TAME IMPALA THE SLOW RUSH

Harry B

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
30,102
Reputation
-1,479
Daps
60,113
Currents was pop as hell tho:dwillhuh:

I dunno this sounds like a better version of Currents to me
As I said, it was expected after the commercial and musical success of Currents (and going major) to make it clearer.
The big difference for me at least was that currents was a lot more psychedelic and raw, following but yet innovating on the backdrop of iS and Lonerism. This follows Currents, but again further away from the psychedelic rock turned psychedelic pop, not as challenging, and less innovative. I can’t really say anything about the lyrical content yet but felt weaker on the first plays.
 

Trot LaRoc

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
11,456
Reputation
1,390
Daps
35,915
Reppin
Chi/LA
As I said, it was expected after the commercial and musical success of Currents (and going major) to make it clearer.
The big difference for me at least was that currents was a lot more psychedelic and raw, following but yet innovating on the backdrop of iS and Lonerism. This follows Currents, but again further away from the psychedelic rock turned psychedelic pop, not as challenging, and less innovative. I can’t really say anything about the lyrical content yet but felt weaker on the first plays.

Currents is def not more psychedelic or raw....it sounds more commercial and smoothed out than this album imo. The lyrics are better on this than Currents....personally I thought the lyrics on Currents were pretty meh.

I guess we're gonna agree to disagree:yeshrug:
 

Hammer

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
16,039
Reputation
-13,421
Daps
16,332
album has low replay value. like 5 of the songs came out before it dropped. overall its aight but I expected better
 
Top