the earth is spinning faster now!?

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,336
Reputation
8,381
Daps
98,890
Also if people were doing the definition of science. Before the term "science" was created. Sounds like you just allowed the European to put their term on something that was already being done:mjlol:


I guess you think "organic chicken" is a new invention too:mjlol:
 

Th3Birdman

Rookie of The Year
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,924
Reputation
2,198
Daps
11,997
Reppin
Los Angeles
From 1770? Your first problem is these records are likely from so called civilized/ colonized societies. Not people who were living organically in tune with nature

:dead: :dead: :dead:

This man thinks people who "live 'organically' in tune with nature" outlive people in civilized society (a country like America or Japan, for example).

First of all, you have no evidence of this. Provide a single study of a tribe outliving the humans in Japan.

Second of all, those communities literally have no way of fighting off infectious disease without modern medicine, so they lose this battle from jump. In Joseon era Korea (1392-1897), people were dying of cholera, smallpox and syphilis, diseases we have CURES for right now.

Your "organically in tune" bullshyt ain't gonna fly when your entire body is covered in smallpox.

Second problem is pretending war didnt effect those numbers

No one produces life expectancy statistics without accounting for those factors my dude.

You nikkas do the most; you will say anything to avoid the truth and the truth is advances in science allow us to live longer lives. Like this bullshyt:

Considering all the plagues that happened from close proximity living. Babies dying from lead paint,and lead pipes etc.

Imagine trying to argue against the idea that scientific advancement is responsible for longer lifespans, by bringing up plagues, and suggesting they only happened because of "close proximity living"

:dead:

I asked if you thought people eat better now than when we were in nature. And you say yes apparently at peak obesity ,diabetes and heart problems

So, in response to me speaking about humans as a whole, you decide to bring up personal choices people engage in that cause them bodily harm?

Is Japan suffering from an obesity epidemic?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif


Is Sweden suffering from an obesity epidemic?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif


How about Spain, Greece, Italy, Korea, or France?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif



So only certain countries are obese, meaning it's not a modern medicine thing, but places like America not taking personal responsibility?

:martin:


And what make this worse is EVEN WITH THE OBESITY ISSUE, AMERICANS STILL LIVE LONGER THAN NIKKAS IN THE 17TH CENTURY

:martin:

My source: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2017.pdf

Nikka you're not equipped to argue with me, take your spiritual ass on some where and namaste out my face:childplease:
 
Last edited:

Th3Birdman

Rookie of The Year
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,924
Reputation
2,198
Daps
11,997
Reppin
Los Angeles
Also if people were doing the definition of science. Before the term "science" was created. Sounds like you just allowed the European to put their term on something that was already being done:mjlol:


I guess you think "organic chicken" is a new invention too:mjlol:

:deadrose:

This the best y'all could send at me, Coli? Man, next time tag me when a nikka that has more than a 2nd grade education level is bumping them gums.


Ima let this dumb shyt stand on its own, no need for a response :russ::russ::russ:
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
41,816
Reputation
-555
Daps
86,430
Its true 10ndays ago it got dark at 9:30 pm now it got dark at 8:15. That turnaround is 2 quick
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,336
Reputation
8,381
Daps
98,890
:dead: :dead: :dead:

This man thinks people who "live 'organically' in tune with nature" outlive people in civilized society (a country like America or Japan, for example).

First of all, you have no evidence of this. Provide a single study of a tribe outliving the humans in Japan.

Second of all, those communities literally have no way of fighting off infectious disease without modern medicine, so they lose this battle from jump. In Joseon era Korea (1392-1897), people were dying of cholera, smallpox and syphilis, diseases we have CURES for right now.

Your "organically in tune" bullshyt ain't gonna fly when your entire body is covered in smallpox.



No one produces life expectancy statistics without accounting for those factors my dude.

You nikkas do the most; you will say anything to avoid the truth and the truth is advances in science allow us to live longer lives. Like this bullshyt:



Imagine trying to argue against the idea that scientific advancement is responsible for longer lifespans, by bringing up plagues, and suggesting they only happened because of "close proximity living"

:dead:



So, in response to me speaking about humans as a whole, you decide to bring up personal choices people engage in that cause them bodily harm?

Is Japan suffering from an obesity epidemic?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif


Is Sweden suffering from an obesity epidemic?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif


How about Spain, Greece, Italy, Korea, or France?

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif



So only certain countries are obese, meaning it's not a modern medicine thing, but places like America not taking personal responsibility?

:martin:


And what make this worse is EVEN WITH THE OBESITY ISSUE, AMERICANS STILL LIVE LONGER THAN NIKKAS IN THE 17TH CENTURY

:martin:

My source: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2017.pdf

Nikka you're not equipped to argue with me, take your spiritual ass on some where and namaste out my face:childplease:


No,my point is you have no idea how long people who lived organically in tune with nature lived:mjlol:. Do you think indegenious people keep records of that? If there are records it means theyve been touched by the European. You do know the story of how Native Americans were decimated by Europeans diseases right?


You said advancements in quality of life increased life expectancy. Close proximity living is an "advancment" in living conditions. Im only giving you an example of something thats considered an advancment,that helped kill alot of people. Then I gave you guns as well. You said they factor that in,fine.


My point is you dont know and I dont know. You cant accurately tell peoples age by skeletal remains past a certain point. Thosee indegenious people they are digging up could be anywhere from 40-200 years old. Surely the European would have reason to go with 40,so that it looks like advancements saved us all.


My other point is even if people did have lower lifespans.,so what?Youve been Europeanized so you cant see the pro's of more people dying. That was my stance from the jump. Making people live longer isnt truly an advancement in the first place. Its an abomination that we will pay for in due time. But enjoy tiktok until then I guess:respect:
 

ThaBronxBully

Postin’ & Toastin’ Since 02’
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,194
Reputation
8,228
Daps
115,571
Reppin
NYC
So we weren’t going crazy when we thought the years back then were longer than the ones now.


You Mean Days Felt Longer When You We’re A Kid? lol That’s Nothing To Be Alarmed About
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,336
Reputation
8,381
Daps
98,890
And @Th3Birdman all I asked was if you think people eat better now than when we ate from nature. Americans have more diets and studies about diets than anyone. Yet we are the most obese,and create the most overly proccessed and harmful food. So the point is science obviously hasnt taught people how to eat better. People eating from nature dont need to be taught how to eat:mjlol:. They ate what they could and dont eat that much. It really wasnt rocketscience. Let white people teach you how to eat brehs. Next theyll be telling you not to spend more than an hour in the sun,and you will listen.
 

Th3Birdman

Rookie of The Year
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,924
Reputation
2,198
Daps
11,997
Reppin
Los Angeles
No,my point is you have no idea how long people who lived organically in tune with nature lived:mjlol:. Do you think indegenious people keep records of that? If there are records it means theyve been touched by the European

:what:

You fake militant nikkas on this site literally have no concept of the world outside of Black vs White. You think the only people conducting scientific research are Europeans, but forget you have an emerging superpower in Asia (China), two technological marvels in Korea and Japan, and Nigerians on the cutting edge of molecular genetic research.

I mean, you probably don't even know the name "Kizzmekia Corbett" without having to Google.


You said advancements in quality of life increased life expectancy. Close proximity living is an "advancment" in living conditions. Im only giving you an example of something thats considered an advancment,that helped kill alot of people

You're just typing because you can, not because you're saying anything salient. This was a bunch of nonsense that doesn't mean anything.

You need to stop talking. With every single post, you further demonstrate that you are clearly out of your depth, and have no concept of how we know the things we know.

I mean, you said this unironically:

You cant accurately tell peoples age by skeletal remains past a certain point. Thosee indegenious people they are digging up could be anywhere from 40-200 years old

:dead:

It doesn't get any more Dunning-Kruger than this.

Gonna go ahead and toss you on ignore now. You are a waste of my time, and frankly, I'd rather not see these long-winded gish gallops into the endless void that is the bubble atop your shoulders. The only thing denser than you is a black hole. Peace.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,336
Reputation
8,381
Daps
98,890
:what:

You fake militant nikkas on this site literally have no concept of the world outside of Black vs White. You think the only people conducting scientific research are Europeans, but forget you have an emerging superpower in Asia (China), two technological marvels in Korea and Japan, and Nigerians on the cutting edge of molecular genetic research.

I mean, you probably don't even know the name "Kizzmekia Corbett" without having to Google.




You're just typing because you can, not because you're saying anything salient. This was a bunch of nonsense that doesn't mean anything.

You need to stop talking. With every single post, you further demonstrate that you are clearly out of your depth, and have no concept of how we know the things we know.

I mean, you said this unironically:



:dead:

It doesn't get any more Dunning-Kruger than this.

Gonna go ahead and toss you on ignore now. You are a waste of my time, and frankly, I'd rather not see these long-winded gish gallops into the endless void that is the bubble atop your shoulders. The only thing denser than you is a black hole. Peace.

"Similarly, biological anthropologists use the skeleton rather than, say, hair and wrinkles. We term this ‘biological age’ as our judgment is based on the physical (and mental) conditions that we see before us, which relate to the biological realities of that person. These will not always correlate with an accurate calendar age, as people are all, well, different. Their appearance and abilities will be related to their genetics, lifestyle, health, attitudes, activity, diet, wealth and a multitude of other factors. These differences will accumulate as the years increase, meaning that once a person reaches the age of about 40 or 50, the differences are too great to allow any one-size-fits-all accuracy in the determination of the calendar age, whether it is done by eye on a living person or by the peer-preferred method of skeletal ageing. The result of this is that those older than middle age are frequently given an open-ended age estimation, like 40+ or 50+ years, meaning that they could be anywhere between forty and a hundred and four, or thereabouts.

The very term ‘average age at death’ also contributes to the myth. High infant mortality brings down the average at one end of the age spectrum, and open-ended categories such as ‘40+’ or ‘50+ years’ keep it low at the other. We know that in 2015 the average life expectancy at birth ranged from 50 years in Sierra Leone to 84 years in Japan, and these differences are related to early deaths rather than differences in total lifespan. A better method of estimating lifespan is to look at life expectancy only at adulthood, which takes infant mortality out of the equation; however, the inability to estimate age beyond about 50 years still keeps the average lower than it should be."



200 may or may NOT have been a reach on my part.


13 years learning to think like the European in in HS,nevermind college. 52 years working as a battery for white supremacy 8 hours a day til retirement?By my calculations,if your 40 right now. You are probably somewhere around the age of 14 in indeginous years.


But sadly I come across many people like you. Who have an intense need to rationalize the fact we live in an artifical zoo setting. If thats what helps you sleep at night,who am I to judge. But thanking the European for life when you aint living?#CouldntBeMe:respect:. Just send a humble apology if you want off my ignore list.
 
Top