Why are you saying "no" and then going on to describe EXACTLY what I said???
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28d2c/28d2ccacf2c1d0f98c47decdb3051e8a2f5d88ba" alt="why :why: :why:"
Here:
That is literally, producers specifically targeting lesbians by marketing them as a sexual fantasy to straight men.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e88/79e88e94f7274aec41c266bc09b3b1fc20aa268f" alt="beli :beli: :beli:"
You really are going to have to expand your vocabulary beyond the social justice terminology you've picked up on tumblr.
How exactly is the lust of straight men being exploited to deprive them of their money "misogynistic"?
In what way is that a display of
dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74581/7458179c37bd5f078c5fe18d8376e34778a36b16" alt="comeon :comeon: :comeon:"
If anything, it's a misandrous treatment and estimation of straight men by reducing them to their baser extincts and manipulating them.
See.
This exactly what I mean.
How can you in one breath, claim that a practice is misogynistic and therefore damaging to women, and then in the very next claim that it is both natural and common for women to engage in said practice if only casually/occasionally.
Yeah.
I know about that.
But I wasn't referring to the gay-for-pay phenomenon.
I know that there exists some sizable portion of female sex-workers who engage in lesbian activity purely for the benefit of the viewers.
However, what I was referencing was the legitimately gay women who engage in sex-work for the pleasure and entertainment of straight men i.e. misandrist lesbian strippers.
I'm not disputing anything presented in this infographic.
It does, however, paint an incomplete picture.
Mostly, because it doesn't account for pornography that is non-visual.
Men are exponentially more sensitive to visual stimuli when it comes to sexual arousal.
Hence, why the majority of visual-porn consumers are men.
So, that explains why straight & gay male preferences dominate this graphic.
But if it were also to account for literary-porn, which is predominantly consumed by women, the figures would be different.
For example, one of the biggest markets in literary porn is guy-on-guy erotica almost exclusively made by, for, and marketed to women.
@Kant could probably tell you a thing or two about her Korean boyband yaoi fetish
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ad9e/7ad9eed4d1c793e530bd46f0dd19c21a487245db" alt="mjpls :mjpls: :mjpls:"
According to you, she should be considered a misandrist for liking that though, right?