The Great Pyramid, Antarctica & Flat Earth [Discussion Thread]

[null]

It's called Density. You don't need to study physics for that.

So naming something is sufficient.

In that case from now on Electromagnetism no longer exists. The EM effects that you think you see are due to a phenomenon called "Retardissity".

You don't need to study Physics for that.

EDIT:

and these dummies (@Ghostwriter ) don't need school for this:

That ignore list is looking all kind of and juicy these days .

 

[OJ Simpsom]

So naming something is sufficient.

In that case from now on Electromagnetism no longer exists. The EM effects that you think you see are due to a phenomenon called "Retardissity".

You don't need to study Physics for that.

Nice response. Stay woke.

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

That's not the new wave for flat earthers

It's a new concept to YOU, just say that

They have absolutely ZERO VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE from "outer space" yet they think they're experts on galaxies and multiverse based of NASA pictures and press releases.

Yet they disrespect those presenting alternate views with evidence to back it up. They reject Christ because "it's a white mans book" but turnaround and base their entire knowledge of the universe off a white mans theory

 

[xCivicx]

So naming something is sufficient.

In that case from now on Electromagnetism no longer exists. The EM effects that you think you see are due to a phenomenon called "Retardissity".

You don't need to study Physics for that.

EDIT:

and these dummies (@Ghostwriter ) don't need school for this:

That ignore list is looking all kind of and juicy these days .

I can prove to you that electromagnetism exists EASILY

Ancient African civilizations harnessed emag WAY before the european discovered it

Your heart may or may not explode as I'm presenting said proof though

 

[xCivicx]

That is how your binocular vision works.

That how your brain works when your head moves or wrt to your blind spot.
That is why clock hands seem to momentarily move slower when your head moves and focuses on them.
That is why you don't see the black hole in the back of your eye.

If you have two eyes practically everything you see is composite.
And there is a good reason why that is the case with your vision AND with satellite images - namely the limits on field of vision.

'composite images => false' is not an argument.

Gibberish

 

[xCivicx]

Satellite imagery replaced the need for spy planes like the SR71. This was in a time before the proliferation of drones.

Unless you believe drones have subsequently devolved, considering loud, albeit high flying drones only recently began to be shot down.

High altitude balloons have existed for decades

If you've seen the launch of a high altitude balloon you would see that they take machinery up that are the size of cars or larger

Not only that, at any given point military technology is ~25 years ahead of civilian tech so drones very well could have been being used since the first "satellite phone" came into existence

 

[revan]

High altitude balloons have existed for decades

If you've seen the launch of a high altitude balloon you would see that they take machinery up that are the size of cars or larger

Not only that, at any given point military technology is ~25 years ahead of civilian tech so drones very well could have been being used since the first "satellite phone" came into existence

Are you inferring that satellite imagery of Soviet sam sites are actually derived from weather balloons that the red army just decided not to shoot down? Or from drones that couldn’t be shot down then, but can be shot down now? For some reason.

You think drones been around forever and we just didn’t know? Have you been next to a drone? Heard one flying above? Do you understand how it works and the people involved?

 

[xCivicx]

Are you inferring that satellite imagery of Soviet sam sites are actually derived from weather balloons that the red army just decided not to shoot down? Or from drones that couldn’t be shot down then, but can be shot down now? For some reason.

You think drones been around forever and we just didn’t know? Have you been next to a drone? Heard one flying above? Do you understand how it works and the people involved?

I'm not inferring anything that you just inferred in your post

The government shows you a pic and tells you that it's something and you believe them no questions asked

I dont have that problem

There are many ways that intelligence organizations gather mapping info and the majority of those methods existed before the concept of a satellite was invented(it was invented in a sci fi novel btw)

I dont really know why you think you can hear anything multiple miles above you. I mean I've seen planes with my naked eye that were MUCH closer to me that I could BARELY hear

But you expect to hear high altitude machinery?

 

[revan]

I brought up the military’s reliance on satellites during the cold war for a reason. But you keep throwing out hypotheticals and not answering the question posed at you.

The idea that the military relied on intelligence from high altitude weather balloons during the cold war is BS. They would be consistently shot down as they were during testing.

Drones as we know today did not exist. And if you’d posit that they did, why where none shot down? Why can they be shot down now? Air Force policy at the time was to outrun missiles and interceptors rather than infiltrate stealthily. Soviet sams and Foxbats could intercept aircraft flying at 80,000 ft plus.

So after the balloon project failed, the U2 was shot down, the SR71 was deployed and locked up enough times to be pulled from the mission....we still got imagery of Soviet Russia.

How?



And yes you can hear a drone flying above you depending on altitude. You mention drones so much I thought you may have some experience with them, an AF guy trolling for instance.

 

[xCivicx]

I brought up the military’s reliance on satellites during the cold war for a reason. But you keep throwing out hypotheticals and not answering the question posed at you.

The idea that the military relied on intelligence from high altitude weather balloons during the cold war is BS. They would be consistently shot down as they were during testing.

Drones as we know today did not exist. And if you’d posit that they did, why where none shot down? Why can they be shot down now? Air Force policy at the time was to outrun missiles and interceptors rather than infiltrate stealthily. Soviet sams and Foxbats could intercept aircraft flying at 80,000 ft plus.

So after the balloon project failed, the U2 was shot down, the SR71 was deployed and locked up enough times to be pulled from the mission....we still got imagery of Soviet Russia.

How?



And yes you can hear a drone flying above you depending on altitude. You mention drones so much I thought you may have some experience with them, an AF guy trolling for instance.

You just created an entire strawman in your head to argue against

I have no idea what you're talking about

You werent a live during the cold war. You werent working for any governments during the cold war. You dont know WHAT was going on at that time, you just CHOOSE TO BELIEVE the words of known liars, which is your choice

But like I said some us know better

You're in here literally arguing with yourself

 

[revan]

You just created an entire strawman in your head to argue against

I have no idea what you're talking about

You werent a live during the cold war. You werent working for any governments during the cold war. You dont know WHAT was going on at that time, you just CHOOSE TO BELIEVE the words of known liars, which is your choice

But like I said some us know better

You're in here literally arguing with yourself

Nah.

The :juelz: explanation of satellite imagery was that it’s actually “drones” and weather balloons not satellites. To which I’ve explained why that couldn’t be.

You’re choosing to believe something solely based on your desire for it to be true. Whereas at least history supports my perspective. Besides you know the fact I’ve used satellites in 3rd world countries and shyt.

 

[fukkyalifestyle]

@xCivicx do you believe in space? I duno what to think anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if the earth was flat, space didn't exist but different dimensions do? Bunch of different flat earths in different dimensions lol.

 

[OJ Simpsom]

JFK to 9/11: Everything Is a Rich Man's Trick (Video 2014) - IMDb

All the proof you need.

 

[xCivicx]

@xCivicx do you believe in space? I duno what to think anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if the earth was flat, space didn't exist but different dimensions do? Bunch of different flat earths in different dimensions lol.

I definitely do believe that there are unseen forces that act upon us, and I also agree that other dimensions are extremely possible

But nah I don't believe in space anymore

I used to though

 

[xCivicx]

Nah.

The :juelz: explanation of satellite imagery was that it’s actually “drones” and weather balloons not satellites. To which I’ve explained why that couldn’t be.

You’re choosing to believe something solely based on your desire for it to be true. Whereas at least history supports my perspective. Besides you know the fact I’ve used satellites in 3rd world countries and shyt.

I know for a fact that satellites don't exist

Do I know how government intelligence maps "enemy" territories? No

Does that change the fact that "space satellites" factually do not exist? No

Again, you're arguing against yourself. You haven't disproved a single thing I said. You repeated rhetoric from the exact same people trying to change the concept of "chattel slavery" to "indentured servitude" in history books yet you trust them to feed you "history" which is just "his-story"

You are nowhere near mentally prepared for this discussion but you might be one day

And the bold is bs so don't even waste my time with your anecdotes