Nah bro. She went completely out of her way to try to take away this Black woman’s livelihood. Posting her pic without authorization on top of it. She’s lucky that’s all she got
Nah bro. She went completely out of her way to try to take away this Black woman’s livelihood. Posting her pic without authorization on top of it. She’s lucky that’s all she got
If the shoe were on the other foot we'd be saying it was too much, let's call a spade a spade. It was harsh but not unwarranted. There's a difference.
who's we? you and the soft shoe brigade? ya'll love speaking in hypothetical instead of realityIf the shoe were on the other foot we'd be saying it was too much, let's call a spade a spade. It was harsh but not unwarranted. There's a difference.
She works for the world bank her writing is not her source of income and that was a move the publisher made probably anticipating a negative wave of feedback for their product. You are looking at this entirely the wrong way. It's a PR move for them as much as anything else. People were gonna slaughter her reviews or were already.If the shoe were on the other foot we'd be saying it was too much, let's call a spade a spade. It was harsh but not unwarranted. There's a difference.
Interesting.She works for the world bank her writing is not her source of income .
First comment?
I legitimately don't like Cacs
find and tweet her facebook, myspace, linkedin, pof or wateva and tag her employer until the world bank starts to andShe’s deleted her twitter account and gone into hiding.