6-2 Just beat Boston
Facts....Only idiots were using the other teams record. Ain't got shyt to say cuz Boston the #2 seed
Put some fukking respect on Dinwiddie's name
The Brooklyn Nets are better off without Kyrie Irving (12-5 record without him) UPDATE:HE RESPONDS
- Thread starter Darealtwo1
- Start date
Facts....Only idiots were using the other teams record. Ain't got shyt to say cuz Boston the #2 seed
Put some fukking respect on Dinwiddie's name
The first good team they've beaten and you think it's cause to suggest what, exactly?6-2 Just beat Boston
Are you here to have a genuine discussion or are you just trying to layer some dumbass agenda from the OP like you've been doing all throughout this thread?
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
So the Nets are better without Caris LeVert?6-2 Just beat Boston
THE MACHINE
night owl
This was your dumbass quote
Then they beat Boston and now you start juelzingOh, would you look at that, when the Nets aren't playing bad teams, they lose.....
It suggests that your original post was incorrect.
Genuine discussion, you want to post cherry picked stats like teams are really going to be deficient all across the board when he plays, of course he adds value in some areas, but wins and losses are the bottom line. And the bottom line over the past few seasons suggest he isn't as important to winning as his game is pretty.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
Again...are the Nets better without Caris LeVert?
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
You typed all of this shyt without making a single in game post in the Nets thread.
stop being a pretend watcher of the Nets applying some wack basketball theory that can apply to any team that wins without their star.
why are you dudes in here such fake sports fans?
these nikkas talking shyt ain’t watching shyt...they’re just repeating shyt they heard talking heads say on BSPN or wherever and dropping #s w/ zero context lol
There's nothing "dumbass" about it.
The foundations of this thread were created by manipulating small sample sizes of data with absolutely no regards to context. I debunked it all and highlighted that they've lost to the good teams they've played. Winning ONE game against a good team in an ideal spot (back at home, against a team they just lost to) doesn't disprove nor take away from my point, after all, the argument of this thread is that they're better without him, is it not?
One game doesn't prove anything. It is only one game. Or do your reactionary senses not allow you to make out that concept?
You've already made it abundantly clear in this thread that you're not.
Hence why you ignored all my posts tearing down your shyt earlier in the piece, and why you're getting behind a thread which fails to contextualize anything.
How the fukk are you gonna claim that I'm posting cherry-picked stats like this thread isn't built on them? Why do you have a problem with the perception of what you think I'm doing when OP is actually guilty of these tactics?
It's not as simple as that, and if you think it is, perhaps basketball isn't the game for you.
THE MACHINE
night owl
I don't know. When D'Russ was there I would say he was better off not starting. Id have to look it up though.
I'm not pretending to be more than a casual Nets watcher. I'm a fan of Kyries game so of course Ive watched more games while he's been there but the results are speaking for themselves. Y'all are playing well over the last 8 games. Y'all were bad over the first 11 games, some of which I watched. Boston is playing well without him. They played well in the playoffs without him in 2018. Cavs made the Finals the year after he left in 2018. Boston had their worst year in the last 3 when he was healthy for the playoffs. They are looking good again after he left. Brooklyn starts off 4-7 with him, he gets hurt and they go 6-2. This has been a consistent theme for him over the last few years. I haven't seen enough of Caris to apply this. You guys are acting like I'm saying hes a bum. Hes a phenomenal talent and contributes well to team success, just not as much at it would appear based on how aesthetically pleasing his game appears. There is a career of Ws and Ls with and without him to look at.
And yes, he was absolutely amazing in the 2016 playoffs/finals.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
But you are pretending. Kyrie wasnt hurting the Nets. Nor was Caris. But “i’MnOt sURe CaRIs iS hURtInG tHe NEtS bUt KNOW KyRIe iS aLTHoUgH I dOn’T wATcH tHeM rEGuLarLy!”
we are talking about his play with the NETS...the NETS.
Why do you guys fake sports talk? Why?
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Look at this nikka running up in here sticking out his chest over the Nets winning without Kyrie and then admitting he's nothing more than a casual viewer.
Oh, would you look at that, when the Nets aren't playing bad teams, they lose.....
