why are reviewers receiving the game 1 month in advance
Because they are reviewers?
why are reviewers receiving the game 1 month in advance
Lol because that's how literally every game works. Reviewers get the game before the public, they play it, write their review and publish it on the embargo date.why are reviewers receiving the game 1 month in advance and the average customers has to wait. If the game is finished, should have released the digital version
this post makes no sense
This happens with literally every big game
Fam.. every single notable game is released to reviewers well in advance lol
Because they are reviewers?
Game publishers tend to hand our review copies early if they are highly confident about the game.practically a full month tho?
correct me if I’m wrong but that doesn’t seem to be the norm
practically a full month tho?
correct me if I’m wrong but that doesn’t seem to be the norm
Game publishers tend to hand our review copies early if they are highly confident about the game.
The earlier they release review copies , the higher of a chance the game has of being good.
Thats why some reviewers get copies like the day before release, so that the bad reviews
dont hurt too much the sales.
practically a full month tho?
correct me if I’m wrong but that doesn’t seem to be the norm
An entire month out is unheard of, you're right.. Like I said earlier in this thread, they are godDAMN confident in this game.
Never seen such flat out confidence and sureness from devs before release tbh.
First AAAA game about to drop in a month
yep think thats gonna be the case for most people saying they were gonna boycott.. once reviews/impressions/hype hit its a wraplol...I was kidding myself earlier talking about not copping it...but realistically there was no way I could miss out on it
So he's saying written leaks about the game not in clips aren't true. Hmmmm. Seems like people were discussing and overreacting to fake news?
You didn't read the first part of the tweet? The "written" leaks that don't have video clips are untrue. Either way I couldn't give a shyt about leaks or gamers upset about something, this shyt si getting copped at early.The most me'me'd parts of the leaks were all accompanied by video clips. So, no.
There was one significant leak, if untrue, would save 'em. Because it ruins the first day.
But, everything that most ppl were mad about was proven.
Understood. But, I knew what part you were making. My point was; most people weren't tripping off the stuff that didn't have video.You didn't read the first part of the tweet? The "written" leaks that don't have video clips are untrue. Either way I couldn't give a shyt about leaks or gamers upset about something, this shyt si getting copped at early.
I can't wait to play the game, read the "spoilers" and the reactions to see what the hell people were "upset" about. lol.Understood. But, I knew what part you were making. My point was; most people weren't tripping off the stuff that didn't have video.