Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[OG Talk]

that's where Tariq played himself - with that said he still won, cause Shultz is a complete dikkhead

Racism isn't better or worse today. It's just evolved. His rape analogy was on point.

The goal is not to be raped by a smaller dikk. It's to not get raped at all.

The problem with America is they set the bar so low for human rights for Black people, we look at things like red lining, police brutality, gentrification and the prison industrial system replacing legal slavery as "progress"

Tariq wasn't having that.. Neither should any of us frankly..

White supremacy isn't something you can get better at. It just needs to be abolished. If not it just mutates into different forms.

 

[kingofnyc]

Yo this white is trying to convince Charlec00n that gun violence exist because of poor people. Charlemagne dropped that c00n persona and you could tell a limit was crossed.

real talk
the 1st half was more interesting debate with CTG & his brother chris ; then the 2nd half with Tariq

gotta say, for someone who really wanted this show to happen - i was a lil disappointed

 

[ALonelyDad]

when is he going to be on breakfast club

 

[Sithlord Piff]

Shulz stayed using moist examples for everything.
"What if I called you a suspected homosexual"?

 

[Gravity]

This thread went from, "aight breh...difference of opinion" to "TF!? Did we listen to the same podcast??" real quick...

This "debate" (using the term loosely) wasn't what some folks in here are trying to make it out to be. Brehs talkin bout the syntax and strategies of a debate, having statistical data to support arguments (as if the host wasn't interjecting, deflecting, being borderline insulting, and curt) ect. The guest and the host were talking about their difference of opinions, loosely supported by social normatives, personal experiences, conjecture, and scopes that do not tell the entire story.

It's a fukking podcast with two people talkin shyt about why they don't agree totally and their condensed reasons as to why they arrive at their conclusions. If these two had the time (which would be forever considering the subject), both would and could be much more articulate and sound much more reasonable.

That said, Tariq's points were much more effective and made a hell of a lot more sense than Shultz.

Why folks in this thread ACTIN like they need a bunch of rattling off of numbers and peer-reviewed essays to support what is obvious is beyond me. Just sayin, if it's raining outside, do you Google "historical weather patterns in my region", refer to an almanac, and/or blame HAARP?? No. The fact that it's raining is conclusion enough and you should dress appropriately.

Don't be dense for the sake of being contrary brehs. Be better than that.

Good shyt. It's sad to read how dense a lot of posters here are.
"Shultz had him on the ropes when he asked if things are exactly the same as during slavery". That's not a "point", it's a deflection. "It was a good point when he brought how good Nigerians are doing". That's not a valid point either. His point in bringing up Nigerians is that they're success proves that there's no systematic white supremacy which is false. Regardless how well Nigerians do in education, there's a system of white supremacy in place that privileges whites by discriminating/oppressing non whites blacks especially. Nigerians being successful in education doesn't change that.

Tariq lost points every time he suggested that a black person in who managed to be in a position of influence or power was a "Token". That's a weak argument, which proved Andrew's point.

What was dude's "point"? You're not even taking issue with Nasheed's point you're arguing over semantics. "He should've used this word instead of that one". You're ignoring the point dude. The point is that delft individual blacks who are successful doesn't negate the faft that we live in system that keeps blacks oppressed to privilege whites. You cats cats help crackers deflect and its c00n shyt.

 

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

Schultz constantly mischaeacterizes statements made by his opponent and then makes his argument.

All Tariq needed to do was argue the exact points he made.

Shultz also just explores statements without making any definitive point. In other words Schultz is smart to dumb people.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Tariq lost points every time he suggested that a black person in who managed to be in a position of influence or power was a "Token". That's a weak argument, which proved Andrew's point.

ONLY cause Schulz was being naive.

He knows damn well Schulz was trolling with the "a black Harvard guy says shootings are equal among races"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

corey holcomb would destroy schulz in 5 minutes

THIS

Lowkey, makes you want to see what'd happen because Corey don't give ANY fukks.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Schultz constantly mischaeacterizes statements made by his opponent and then makes his argument.

All Tariq needed to do was argue the exact points he made.

Shultz also just explores statements without making any definitive point. In other words Schultz is smart to dumb people.

thats where Tariq nailed him at the end:

"you're just trying to pretend to be more eloquent and babble your way through bullshyt so you can impress people so everyone thinks 'Gee thats one smart white guy' but we all know that was a load of shyt"

 

[K.O.N.Y]

Good shyt. It's sad to read how dense a lot of posters here are.
His point in bringing up Nigerians is that they're success proves that there's no systematic white supremacy which is false. Regardless how well Nigerians do in education, there's a system of white supremacy in place that privileges whites by discriminating/oppressing non whites blacks especially. Nigerians being successful in education doesn't change that.

.

I agree 100%

And i maybe wrong. But the whole pit recent immigrants vs a people who've been in america for hundreds of years seems to be a classic W.S talking point,their numbers are significantly smaller
It would seem that they could just as easily choose to highlight AA's who have prospered vs those who have not. Yet they go the immigrant route

 

[K.O.N.Y]

THIS

Lowkey, makes you want to see what'd happen because Corey don't give ANY fukks.

can you recommend any good videos of his

 

[USSInsiders]

 

[No Sleep]

Shultz is not suspected anymore. The way he was dodging questions.
He said blacks are in jail because of lasting effects of slavery and jim crow instead of saying white supremacy

 

[m0rninggl0ry]

Well Malcolm did say that the most dangerous cac is a cac moderate.


EDIT: Sorry it was MLK who said that but Brother Malcolm also had some choice words for cac liberals.

 

[Zero]

Schulz is the worst type of white person.

Somewhat Liberal, grew up around/near blacks, acknowledges the existence of racism/white supremacy, but you bring up an example of WS, he acts like a troglodyte and freaks out, tries his hardest to invalidate any facts presented

He'd fit right in on Neogaf