Wrong, 99% chance they didn't kill her on purpose or even know she was there...
They got the drop on Ronnie and approached from a position of stealth. They stopped where they did, 10 yards or so from the car, because it gave them a perceived advantage from the direction they approached. If you move in closer, you risk him catching you, and he's already head in the car vacuuming, so you have to assume that he's strapped. You risk him catching you first, if you approach closer. So you get within firing distance, and you start letting him have it...
The windows look tinted, you can't discern there's a small child in the back from the distance they opened at. Granted, this is my speculation, for all I know when they first spotted Ronnie, wherever they were, or whoever told them where he was at, told them his kid was with him. You never know...
But going off the video posted, it's highly likely that these guys didn't even know the child was in there. Not that it matters in the court of law. But it matters in the context of conversation us regular people are having surrounding their deaths...
I saw that the police have a suspect identified and warrants out. When you hit someone in broad day like this, you gotta make sure that you cover your tracks enough to create reasonable doubt. If they took their own car, or cell phones, or have any written record talking about doing Ronnie, they in trouble. Murder is the hardest case to prove, because the primary witness is dead. Mf's have situations that look like lock convictions, that get dismissed or acquittals all the time...
So if you on a broad day hit, they'd better have covered their tracks well enough to create reasonable doubt...
A harsh truth of this, is that, unless implicit info comes out that the shooters knew his daughter was with him, Ronnie is the reason his child was killed. Whatever happened that led to guys coming to look for him, as a guy in these activities he owed it to her to protect her from this...