This thread quickly exposed who knows nothing about their history, who is just a hater and who’s bussy is sensitive. Dude talking about there is no proof!
You think a gay slave master wasn’t gonna rape male slaves but we know for fact female slaves were getting raped in droves. You think there is some gay code of conduct? They raping boys out here now in 2021 but in slavery they was civil? That’s what you think?
Buck breaking wasn’t all about rape though. It was about the de-masculinization and humiliation of the strongest most masculine man the planet has known.
If you had done any research at all on enslaved black history you would know that this happened for FACT. They would tie male slaves up and make them shyt in each other’s mouths in front of their wives and kids just to humiliate them.
here are some simple googles you dumb c00ns that can’t see the message dude is sending:
Men without Pants: Masculinity and the Enslaved | AAIHS
https://www.dukeupress.edu/Assets/PubMaterials/978-0-8223-7129-8_601.pdf
https://escholarship.org/content/qt8300c8fr/qt8300c8fr.pdf
The Sexual Abuse of Black Men under American Slavery on JSTOR
Thomas Thistlewood, an eighteenth-century Jamaican planter, noted in his diary two incidents of homosexual assault. For one of them he recorded a report of a Mr. Watt committing sodomy with his negroe waiting boy. In slavery, there are many accounts of rape and sexual abuse by slaveholders towards their slaves. Many slaves tried to fight back and resist the sexual abuse. However, that didn’t always result in a good outcome. While it is known that many enslaved women were sexually abused, it is important to highlight that male slaves were also sexually abused by slaveholders.
l abuse of women. Throughout history, there has been much acknowledgement of the enslaved women who experienced sexual abuse. However, the same cannot be said for the enslaved males who also experienced horrific sexual abuse under American slavery. It is believed that the rape of enslaved men has also gone unacknowledged because of the current historical tendency to define rape along gendered lines, making both victims and perpetrators reluctant to discuss male rape.
Thistlewood mentioned that the homosexual act occurred between an enslaver and his enslaved boy who was a close personal servant of his. A question that poses is, is it possible that the sexual abuse occurred because the boy was in close proximity to his enslaver? Foster helps answer this question by stating that “this type of abuse follows a broader pattern that suggests the closer proximity to whites, the more likely the sexual abuse was to occur”.
So from this point forward anyone arguing that this never happened or that it didn’t happen enough to talk about is either an agent or a c00n or both. Or a bussy lover that don’t want to be exposed for his fecal fetish.
brehs the shyt is deep. These demons been surviving off our bodies for far too long.
Breh, I think we may have some white posters on here many pretending to be black that don't want to believe what their ancestors did and relatives today do. These Tariq movies really make them sick because they ain't getting no fluff history with them crowbarred in.
