wilky down again from looks like an uppercut
if you post in this thread after this post, you lost. just saying.
I know one thing, i guarantee you didnt watch that kids two losses, so you cant tell me why he lost. Ur basing it off some illegitimate resume analysis. Theres a reasom why its called the eye test. Stop researching records and tell me what makes him a D level fighter
Yeah and everybody else, including MEXICAN boxing analysts had the Cotto/Canelo fight a draw. I had Canelo winning 7-5. fukk up outta here with these meaningless stan wars . Already confirmed what i was saying too seeinfg thst u obviously never watched the cat who fought spence. Go analyze records, nikka
An eye test tells you he's not a D fighter....but what should I expect out of someone who couldn't fathom Canelo out boxing Cotto?
You may need to get your boxing "eyes" checked. Barrera is a D level fighter and I will make sure to tag you next time he fights someone that's a C fighter or better so we can go over this again
For the last time, he lost twice to nobodies, won his last 2 fights via SD against nobodies, had a height and 6 inch reach advantage and STILL let himself get walked down without even a jab to detour Spence or using movement to make sure he kept Spence at a distance....all things an average fighter with those advantages and ring experience like Barrera had would have done