Absolut da poet ®
Jubilado
You're assuming the stone would've been destroyed on Asguard which it may not have
And could also have been stolen by someone else
And could also have been stolen by someone else
The Avengers should have let the Space Stone be destroyed in Ragnarok
- Thread starter Rhapscallion Démone
- Start date
The stones aren't indestructible and Surtur, Hela are both close to Thanos in strength.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
You're claiming there is a plot hole not them. What is it?Neither have the Russo bros
The one they dodged in that article you posted
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I'm too dumb to pick it out. Just tell me. lolThe one they dodged in that article you posted
Pretend you are talking to someone not privy to the article and you are explaining it to them.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I don't think you can even explain what you are talking about is what's really happening. The Avengers didn't go back in time to Ragnarok like you wanted doesn't constitute a plot hole.
I can and did explain my point. The Russo brothers kinda wrote themselves into a plot whole
MajesticLion
Veteran
The glaring plot hole in this entire thread is that the Stones can't be destroyed. 
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Except Thanos did destroy all the stones. That's why they had to do the time heist in the first place.The glaring plot hole in this entire thread is that the Stones can't be destroyed.
humminbird
Veteran
I think only a stone can destroy a stone honestlyExcept Thanos did destroy all the stones. That's why they had to do the time heist in the first place.
He's probably just confused more than anything.
Do these nikkas watch movies or just skim through it
That cap thought it was Loki disguised as him
The glaring plot hole in this entire thread is that the Stones can't be destroyed.
Uhhhh....
I think I finally get it now,your going to the past,but technically its the future because your doing it later than the present.