Tarq Nasheed Takes Aim At The Gay Agenda

[get these nets]

social media is just broadcasting how uninformed and gleeful ignorant people can be

any “shookness” comes from people who can’t deal with any adversity.

No, people are afraid to not be in sync with what others are thinking/saying at the moment.

If we do a search here, we can probably find you making a gay joke..but in 2018 you are actually writing.

well I mean you find something about two adult men having consensual sex worthy of mockery

Now, have your views evolved independently?, did you mature in that time? , or are you now afraid to make that same joke?

This isn't a dig at you personally. If people just said, listen.....I won't put my livelihood at risk by telling my true feelings, I could respect it. But this other shyt.......is all bullshyt.

 

[Ya' Cousin Cleon]

I make jokes about eating booty and butt play related expierences

I’m not one to tell anyone what they can and can’t say.

but to act like everyone should know and be aware that you’re joking on top of being ok with it is where you’re gonna find yourself doing a lot of justifying on your behalf

because the thing is, the people who are usually being goofed on know what the deal is fam and that it’s more than just “jokes.”

same we can with cacs who make jokes about us

No, people are afraid to not be in sync with what others are thinking/saying at the moment.

If we do a search here, we can probably find you making a gay joke..but in 2018 you are actually writing.



Now, have your views evolved independently?, did you mature in that time? , or are you now afraid to make that same joke?

This isn't a dig at you personally. If people just said, listen.....I won't put my livelihoodat risk by telling my true feelings, I could respect it. But this other shyt.......is all bullshyt.

 

[get these nets]

I make jokes about eating booty and butt play related expierences

I’m not one to tell anyone what they can and can’t say.

but to act like everyone should know and be aware that you’re joking on top of being ok with it is where you’re gonna find yourself doing a lot of justifying on your behalf

because the thing is, the people who are usually being goofed on know what the deal is fam and that it’s more than just “jokes.”

same we can with cacs who make jokes about us

You've made jokes where "gay" is the punchline.
The fact that you're copping pleas about random jokes you've made here , is along the lines of what I meant about people being shook.

 

[Worthless Loser]

The new Buck Breaking tactic is where white supremacists use their negro flunkies to shame Black men into having sex with transexuals

If black men are doing this, it's not because they are being shamed into it.

 

[Ya' Cousin Cleon]

get to searching for em then

and I ain’t shook of shyt

I own up to mines

You've made jokes where "gay" is the punchline.
The fact that you're copping pleas about random jokes you've made here , is along the lines of what I meant about people being shook.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Y’all pray for Tariq, he’s going into dangerous territory with this

 

[8WON6]

i agree with his initial point about black men being labeled more homophobic than other groups and it being used to deflect from other issues. I'm not going to to defend that shaming into sex part. It's too bad he put that in there because that's all people are focusing on.

 

[get these nets]

 

[GoFlipAPack]

I dont give a fuk what nobody say. No man will ever be attractive to me.

 

[xoxodede]

I have been trying to find any truth/proof to "Buck Breaking" for over a year now -- and I am convinced it is a myth.

Male-on-male sexual abuse definitely did occur -- in addition to male enslaved being raped by white women. But. Buck Breaking.... I haven't found any solid proof.

References to the sexual abuse of male slaves by white male owners in the historical record; a handful of slave narratives (including Harriet Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl) contain references that seem to clearly refer to non-consensual, exploitative same-sex activity; at least one study of abolitionist rhetoric has identified how some strands of abolitionist thought tried to imply that there was an inherently homoerotic component to the exploitation of male slaves that could and did culminate in sexual abuse.

Indeed, abolitionists went to great lengths to highlight sexual abuse as a particular, masculine act of depravity in general. Plantation owner Thomas Thistlewood quite notably made explicit reference to the practice in Jamaica even in the 1700s, when he briefly drew attention in his diary to news that another slave owner had been accused of committing sodomy with one of his male domestic servants.​

Additional references:

• Thomas Foster, "The Sexual Abuse of Black Men Under American Slavery", Journal of the History of Sexuality (2011): 445 - 464.
  
  
• Thomas Foster, Long before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America (mainly John Salliant, "The Black Body Erotic and the Republican Body Politic").
  
  
• Fay Yarborough, "Power, Perception, and Interracial Sex: Former Slaves Recall a Multiracial South", The Journal of Southern History 71, no. 3 (2005): 559 - 588.
  
  
• Trevor Burnard, Mastery, Tyranny and Desire: Thomas Thistlewood and his Slaves in the Anglo Jamaican World (2004).
  
  
• William Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendship (2006)

 

[Apollo Creed]

I have been trying to find any truth/proof to "Buck Breaking" for over a year now -- and I am convinced it is a myth.

Male-on-male sexual abuse definitely did occur -- in addition to male enslaved being raped by white women. But. Buck Breaking.... I haven't found any solid proof.

References to the sexual abuse of male slaves by white male owners in the historical record; a handful of slave narratives (including Harriet Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl) contain references that seem to clearly refer to non-consensual, exploitative same-sex activity; at least one study of abolitionist rhetoric has identified how some strands of abolitionist thought tried to imply that there was an inherently homoerotic component to the exploitation of male slaves that could and did culminate in sexual abuse.

Indeed, abolitionists went to great lengths to highlight sexual abuse as a particular, masculine act of depravity in general. Plantation owner Thomas Thistlewood quite notably made explicit reference to the practice in Jamaica even in the 1700s, when he briefly drew attention in his diary to news that another slave owner had been accused of committing sodomy with one of his male domestic servants.​

Additional references:

• Thomas Foster, "The Sexual Abuse of Black Men Under American Slavery", Journal of the History of Sexuality (2011): 445 - 464.
  
  
• Thomas Foster, Long before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America (mainly John Salliant, "The Black Body Erotic and the Republican Body Politic").
  
  
• Fay Yarborough, "Power, Perception, and Interracial Sex: Former Slaves Recall a Multiracial South", The Journal of Southern History 71, no. 3 (2005): 559 - 588.
  
  
• Trevor Burnard, Mastery, Tyranny and Desire: Thomas Thistlewood and his Slaves in the Anglo Jamaican World (2004).
  
  
• William Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendship (2006)

Do you feel that if something isn't in a book that means it did not happen?

 

[alpo]

I have been trying to find any truth/proof to "Buck Breaking" for over a year now -- and I am convinced it is a myth.

Male-on-male sexual abuse definitely did occur -- in addition to male enslaved being raped by white women. But. Buck Breaking.... I haven't found any solid proof.

References to the sexual abuse of male slaves by white male owners in the historical record; a handful of slave narratives (including Harriet Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl) contain references that seem to clearly refer to non-consensual, exploitative same-sex activity; at least one study of abolitionist rhetoric has identified how some strands of abolitionist thought tried to imply that there was an inherently homoerotic component to the exploitation of male slaves that could and did culminate in sexual abuse.

Indeed, abolitionists went to great lengths to highlight sexual abuse as a particular, masculine act of depravity in general. Plantation owner Thomas Thistlewood quite notably made explicit reference to the practice in Jamaica even in the 1700s, when he briefly drew attention in his diary to news that another slave owner had been accused of committing sodomy with one of his male domestic servants.​

Additional references:

• Thomas Foster, "The Sexual Abuse of Black Men Under American Slavery", Journal of the History of Sexuality (2011): 445 - 464.
  
  
• Thomas Foster, Long before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America (mainly John Salliant, "The Black Body Erotic and the Republican Body Politic").
  
  
• Fay Yarborough, "Power, Perception, and Interracial Sex: Former Slaves Recall a Multiracial South", The Journal of Southern History 71, no. 3 (2005): 559 - 588.
  
  
• Trevor Burnard, Mastery, Tyranny and Desire: Thomas Thistlewood and his Slaves in the Anglo Jamaican World (2004).
  
  
• William Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendship (2006)

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

I have been trying to find any truth/proof to "Buck Breaking" for over a year now -- and I am convinced it is a myth.

Male-on-male sexual abuse definitely did occur -- in addition to male enslaved being raped by white women. But. Buck Breaking.... I haven't found any solid proof.

References to the sexual abuse of male slaves by white male owners in the historical record; a handful of slave narratives (including Harriet Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl) contain references that seem to clearly refer to non-consensual, exploitative same-sex activity; at least one study of abolitionist rhetoric has identified how some strands of abolitionist thought tried to imply that there was an inherently homoerotic component to the exploitation of male slaves that could and did culminate in sexual abuse.

Indeed, abolitionists went to great lengths to highlight sexual abuse as a particular, masculine act of depravity in general. Plantation owner Thomas Thistlewood quite notably made explicit reference to the practice in Jamaica even in the 1700s, when he briefly drew attention in his diary to news that another slave owner had been accused of committing sodomy with one of his male domestic servants.​

Additional references:

• Thomas Foster, "The Sexual Abuse of Black Men Under American Slavery", Journal of the History of Sexuality (2011): 445 - 464.
  
  
• Thomas Foster, Long before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America (mainly John Salliant, "The Black Body Erotic and the Republican Body Politic").
  
  
• Fay Yarborough, "Power, Perception, and Interracial Sex: Former Slaves Recall a Multiracial South", The Journal of Southern History 71, no. 3 (2005): 559 - 588.
  
  
• Trevor Burnard, Mastery, Tyranny and Desire: Thomas Thistlewood and his Slaves in the Anglo Jamaican World (2004).
  
  
• William Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendship (2006)

No you haven’t...

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

I have been trying to find any truth/proof to "Buck Breaking" for over a year now -- and I am convinced it is a myth.

Male-on-male sexual abuse definitely did occur -- in addition to male enslaved being raped by white women. But. Buck Breaking.... I haven't found any solid proof.

References to the sexual abuse of male slaves by white male owners in the historical record; a handful of slave narratives (including Harriet Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl) contain references that seem to clearly refer to non-consensual, exploitative same-sex activity; at least one study of abolitionist rhetoric has identified how some strands of abolitionist thought tried to imply that there was an inherently homoerotic component to the exploitation of male slaves that could and did culminate in sexual abuse.

Indeed, abolitionists went to great lengths to highlight sexual abuse as a particular, masculine act of depravity in general. Plantation owner Thomas Thistlewood quite notably made explicit reference to the practice in Jamaica even in the 1700s, when he briefly drew attention in his diary to news that another slave owner had been accused of committing sodomy with one of his male domestic servants.​

Additional references:

• Thomas Foster, "The Sexual Abuse of Black Men Under American Slavery", Journal of the History of Sexuality (2011): 445 - 464.
  
  
• Thomas Foster, Long before Stonewall: Histories of Same-Sex Sexuality in Early America (mainly John Salliant, "The Black Body Erotic and the Republican Body Politic").
  
  
• Fay Yarborough, "Power, Perception, and Interracial Sex: Former Slaves Recall a Multiracial South", The Journal of Southern History 71, no. 3 (2005): 559 - 588.
  
  
• Trevor Burnard, Mastery, Tyranny and Desire: Thomas Thistlewood and his Slaves in the Anglo Jamaican World (2004).
  
  
• William Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendship (2006)

And Im convinced you're a fukking moron. NEGGED

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

And Im convinced you're a fukking moron. NEGGED

Yeah... he might be full of shyt with that post