Pull Up the Roots
Veteran
@the cac mamba
Let's stop pretending this guy is just someone with "different views." The pattern of hate is too clear to ignore. Across multiple threads, he's consistently exposed where he really stands, and it's not some neutral, good-faith place. It's a mix of racist, white grievance politics, colorism, coded racism, and reactionary culture war talking points with just enough fake "objectivity" sprinkled in to throw off casual readers.
Let’s break it down:
In the thread about Zimmerman, this dude went through mental gymnastics to avoid calling it what it was: racist violence. Instead, he said:
This is deflection 101. He downplayed the racial element entirely, ignoring the fact that George Zimmerman was publicly embraced by white conservatives *precisely because* he killed a Black kid. Zimmerman was widely accepted as a "white" figure because he acted on behalf of white racial authority, and this dude tried to use his ethnicity to dodge any broader indictment of racism.
He also dropped this:
That's not justice, that's power fantasy. It's not empathy for Trayvon; it's rage at Zimmerman for "failing" in his vigilante role. He wasn't mad about the murder, he was mad that Zimmerman made the team look bad by being sloppy.
He also said did the pseudoskeptical "just asking questions" to present a distorted claim under the guise of asking a question, when he was just saying:
This is a classic racist deflection. It's used to shut down conversations about state violence and white vigilantism by pushing the lie that Black communities are inherently more violent, without any regard for context, poverty, or systemic neglect. It's a favorite Fox News talking point, and it was never about concern. It's about undermining any discussion about racist violence from outside the community.
Translation: "Stop making me uncomfortable with the truth."
This isn't about conversation fatigue or electoral politics, it's white grievance politics. He doesn't want to talk about race unless it's to deny racism, downplay it, or redirect blame. Every time race is brought up, he pretends it's "too much," but when it's time to push right-wing culture war narratives? Suddenly, he's got time.
He said:
This isn't about "preference." This is deeply rooted colorism and dehumanization. The word gross isn't neutral, it's loaded. He tried to soften it by using a cutesy emoticon, but it is tantamount to calling something sickening, vomit inducing, even. He wasn't just stating attraction; he was expressing *disgust* for darker skin. That's textbook anti-Blackness and colonial mentality.
Then he tried to walk it back by saying:
But the issue isn't Mindy Kaling or Indians. It's the fact that he framed disgust as being about skin tone, then tried to hide behind an individual when called out. "I just don't like her" doesn't undo "dark-skinned women are gross."
He said the quiet part out loud, and then tried to gaslight people into thinking it was just about "personal taste." It wasn't. It was racialized, full stop.
His Political Alignment Tells the Rest of the Story:
You don't get to do all that and claim you're just a "contrarian" or someone who "sees both sides." You're not a skeptic, you're fully committed to a far-right worldview, and you hide behind smirking deflections, and cherry-picked facts to avoid accountability.
This is all part of @the cac mamba pattern
None of these comments exist in isolation. They're part of a clear and consistent belief system rooted in white supremacy, colorism, and reactionary grievance politics.
He plays the same game over and over:
It's tired. It's transparent. And it needs to be called out for exactly what it is.
Let's stop pretending this guy is just someone with "different views." The pattern of hate is too clear to ignore. Across multiple threads, he's consistently exposed where he really stands, and it's not some neutral, good-faith place. It's a mix of racist, white grievance politics, colorism, coded racism, and reactionary culture war talking points with just enough fake "objectivity" sprinkled in to throw off casual readers.
Let’s break it down:
In the thread about Zimmerman, this dude went through mental gymnastics to avoid calling it what it was: racist violence. Instead, he said:
This is deflection 101. He downplayed the racial element entirely, ignoring the fact that George Zimmerman was publicly embraced by white conservatives *precisely because* he killed a Black kid. Zimmerman was widely accepted as a "white" figure because he acted on behalf of white racial authority, and this dude tried to use his ethnicity to dodge any broader indictment of racism.
He also dropped this:
That's not justice, that's power fantasy. It's not empathy for Trayvon; it's rage at Zimmerman for "failing" in his vigilante role. He wasn't mad about the murder, he was mad that Zimmerman made the team look bad by being sloppy.
He also said did the pseudoskeptical "just asking questions" to present a distorted claim under the guise of asking a question, when he was just saying:
This is a classic racist deflection. It's used to shut down conversations about state violence and white vigilantism by pushing the lie that Black communities are inherently more violent, without any regard for context, poverty, or systemic neglect. It's a favorite Fox News talking point, and it was never about concern. It's about undermining any discussion about racist violence from outside the community.
Translation: "Stop making me uncomfortable with the truth."
This isn't about conversation fatigue or electoral politics, it's white grievance politics. He doesn't want to talk about race unless it's to deny racism, downplay it, or redirect blame. Every time race is brought up, he pretends it's "too much," but when it's time to push right-wing culture war narratives? Suddenly, he's got time.
He said:
This isn't about "preference." This is deeply rooted colorism and dehumanization. The word gross isn't neutral, it's loaded. He tried to soften it by using a cutesy emoticon, but it is tantamount to calling something sickening, vomit inducing, even. He wasn't just stating attraction; he was expressing *disgust* for darker skin. That's textbook anti-Blackness and colonial mentality.
Then he tried to walk it back by saying:
But the issue isn't Mindy Kaling or Indians. It's the fact that he framed disgust as being about skin tone, then tried to hide behind an individual when called out. "I just don't like her" doesn't undo "dark-skinned women are gross."
He said the quiet part out loud, and then tried to gaslight people into thinking it was just about "personal taste." It wasn't. It was racialized, full stop.
Oh, right, you can't. He went back and deleted the post:
But it was quoted already:
But it was quoted already:
easily indians
you might point out a few good lookin light skin indian girls but those dark skin indians are just
His Political Alignment Tells the Rest of the Story:
- He voted for Trump in 2016, 2020, and 2024
- Supported Ron DeSantis
- Regularly posts white nationalist and neo-Nazi Twitter accounts as sources
- Repeats every culture war talking point in the book
You don't get to do all that and claim you're just a "contrarian" or someone who "sees both sides." You're not a skeptic, you're fully committed to a far-right worldview, and you hide behind smirking deflections, and cherry-picked facts to avoid accountability.
This is all part of @the cac mamba pattern
None of these comments exist in isolation. They're part of a clear and consistent belief system rooted in white supremacy, colorism, and reactionary grievance politics.
He plays the same game over and over:
- Start with "neutral" sounding takes
- Inject racist or bigoted views couched in "preferences" or "facts"
- Backpedals when called out
- Accuse others of being too emotional or race-obsessed
- Reaffirm support for white nationalist figures and ideologies
It's tired. It's transparent. And it needs to be called out for exactly what it is.
