Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[Here Comes the Pain]

Keyword:white supremacy


The white boy had him on the ropes. Felt like Tariq was like 2 or 3 steps behind tryna catch Schultz.

This white boy basically called him fool's gold.

 

[EndDomination]

He trying to flip it to Nigerians. Ain't no fukking rich Nigerians in South Carolina I know of.

Wait didn't they kick Shyne out this country? Was he not a citizen?

Shyne is Belizean, his dad is the Prime Minister of Belize.
He only had a green card, and that felony conviction had him tossed out of the country.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Keyword:white supremacy


The white boy had him on the ropes. Felt like Tariq was like 2 or 3 steps behind tryna catch Schultz.

This white boy basically called him fool's gold.

fam. he said that white supremacy runs islam.

 

[HabitualLineSteppa]

This thread went from, "aight breh...difference of opinion" to "TF!? Did we listen to the same podcast??" real quick...

This "debate" (using the term loosely) wasn't what some folks in here are trying to make it out to be. Brehs talkin bout the syntax and strategies of a debate, having statistical data to support arguments (as if the host wasn't interjecting, deflecting, being borderline insulting, and curt) ect. The guest and the host were talking about their difference of opinions, loosely supported by social normatives, personal experiences, conjecture, and scopes that do not tell the entire story.

It's a fukking podcast with two people talkin shyt about why they don't agree totally and their condensed reasons as to why they arrive at their conclusions. If these two had the time (which would be forever considering the subject), both would and could be much more articulate and sound much more reasonable.

That said, Tariq's points were much more effective and made a hell of a lot more sense than Shultz.

Why folks in this thread ACTIN like they need a bunch of rattling off of numbers and peer-reviewed essays to support what is obvious is beyond me. Just sayin, if it's raining outside, do you Google "historical weather patterns in my region", refer to an almanac, and/or blame HAARP?? No. The fact that it's raining is conclusion enough and you should dress appropriately.

Don't be dense for the sake of being contrary brehs. Be better than that.

 

[O.G.B]

so who really won?

everybody is saying something different

@CodeBlaMeVi is a known Tariq cynic, so you can take his comments on the debate vs Schultz with a grain of salt.

 

[UpAndComing]

"Meth has been around since 1887 btw"

Basically backing Tariq's point. Charlamagne's first un-c00n statement in a minute

 

[Box Factory]

This is a terrible "debate". Both of these guys are terrible debaters and just trying to win mini arguments without the ability to do so.

Very hard to listen to because they're such terrible debaters

 

[Maschine_Man]

• Police,
• prosecutors, judges,
  
• doctors
  
• hr managers, supervisors, ceos,
• loan processors,
  
• mayors,
  
• city officials.

These people have the power to affect your livelihood, your freedom, your health and if they choose deny you any of those things because of your race, that's basically racism.

Now you can say that Blacks hold those positions, and that's true; But there isn't a noted history of a Black police officer killing a white person because they are white.

You can't list all those power positions, say that blacks hold those positions, then limit your one example to black police.

I agree that the levels are even close right now, however, to say that they don't exist is something else(in know you aren't saying that, but that is the argument)

 

[dondraper]

fam. he said that white supremacy runs islam.

Arab supremacy and white supremacy are two different things. Tariq makes himself look foolish when he tries to lump all geopolitics and history into white supremacy

 

[Booker T Garvey]

This is a terrible "debate". Both of these guys are terrible debaters and just trying to win mini arguments without the ability to do so.

Very hard to listen to because they're such terrible debaters

what about their debate skills?

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

@CodeBlaMeVi is a known Tariq cynic, so you can take his comments on the debate vs Schultz with a grain of salt.

Huh? Elaborate, please. I am fan but objectively his points weren't solid and emotionally driven. Silly asking an anglo saxon for empathy.

 

[Box Factory]

what about their debate skills?

Tariq doesn't seem to be able to articulate his points and gets flustered easy. He makes too many vague statements and doesn't back them up very well. He also makes over the top statements which hurt his overall points

Schultz seems intentionally obtuse and isn't willing to accept any obvious common sense stuff. He also seems to think he's smarter than everybody and doesn't want to accept tariqs personal anecdotes. When Tariq was speaking about what he personally saw in Africa and Schultz was trying to tell Tariq what he saw would be a good example of it

They're also both not working towards an overall debate theme and just bickering over mini arguments.

 

[BiggWebb79]

Both these guys are talking over each other makes it hard to listen to at one point.

 

[lightskin jermaine]

'i'm on meth, i have head lice and i'm STILL superior to a black guy..'- tariq

 

[O.Red]

Why folks in this thread ACTIN like they need a bunch of rattling off of numbers and peer-reviewed essays to support what is obvious is beyond me. Just sayin, if it's raining outside, do you Google "historical weather patterns in my region", refer to an almanac, and/or blame HAARP?? No. The fact that it's raining is conclusion enough and you should dress appropriately.

Don't be dense for the sake of being contrary brehs. Be better than that.

/Thread