The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Do you agree with Truman's decision?

Do you agree with Truman's decision to use atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,192
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,937
Reppin
CookoutGang
Well even according to this so called “scholar” and his definition of “peace” which is rather Orwellian, the structures of society had experienced more upheaval in Europe and the United Stayes during the post war period domestically than any other periods preceding it; civil rights as a perfect example.
Rather to me the only unquestioned stable by product of the post war dynamic was the American hegemony and imperialism that permeated thoroughly during that so called peace period.

To refer to a period as peaceful after acknowledging the widespread deaths and tribulations experienced by the brunt of humanity is already ghoulish on its face. Adding to that however that it was peaceful because the structures of power remained “stable” adds another level of grotesque delusion to the matter.

The restaraunt food is “delicious” not because it tastes good, but because the servers are white.

Are you in good faith attempting argue:

  1. We have seen less major conflicts between world powers?
  2. When we do see conflicts there is less death per 100k?
  3. That since WWII society has experienced modernization at a rate much higher than any time before?
:feedme:


I'd also argue that your view of what is peace is largely more stringent due to the more peaceful world you've lived in as a result of WWII's conclusion. The very fact that you're only speaking on local, regional, and civil war kind of affirms the thesis. Perspective matters.
 
Last edited:

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,938
Reputation
2,478
Daps
58,609
Reppin
Raleigh
"opportunity and pretext to use new toys :ehh:"

I do not agree with Truman's decision

This was a great decision in hindsight. if people didn't see the destruction it caused, I have no doubt we wouldn't have made it pass the fifties without nukes being used. The two dropped showed the power of the weapon and made everyone fear it as they should.
 

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,275
Reputation
14,855
Daps
274,379
This was a great decision in hindsight. if people didn't see the destruction it caused, I have no doubt we wouldn't have made it pass the fifties without nukes being used. The two dropped showed the power of the weapon and made everyone fear it as they should.

Hey, I'm a "look at the bright side" kinda guy as well but seeing the good in the outcome of a terrible decisions doesn't make the decision good.

:hubie:
 

Marks

as a mountain
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
3,148
Reputation
1,307
Daps
12,644
It absolutely destroyed the Japanese spirit which I think was the goal. Japan wasn't gonna go quietly, everybody supposed to fight and go out standing was apart of their culture thanks to Emperor and propaganda. America had bombed everything to shyt already, I forgot the numbers but something like majority of urban and metropolitan areas in Japan were completely flattened already by time they drop the A bombs. On one occasion America ran fire bomb runs for 2 days straight in and around Tokyo. Something like 200k civillians estimated to have been killed. They actually warned pilots that if they got shot down to get to the ocean ASAP because Japanese civillians would probably do them bad in retaliation.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,011
Reputation
2,468
Daps
132,965
This was a great decision in hindsight. if people didn't see the destruction it caused, I have no doubt we wouldn't have made it pass the fifties without nukes being used. The two dropped showed the power of the weapon and made everyone fear it as they should.
Yeah this a good point i haven't thought about
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,290
Reputation
18,320
Daps
235,163
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
This was a great decision in hindsight. if people didn't see the destruction it caused, I have no doubt we wouldn't have made it pass the fifties without nukes being used. The two dropped showed the power of the weapon and made everyone fear it as they should.

Not to mention, a full scale invasion of Japan would’ve probably had far more casualties.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,290
Reputation
3,818
Daps
106,744
Reppin
Detroit
Absolutely. It ended war and ushered in the most peaceful era in modern history. Most of the advancements, freedom of movement and safeguards are a result of that display of power.

I expect this thread to be full of folks who will he critical of this decision while also cheerleadong for Iran and other countries to have nuclear weapons because to the deterrence they offer will allow those countries "freedom." :pachaha:

Only the most depraved of American sociopaths would think mass murdering civilians was correct.

Them's fighting words :skip:
 
Top