macro-level here though, not micro-level like what the OP is talking about with bringing kids into poverty-stricken families and narrowing it to one race or whatever.

 

[Gravity]

You should read the thread it came from for context.

If you thought framing the post in a particular context was important then you should've done that upon re-posting it. I did skim thru the thread you originally made the post but the post still speaks for itself. I quoted it to show that you don't just advocate for voluntary sterilization, you provided proof yourself that you're also an advocate for forced sterilization........in a certain context.

 

[Zero]

I been knew this nikka was retarded. He has "Black excellence" in his avi but everytime I see this nikka post he's trying his best to make blacks look like shyt

It's lowkey the perfect troll

 

[Zero]

I literally had this discussion earlier with my girlfriend and the answer is yes.

"but but but you wouldn't be here"


so what? my parents would have had less strain in their lives not raising two children in poverty.

I'm really not sure why this thread continued for 3 more pages after this post.

 

[KOOL-AID]

You're a peasant both on and offline, you can't compare to me on or offline, I could take your bytch online and give her back offline.

I thot u advocated men not using women for selfish personal gains

 

[Jazzy B.]

Those days when he was as uncompromising as @ridedolo on Black Issues


How things change

 

[YeLovesBoston]

Make poor people get sterilized

Thats not realistic because thats unconstitutional. In fact its evil.