Essential The Locker Room's Random Thoughts

StackUp

All Star
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
1,005
Reputation
270
Daps
2,907
Reppin
NJ
i could really use a slice of pizza bro.. being lactose intolerant is for the fukking birds F..UCKKKKKKKKKKK
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
15,025
Reputation
2,230
Daps
71,439
Reppin
NULL
I'm back in school getting my Masters and I just finished up with my semester.

I forgot what it feels like to get off work and have no classes, no assignments, weekends free :ahh:

The next year can't come soon enough.

crying-cry.gif
 

The BasedFather

Task Force
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,871
Reputation
7,399
Daps
90,900
Reppin
Bltch Mob
I’ve been alive longer than I expected to be

And took care of everything that’s expected of me

Took care of my girl and my mother

I told her I’m always here and I love her

I handle shyt differently cause I’m grown now

And the truth is that I’d rather be alone now

I rather not have to deal with the day

And I hate when people ask me how I’m feeling today
 

MajesticLion

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
29,424
Reputation
5,078
Daps
64,100
:dahell::snoop::francis:




Ohio Supreme Court stands by ‘asinine’ ruling that boneless chicken wings do not mean without bones​



The Ohio Supreme Court in July ruled that lower courts were correct to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a man who ate a boneless chicken wing and got a bone stuck in his throat.

“Boneless,” the Republican justices held, describes the “cooking style” of the wings.

“A reasonable consumer could have reasonably anticipated and guarded against the bone at issue in this case,” the majority reasoned.

So he couldn’t make his case to a jury.

This decision was ridiculed nationally. “Late Show” host Stephen Colbert called the decision “hot legal garbage.”

The plaintiff asked the court for reconsideration and a ruling announced Monday handed back the same decision — but not without pointed dissent from Democrats and a citation of cleveland.com’s Editorial Board.

Wrote Democratic Justice Michael P. Donnelly: “If the public cannot trust the judiciary to be faithful in small things — like whether ‘boneless’ can reasonably be understood as not including bones — how can the judiciary be trusted with greater things?”
 
Top