Another aspect of the movement is that they tend to be wildly anti-environmentalism under the guise of being pro-environment. They'll give lots of lip service to environmental causes and claim that the threats facing the natural world are real. But then they'll argue that the solution to all environmental problems is better technology, that we need to stop enforcing environmental laws and give all the power over to corporations, and when corporations are fully free to do as they please, they're create technology so efficient that we won't have environmental worries anymore.
Anyone with the slightest experience in the real world knows exactly how that will go.
Elon Musk is the prime example of this. He made his fame claiming to be a huge pro-environment guy, someone who was going to "save the world" with electric cars. But in reality, he's out there regularly opposing public transportation projects, pushing bitcoin which is terrible for the environment, supporting right-wing politicians, claiming that environmentalists have "gone too far", is a huge booster of less government regulation and higher capitalist consumption, and claims we need to go to Mars to save humanity (which implies pretty much giving up on Earth).
All of his environmental "solutions" end up going to more capitalism and more technology. Which will have the exact opposite effect he claims.
That position in general is called "ecomodernism", and I think it's a pretty common policy point of techno-fascists. It's their way of claiming to still "follow the science" while not letting the science actually impact their lives or business moves at all.