Perot took a ton of votes from Bush , and Gary Johnson took some votes from Trump. Trump supporters went in on Libertarians in 2020.Show me the 3rd party candidate That’s taking votes away from the GOP
Perot took a ton of votes from Bush , and Gary Johnson took some votes from Trump. Trump supporters went in on Libertarians in 2020.Show me the 3rd party candidate That’s taking votes away from the GOP
Its not idelogies threatened. They don't have an ideology.Yall turn fascist real quick when your ideologies are threatened
Show me the 3rd party candidate That’s taking votes away from the GOP
What policies?Gop don't have people on the fence
Dems DO have people on the fence
Maybe fix the policies that got people on the fence
Your logic: leave the policies just don't let the on the fence voters have another option
Yall turn fascist real quick when your ideologies are threatened
So ancient historyPerot took a ton of votes from Bush , and Gary Johnson took some votes from Trump. Trump supporters went in on Libertarians in 2020.
So a future hypotheticalTrump, whether or not he gets the nomination.
Its beyond bizarreIts not idelogies threatened. They don't have an ideology.
Its the bizarre staining of political parties. They don't believe in anything but Donkeys or Elephants, and if you ask them why, they have to prevent the Donkey or Elephant from succeeding.
2020 is "ancient history"So ancient history
Perot and Bush is ancient history. I ignored the other one2020 is "ancient history"
Gop don't have people on the fence
Dems DO have people on the fence
Maybe fix the policies that got people on the fence
Your logic: leave the policies just don't let the on the fence voters have another option
Yall turn fascist real quick when your ideologies are threatened
Its not idelogies threatened. They don't have an ideology.
Its the bizarre staining of political parties. They don't believe in anything but Donkeys or Elephants, and if you ask them why, they have to prevent the Donkey or Elephant from succeeding.
100% agree with this. Just throwing a presidential campaign together means nothing if you don't have advocates in the legislature. Thats why it is more successful on a local level.Third Party candidates running for president are a big waste of time. It’s a big jerk off. If a Third party wants to be taken seriously, it has to build itself from the ground up. What’s the point of winning the presidency if your agenda is dead on arrival? The other two parties would form like Voltron to put an end to all of Cornell West policies just out of self preservation.
That's not what I said. A person like @CrimsonTider is closer to a low-information voter than he thinks and only votes based on Blue or Red. He doesn't have a real ideology for anything other than, "I won't vote Red."So there are no ideological differences between the parties? Is this your version of "both sides"?
Minimizing republican power seems like a real ideology to me? What other reasons are there to vote?100% agree with this. Just throwing a presidential campaign together means nothing if you don't have advocates in the legislature. Thats why it is more successful on a local level.
That's not what I said. A person like @CrimsonTider is closer to a low-information voter than he thinks and only votes based on Blue or Red. He doesn't have a real ideology for anything other than, "I won't vote Red."
There are a few differences between the parties, but a person like @CrimsonTider isn't voting based on those policy differences. He only backs the Blue.
Minimizing republican power seems like a real ideology to me? What other reasons are there to vote?
I’m not foolish enough to think capitalism will be abolished
They don't believe in anything but Donkeys or Elephants, and if you ask them why, they have to prevent the Donkey or Elephant from succeeding.