That has nothing to do with the fact that he’s stating the people in the agency misled him falsely.
In other words, your comparison is just to make it seem as if him not taking the iron man role is the reason why his agency SHOULDNT show him correct information, or that his agency SHOULD collude with the studios to short change him.
That sounds stupid as fukk.
What’s bad is instead of people viewing it as a typical contractual debate between him and his agency, the first thing nikkas are saying is “he broke” or “he should have done this” knowing damn well he isn’t broke and if he did do what you said, he would have sold himself short, which, you would think, real ass mfers would support to NOT sell yourself short.