The New Zimbabwe for Sale: Foreigners Will Be Allowed To Have 100% Ownership of Mining Operations

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,063
Reputation
6,991
Daps
80,025
Reppin
BaBylon
Sounds like :duck: as in whoever will get the mine strong-armed it from Zimbabwe and told the PM told make a statement that their selling 100% of it to any foreigners interested. :smh:

Who gives over 100% of their resources to auxiliary nations? :mjlol:
nah this it that. just three authoritarian morons (President Emmerson Mnangagwa, Mthuli Ncube, and Vice President Constantino Chiwenga)

:francis:
In Davos last week, Ncube defended the Chiwenga’s Internet disconnection as just “a temporary and tactical strategy to try to manage the situation… managing insurrection, and managing information and dissemination.” Speaking to CNN, he bizarrely blamed last week’s protests on a “pre-planned” conspiracy and not his petrol price hike: “these are the facts.” Anger at the petrol price was “added on.” And he defended army intervention: “What you saw in the streets is actually a sign that the government is open. Democratic spaces are open.”

Two leading opposition politicians were scathing. Welshman Ncube (no relation) called him a “political moron” for these remarks, and former MDC finance minister Tendai Biti (from 2009-13) labels Ncube a “fraud.” As if to prove it, in another interview Ncube said of his Davos trip, “Things are going well. The theme is Globalisation 4.0. It resonates with what Zimbabwe’s trying to do in terms of global financial re-engagement, raising capital, pushing our mantra that Zimbabwe’s open for business. It really resonates. Zimbabwe is the best buy in Africa.”

Under Ncube, much more explicitly neoliberal, anti-poor fiscal and monetary policies prevail, with no end in sight. The new regime has been unable to make structural changes to an impoverished economy dependent upon primary-resource exports in a time of still-low world commodity prices. Since last September, when Ncube was appointed, budget cutbacks and desperation currency manipulation have logically followed.


Ncube’s vain arrears ambitions: pay, won’t pay or can’t pay – and can’t get new loans

Zimbabwe’s notorious shortage of hard currency was the proximate cause of the fuel price hike, followed by rapid price increases in anything requiring transport, including the staple maize. In turn, this squeeze reflects the priorities of a new finance minister, the academic economist Ncube, who is considered the most neoliberal in modern Zimbabwe’s history. Exhibiting a sometimes startling self-confidence, and entirely comfortable within the circuits of world elites, Ncube is smooth and at first blush, persuasive.

But his three most spectacular prior mistakes were, first, founding and chairing the Harare Barbican Bank, which launched in mid-2003 but then “failed to meet obligations” to the country’s clearance system within seven months, leading to expulsion. Two months later it was declared insolvent, as its regulator at the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe explained, due to “serious liquidity problems as a result of imprudent banking behaviour… [including] questionable cross-border foreign exchange activities which are yet to be cleared to the satisfaction of all parties.”

A second mistake was serving well into 2018 as a top official at corruption-riddled financier Quantum Global, which ripped off Angola’s citizenry during his tenure there.

Third, as chief economist at the (Western-dominated) African Development Bank (AfDB) in 2011 at the height of “Africa Rising” hype, he declared the existence of a new “African middle class” of more than 330 million people: “Hey you know what, the world please wake up, this is a phenomenon in Africa that we’ve not spent a lot of time thinking about.” Oddly, Ncube included in the “middle class” category people who barely survive on US$2-4/day, a group of more than 200 million.
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,666
Reputation
7,248
Daps
129,328
Hope they some how turn It around
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
33,994
Reputation
2,108
Daps
166,067
I bet they won’t let foreign blacks invest in their mines. :mjpls: NOT ALL (just so I’m clear), but a lot of African people are a joke. They still want to be colonized, preferring to be babied under the boot of non-blacks than assume the responsibility of building up their nations. Too many Africans lack the spirit of ADOS. At some point, black ADOS are going to have to intervene and assist the Africans like Malema and others who are not just fighting off cacs, Asians, Arabs and Indians, but are in a struggle against the colonized mindset of their own black countrymen. :francis:
 
Last edited:

Afrodroid

God bless Black People!
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
13,654
Reputation
6,759
Daps
90,008
Reppin
Rio De Janeiro, BR
Oh .. they bold.








I’m very African, born in Bindura, my ancestors first set foot in Africa in 1668, & we’ve been here ever since (that was more than 100 years before USA was a nation!!) We’re the white tribe of Africa, Afrikaners to be exact, we ain’t going nowhere, & we’re humans, with rights :crackass:

If this lice infested neanderthal don't get his filthy ass all the way the fukk out of the Motherland... :mjlol:






Still... Zimbabwe lost! :francis:
 

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,063
Reputation
6,991
Daps
80,025
Reppin
BaBylon
Zimbabwean Communists Say Handing Over Mineral Resources to Foreign Firms is Treason

03 Apr 2019




Photo: Zimbabwe Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube

Zimbabwe’s new “open for business” posture apparently means, “Come and take all of our resources.”

“Ownership of mineral resources is the birthright of Zimbabweans.”

The ZANU(PF)-led government of Zimbabwe recently announced that the indigenization rule, which prohibits foreign mining companies from owning 50% or more of the shares, would be scrapped to allow 100% private ownership of platinum mines. The decision was soon extended to diamond mines, too.

The decision of the ZANU(PF)-led government of Zimbabwe to change the rules in order to allow 100% private ownership of platinum mines has been harshly criticized by the Zimbabwe Communist Party (ZCP), which has termed the decision as “treason.”

The Economic Structural Adjustment Program (ESAP), prescribed by the IMF, was adopted by Zimbabwe in 1991 under the leadership of the then finance minister, Bernard Chidzero. The program subjected the population to severe austerity for decades, while simultaneously providing an opening for private entities to gradually expand their ownership of the country’s natural resources.

“Ncube has offered to give our most precious resource, platinum, to foreign investors.”

“Now his clone, MthuliNcube [the current finance minister] has presented us with ESAP 2, and in the ultimate act of betrayal, has offered to give our most precious resource, platinum, to foreign investors ― with our diamonds (already in large part under the control of apartheid Israel) to follow,” the ZCP said in a statement.

While a formal announcement is yet to be made, the finance minister reportedly told Bloomberg, “We are removing that indigenization rule which is discouraging foreign direct investment. We say Zimbabwe is open for business; you can only be open if you allow ownership of 100%.”

The South Africa-based Impala Platinum was one of the mining giants whose share prices had dropped after the indigenization rule was introduced in 2011. The rule mandated foreign companies operating in sectors, including mining and banking, to transfer at least 51% of the shares to black Zimbabweans.

The company’s spokesperson said that they are waiting for a formal confirmation, and “remain encouraged by ongoing efforts by the government to open the economy to investment and growth.” Soon after, the minister of mines released a statement saying that this change in rule will also be extended to diamonds.

“We say Zimbabwe is open for business; you can only be open if you allow ownership of 100%.”

The difference between the development levels of the two countries in the neighborhood, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Botswana, ZCP said, is instructive of the consequences of having no restraints on foreign investment in mining.

“Botswana, on our western border, despite having a pro-Western foreign policy and a US base within its borders, has a 51% government share in its mines. Debswana, the main diamond mining company is 51% owned by the Botswana government and 49% owned by De Beers. In addition, the Botswana government bought a 20% interest in De Beers on the open market from its profits. At independence in 1964, there were only 3 kilometers of tarred road in Botswana; now due to investment in infrastructure, tarred roads cover most of the country.. [There is also improvement in] education and housing,” ZCP’s statement read.

On the other hand, the DRC “has a population living in abject poverty with little infrastructural development since the Belgians left in 1960. Only China, in the last few years, has started to build roads and schools in return for minerals. DRC, with its wars and its poverty is a living example of “Foreign Direct Investment” at work.”

“Botswana has a 51% government share in its mines.”

The ZCP clarified that what the party is calling for at this stage is not a full nationalization of the mining sector, but an arrangement where at least 50% of the shares are held by the state. However, it added that progress has to be made towards eventual nationalization.

“Ownership of mineral resources is the birthright of Zimbabweans. Management should be professional, and based on skill and experience. It may or may not be local in composition,” the ZCP noted.

The ZPC called on all progressive organizations and individuals, especially organized labor, to fight the “monstrous theft of national resources through the comprador bourgeoisie,” led by president Mnangagwa and finance minister Ncube
.

This article previously appeared in Peoples Dispatch .
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,556
Reppin
NULL
If Mugabe had allowed the state through joint venture of the mines and replicated the same with platinum this would not have eventually happened. Instead he used mineral resources to give the army and army connected people access to mine ownership with the Chinese. After he realized that none of that cash was flowing to the Treasury decided to consolidate and the Chinese lost out and as a result harm relations with them. The country has no leverage whatsoever to pressure investors and they could go back to the 51% and they wouldn't find any cash to acquire those shares because the finances are short to bits.
 

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,063
Reputation
6,991
Daps
80,025
Reppin
BaBylon
If Mugabe had allowed the state through joint venture of the mines and replicated the same with platinum this would not have eventually happened. Instead he used mineral resources to give the army and army connected people access to mine ownership with the Chinese. After he realized that none of that cash was flowing to the Treasury decided to consolidate and the Chinese lost out and as a result harm relations with them. The country has no leverage whatsoever to pressure investors and they could go back to the 51% and they wouldn't find any cash to acquire those shares because the finances are short to bits.
:mjpls:
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,779
Daps
112,544
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
:snoop:

This ain't it.

100% ownership. Well they need to pay up at least 33% - 40% in taxes.

If the mine generates $1 billion a year, well at least $330 - $400 million is going into the Zimbabwe treasury, and watched like a hawk to prevent fukkbois from robbing the people.
You can make arguments one way or another about aspects of Foreign Direct Investments. These private companies are still gone make a nice profit, but not for free.
 
Last edited:
Top