No they didn't.
Posters suggesting the C's are better without Kyrie/Hayward lose all credibility as basketball analysts. That's either dikkriding, trolling, or unbelievable stupidity.
My bad.I was off by a few percentage points...16-8 without Kyrie(I'm including the Charlotte game where he only played 2 minutes)....39-19 with Kyrie.....667% w/o.....672.%...Just about the same win percentage.Cleveland had a .610% with Lebron playing every single game.
And I never said Boston was better without Kyrie...Only that they had a better record than Cleveland this season.