Youre initial “hint” was sufficient. I’m not stating 99% of Christians are wrong, I’m simply stating you are. Bloodlines wouldn’t be recorded and matched to generational lineages if it weren’t meant to be taken as a literal account. A parable is the use of symbolic language yes, but it doesn’t extend itself beyond that. The Bible deals with the external dynamic world for the large majority of its accounts. From Sumeria, to Egypt, to Babylon, To Rome. Dudes had their eyes open and were quite aware of what was in front of them, this wasn’t Shakespeare writing novels with a glass of wine and a pipe in his mouth
The epidemic of women marrying 'provider' men while cheating on the side with men they are really
- Thread starter Malcolmxxx_23
- Start date
Youre initial “hint” was sufficient. I’m not stating 99% of Christians are wrong, I’m simply stating you are. Bloodlines wouldn’t be recorded and matched to generational lineages if it weren’t meant to be taken as a literal account. A parable is the use of symbolic language yes, but it doesn’t extend itself beyond that. The Bible deals with the external dynamic world for the large majority of its accounts. From Sumeria, to Egypt, to Babylon, To Rome. Dudes had their eyes open and were quite aware of what was in front of them, this wasn’t Shakespeare writing novels with a glass of wine and a pipe in his mouth
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
Tell a man not to marry for looks
He's right
Marrying based solely on looks is a recipe for disaster
No,I am stating that 99% of Christians are wrong. I expect for you to think I am wrong as currently you have been indoctrinated,hopefully you will break away if you continue on the right path. How can you say the bible should be taken as it is written when I am assuming you along with most chritians are reading the translation? Even the passage we were talking about originally,there is debate on whether the part about "He shall strike at your head" should be translated to "she" or "it". In the Neo Vulgate which came out 30 years before the KJV it is translated to "she" which changes the entire context. Plus,how can you believe in any of that bloodline shyt when they will blaytantly depict "Jesus" as Charles Mansons cousin despite a description of how "Jesus" supposedly looked. There is politics and money at play,and whoever controls the money controls the results. We should know this based on who they say the real jews are.There is real life as well as allegory in the bible,not sure why you believe there can't be both.Most Christians lack the discernment and righteousness to even question the bible as it is given to them which is why I can say 99% of them are wrong.
The Fade
I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
thats actually disgusting
RicanFury
Come Home With Me
fits Op's post....dude is a square...the super dude is a street guy....makes sense.
People swear these brolic dudes don’t catch strays too. Women get curious about the opposite, period. Hood bytches cheat on street dudes with squares at times, and good girls cheat with ain’t shyt dudes most of the time. Bad bytches fukk fat slobs that make em laugh. When your girl sees you work/try hard for shyt, she usually gravitates to a dude who seemingly has things comes easier to him.
Tbh, the only way to avoid getting cheated on is to avoid relationships.
Look at you dropping gems...
You were bae until I saw the bolded. That's how you really feel, huh? Your supposed to be my coli bf. Why are you doing this to me bruh?
The Vulgate is a product of the Vatican. The seat of the Beast. So is the nature of them and whatever they produce or involve themselves with. The context changes because that is the purpose. A distortion to substantiate the veneration of “Mary”. Goddess worship as you’re seemingly and I ntimately familiar with. The Vulgate also distorts verse that refers to homosexuallty. It’s rubbish. Secondly, the bloodlines stated in scripture have no relevance to Christ’s modern depiction. What are you suggesting. I referred to it as a example how these figures are seen as historical rather than metaphorical.
“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue , after their families, in their nations.
.”Genesis 10